基于计算力学的断裂试样预测裂纹扩展方法验证

S. Kalyanam, L. Hill, G. Wilkowski, F. Brust
{"title":"基于计算力学的断裂试样预测裂纹扩展方法验证","authors":"S. Kalyanam, L. Hill, G. Wilkowski, F. Brust","doi":"10.1115/pvp2022-84898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The last several decades have seen growth in elastic-plastic fracture mechanics and the modeling of the behavior of structural steels employed in the nuclear, oil and gas, and other construction industries. Among these are a particular class of problems that provide challenges in modeling the physical behavior of structural steels using finite element modeling (FEM) approach that are based on microstructural damage and using parameters that depict the strain and stress states in the material region ahead of an existing crack. In this work, a recently experimented and investigated pipeline steel X80 material was modeled through two different fracture specimen geometries, namely single-edge-notch-tension, SEN(T) and compact-tension, C(T) to compare and contrast the predictions from two material damage models (microstructure and continuum based). The predictions from both these damage models that predict the ductile crack growth have been compared to the experimental findings of the crack growth (obtained using a d-c Electric Potential measurement technique), the corresponding load levels, and crack opening displacements (CODs). The points of similarity between the experimental measurements and the fracture surface observations of crack growth and the predictions from the FEM approach have been discussed. The same X80 material properties and damage model parameters were employed to predict the ductile crack growth in the two different fracture specimen geometries, SEN(T) and C(T) with a subtle change of one of the parameter values. This sheds light on the predictability of the crack initiation event and the subsequent ductile crack growth until failure using these damage models. The findings provide credence to the applicability of either model (after they are carefully tuned to arrive at optimized parameters) for piping materials while providing a framework for flaw evaluation methodologies. The investigation also opens the doors for regions where mesh regularization methods and modeling approaches along with mathematical relations can be developed to form a more efficient framework for modeling specimens with diverse constraints efficiently and develop material fracture resistance curves.","PeriodicalId":434925,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4A: Materials and Fabrication","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational Mechanics Based Validation of Crack Growth Approaches for Fracture Specimen Predictions\",\"authors\":\"S. Kalyanam, L. Hill, G. Wilkowski, F. Brust\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/pvp2022-84898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The last several decades have seen growth in elastic-plastic fracture mechanics and the modeling of the behavior of structural steels employed in the nuclear, oil and gas, and other construction industries. Among these are a particular class of problems that provide challenges in modeling the physical behavior of structural steels using finite element modeling (FEM) approach that are based on microstructural damage and using parameters that depict the strain and stress states in the material region ahead of an existing crack. In this work, a recently experimented and investigated pipeline steel X80 material was modeled through two different fracture specimen geometries, namely single-edge-notch-tension, SEN(T) and compact-tension, C(T) to compare and contrast the predictions from two material damage models (microstructure and continuum based). The predictions from both these damage models that predict the ductile crack growth have been compared to the experimental findings of the crack growth (obtained using a d-c Electric Potential measurement technique), the corresponding load levels, and crack opening displacements (CODs). The points of similarity between the experimental measurements and the fracture surface observations of crack growth and the predictions from the FEM approach have been discussed. The same X80 material properties and damage model parameters were employed to predict the ductile crack growth in the two different fracture specimen geometries, SEN(T) and C(T) with a subtle change of one of the parameter values. This sheds light on the predictability of the crack initiation event and the subsequent ductile crack growth until failure using these damage models. The findings provide credence to the applicability of either model (after they are carefully tuned to arrive at optimized parameters) for piping materials while providing a framework for flaw evaluation methodologies. The investigation also opens the doors for regions where mesh regularization methods and modeling approaches along with mathematical relations can be developed to form a more efficient framework for modeling specimens with diverse constraints efficiently and develop material fracture resistance curves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 4A: Materials and Fabrication\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 4A: Materials and Fabrication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-84898\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4A: Materials and Fabrication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-84898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,在核、石油、天然气和其他建筑行业中使用的弹塑性断裂力学和结构钢行为建模得到了发展。在这些问题中,有一类特殊的问题为使用基于微结构损伤的有限元建模(FEM)方法对结构钢的物理行为进行建模提供了挑战,这种方法使用参数来描述现有裂纹之前材料区域的应变和应力状态。在这项工作中,通过两种不同的断裂试样几何形状,即单边缺口张力,SEN(T)和紧致张力,C(T),对最近试验和研究的管道钢X80材料进行了建模,以比较和对比两种材料损伤模型(微观结构和基于连续体的)的预测。将这两种损伤模型预测的韧性裂纹扩展结果与裂纹扩展的实验结果(使用直流电势测量技术获得)、相应的载荷水平和裂纹张开位移(CODs)进行了比较。讨论了实验测量值与断面裂纹扩展观测值及有限元方法预测值之间的相似点。采用相同的X80材料性能和损伤模型参数来预测两种不同断裂试样几何形状(SEN(T)和C(T))下的韧性裂纹扩展,其中一个参数值发生了细微变化。这揭示了使用这些损伤模型对裂纹起裂事件和随后的延性裂纹扩展直至失效的可预测性。研究结果为两种模型(经过仔细调整以获得优化参数后)对管道材料的适用性提供了证据,同时为缺陷评估方法提供了框架。该研究还为网格正则化方法和建模方法以及数学关系的发展打开了大门,从而形成更有效的框架,有效地对具有不同约束的样品进行建模,并开发材料断裂阻力曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computational Mechanics Based Validation of Crack Growth Approaches for Fracture Specimen Predictions
The last several decades have seen growth in elastic-plastic fracture mechanics and the modeling of the behavior of structural steels employed in the nuclear, oil and gas, and other construction industries. Among these are a particular class of problems that provide challenges in modeling the physical behavior of structural steels using finite element modeling (FEM) approach that are based on microstructural damage and using parameters that depict the strain and stress states in the material region ahead of an existing crack. In this work, a recently experimented and investigated pipeline steel X80 material was modeled through two different fracture specimen geometries, namely single-edge-notch-tension, SEN(T) and compact-tension, C(T) to compare and contrast the predictions from two material damage models (microstructure and continuum based). The predictions from both these damage models that predict the ductile crack growth have been compared to the experimental findings of the crack growth (obtained using a d-c Electric Potential measurement technique), the corresponding load levels, and crack opening displacements (CODs). The points of similarity between the experimental measurements and the fracture surface observations of crack growth and the predictions from the FEM approach have been discussed. The same X80 material properties and damage model parameters were employed to predict the ductile crack growth in the two different fracture specimen geometries, SEN(T) and C(T) with a subtle change of one of the parameter values. This sheds light on the predictability of the crack initiation event and the subsequent ductile crack growth until failure using these damage models. The findings provide credence to the applicability of either model (after they are carefully tuned to arrive at optimized parameters) for piping materials while providing a framework for flaw evaluation methodologies. The investigation also opens the doors for regions where mesh regularization methods and modeling approaches along with mathematical relations can be developed to form a more efficient framework for modeling specimens with diverse constraints efficiently and develop material fracture resistance curves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信