在线协作学习中内部和人际互动中的性别动态建模

Yiwen Lin, Nia Dowell, Andrew Godfrey, Heeryung Choi, Christopher A. Brooks
{"title":"在线协作学习中内部和人际互动中的性别动态建模","authors":"Yiwen Lin, Nia Dowell, Andrew Godfrey, Heeryung Choi, Christopher A. Brooks","doi":"10.1145/3303772.3303837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been long-standing stereotypes on men and women's communication styles, such as men using more assertive or aggressive language and women showing more agreeableness and emotions in interactions. In the context of collaborative learning, male learners often believed to be more active participants while female learners are less engaged. To further explore gender differences in learners communication behavior and whether it has changed in the context of online synchronous collaboration, we examined students interactions at a sociocognitive level with a methodology called Group Communication Analysis (GCA). We found that there were no significant differences between men and women in the degree of participation. However, women exhibited significantly higher average social impact, responsivity and internal cohesion compared to men. We also compared the proportion of learners interaction profiles, and results suggest that women are more likely to be effective and cohesive communicators. We discussed implications of these findings for pedagogical practices to promote inclusivity and equity in collaborative learning online.","PeriodicalId":382957,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling gender dynamics in intra and interpersonal interactions during online collaborative learning\",\"authors\":\"Yiwen Lin, Nia Dowell, Andrew Godfrey, Heeryung Choi, Christopher A. Brooks\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3303772.3303837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There has been long-standing stereotypes on men and women's communication styles, such as men using more assertive or aggressive language and women showing more agreeableness and emotions in interactions. In the context of collaborative learning, male learners often believed to be more active participants while female learners are less engaged. To further explore gender differences in learners communication behavior and whether it has changed in the context of online synchronous collaboration, we examined students interactions at a sociocognitive level with a methodology called Group Communication Analysis (GCA). We found that there were no significant differences between men and women in the degree of participation. However, women exhibited significantly higher average social impact, responsivity and internal cohesion compared to men. We also compared the proportion of learners interaction profiles, and results suggest that women are more likely to be effective and cohesive communicators. We discussed implications of these findings for pedagogical practices to promote inclusivity and equity in collaborative learning online.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

长期以来,人们对男性和女性的沟通方式一直存在刻板印象,比如男性使用更自信或更具攻击性的语言,而女性在互动中表现出更随和和更情绪化。在协作学习的背景下,男性学习者通常被认为是更积极的参与者,而女性学习者的参与度较低。为了进一步探索学习者沟通行为的性别差异,以及它是否在在线同步协作的背景下发生了变化,我们使用一种称为群体沟通分析(GCA)的方法,在社会认知层面检查了学生的互动。我们发现男性和女性在参与程度上没有显著差异。然而,与男性相比,女性表现出更高的平均社会影响力、反应性和内部凝聚力。我们还比较了学习者互动档案的比例,结果表明女性更有可能成为有效和有凝聚力的沟通者。我们讨论了这些发现对促进在线协作学习的包容性和公平性的教学实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling gender dynamics in intra and interpersonal interactions during online collaborative learning
There has been long-standing stereotypes on men and women's communication styles, such as men using more assertive or aggressive language and women showing more agreeableness and emotions in interactions. In the context of collaborative learning, male learners often believed to be more active participants while female learners are less engaged. To further explore gender differences in learners communication behavior and whether it has changed in the context of online synchronous collaboration, we examined students interactions at a sociocognitive level with a methodology called Group Communication Analysis (GCA). We found that there were no significant differences between men and women in the degree of participation. However, women exhibited significantly higher average social impact, responsivity and internal cohesion compared to men. We also compared the proportion of learners interaction profiles, and results suggest that women are more likely to be effective and cohesive communicators. We discussed implications of these findings for pedagogical practices to promote inclusivity and equity in collaborative learning online.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信