危机中的自由普遍主义:民族民粹主义对跨国政治标准的挑战

O. Kuhn
{"title":"危机中的自由普遍主义:民族民粹主义对跨国政治标准的挑战","authors":"O. Kuhn","doi":"10.1080/21931674.2018.1505590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The explanation of the right-wing populist attack on transnational standards of pluralism and cooperation as caused by unsolved problems of the economic structure is often disputed by regarding populism a “cultural backlash” supported by groups now deprived of their former predominant position by new universalist standards. However, the “cultural” explanation disregards the historical fact that antiliberal backlash in the direction of authoritarianism, nationalism, scapegoating, anti-migration has frequently followed severe economic crises and the preceding erosion of integrating political legitimacy sources. The weakness of the liberal political discourse position is at its core a knowledge crisis in the face of the failure of its own universalist agenda, while the transnational populist regression to particularism is rather its effect.","PeriodicalId":413830,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Social Review","volume":"198 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liberal universalism in crisis: The nationalist populist challenge of transnational political standards\",\"authors\":\"O. Kuhn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21931674.2018.1505590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The explanation of the right-wing populist attack on transnational standards of pluralism and cooperation as caused by unsolved problems of the economic structure is often disputed by regarding populism a “cultural backlash” supported by groups now deprived of their former predominant position by new universalist standards. However, the “cultural” explanation disregards the historical fact that antiliberal backlash in the direction of authoritarianism, nationalism, scapegoating, anti-migration has frequently followed severe economic crises and the preceding erosion of integrating political legitimacy sources. The weakness of the liberal political discourse position is at its core a knowledge crisis in the face of the failure of its own universalist agenda, while the transnational populist regression to particularism is rather its effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Social Review\",\"volume\":\"198 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Social Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2018.1505590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Social Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2018.1505590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

右翼民粹主义对跨国多元主义和合作标准的攻击是由经济结构的未解决问题引起的,这一解释经常受到争议,因为民粹主义是一种“文化反弹”,由现在被新的普遍主义标准剥夺了其先前主导地位的群体所支持。然而,“文化”解释忽视了这样一个历史事实:在威权主义、民族主义、找替罪羊、反移民等方向上的反自由主义反弹,往往伴随着严重的经济危机和之前对整合政治合法性来源的侵蚀。自由主义政治话语地位的弱点,其核心是面对其自身普遍主义议程的失败而产生的知识危机,而跨国民粹主义向特殊主义的回归则是其后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Liberal universalism in crisis: The nationalist populist challenge of transnational political standards
ABSTRACT The explanation of the right-wing populist attack on transnational standards of pluralism and cooperation as caused by unsolved problems of the economic structure is often disputed by regarding populism a “cultural backlash” supported by groups now deprived of their former predominant position by new universalist standards. However, the “cultural” explanation disregards the historical fact that antiliberal backlash in the direction of authoritarianism, nationalism, scapegoating, anti-migration has frequently followed severe economic crises and the preceding erosion of integrating political legitimacy sources. The weakness of the liberal political discourse position is at its core a knowledge crisis in the face of the failure of its own universalist agenda, while the transnational populist regression to particularism is rather its effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信