“跨界雾霾污染”在大众网和malaysiakini.com新闻门户网站上的批判话语分析

U. Asmara, D. Mulyana, Henny Srimulyani Rohayati
{"title":"“跨界雾霾污染”在大众网和malaysiakini.com新闻门户网站上的批判话语分析","authors":"U. Asmara, D. Mulyana, Henny Srimulyani Rohayati","doi":"10.14421/PJK.V13I2.1872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine the construction of cross-border smoke haze (Transboundary Haze Pollution) on detik.com and malaysiakini.com news portal. This study used qualitative method with critical discourse analysis (Critical Discourse Analysis/ CDA) from Teun A. van Dijk’s Model. The results of this study showed that both the reporters detik.com and malaysiakini.com thematically used certain language prominence in writing the news. That was done to attract the attention of the readers. From these two different news portals, it could be concluded that each media was influenced by the interest of each country. It was also very clear that each media did not want to blame the state itself and pro-government. Schematically, from the beginning, detik.com reporters directed that Malaysia corner Indonesia not only through the issue of fog but also touched on the issue of the invasion of pigs. Whereas in the news portal malaysiakini.com, the journalist had directed the reader to the protest letter posted by Malaysia to the Indonesian government. While, semantically, detik.com reporters saw that Malaysia truly blames Indonesia without looking at companies from their countries which involved in forest and land fires in the Indonesian territory. On the malaysiakini.com portal, they dismissed it by making a phrase wanting to help the Indonesian government in dealing with fires that occurred in Indonesian territory.","PeriodicalId":143543,"journal":{"name":"Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF “TRANSBOUNDARY HAZE POLLUTION” ON DETIK.COM AND MALAYSIAKINI.COM NEWS PORTAL\",\"authors\":\"U. Asmara, D. Mulyana, Henny Srimulyani Rohayati\",\"doi\":\"10.14421/PJK.V13I2.1872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to determine the construction of cross-border smoke haze (Transboundary Haze Pollution) on detik.com and malaysiakini.com news portal. This study used qualitative method with critical discourse analysis (Critical Discourse Analysis/ CDA) from Teun A. van Dijk’s Model. The results of this study showed that both the reporters detik.com and malaysiakini.com thematically used certain language prominence in writing the news. That was done to attract the attention of the readers. From these two different news portals, it could be concluded that each media was influenced by the interest of each country. It was also very clear that each media did not want to blame the state itself and pro-government. Schematically, from the beginning, detik.com reporters directed that Malaysia corner Indonesia not only through the issue of fog but also touched on the issue of the invasion of pigs. Whereas in the news portal malaysiakini.com, the journalist had directed the reader to the protest letter posted by Malaysia to the Indonesian government. While, semantically, detik.com reporters saw that Malaysia truly blames Indonesia without looking at companies from their countries which involved in forest and land fires in the Indonesian territory. On the malaysiakini.com portal, they dismissed it by making a phrase wanting to help the Indonesian government in dealing with fires that occurred in Indonesian territory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14421/PJK.V13I2.1872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/PJK.V13I2.1872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在确定detik.com和malaysiakini.com新闻门户网站上跨境烟雾(Transboundary haze Pollution)的构建。本研究采用Teun A. van Dijk的批评性话语分析(critical discourse analysis / CDA)的定性方法。本研究结果表明,detik.com和malaysiakini.com的记者在撰写新闻时都在主题上使用了一定的语言突出性。那样做是为了引起读者的注意。从这两个不同的新闻门户网站可以看出,每个媒体都受到各自国家利益的影响。很明显,每个媒体都不想指责国家本身和亲政府。从图式上讲,从一开始,dettik.com记者就直指马来西亚角印尼,不仅通过雾霾问题,还触及了猪入侵问题。而在新闻门户网站malaysiakini.com上,记者则引导读者去看马来西亚发给印尼政府的抗议信。然而,从语义上看,detik.com记者看到,马来西亚真正指责印尼,却没有去看那些在印尼境内发生森林和土地火灾的本国公司。在门户网站malaysiakini.com上,他们制作了一个短语,希望帮助印尼政府处理发生在印尼领土上的火灾,以此来驳斥这一说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF “TRANSBOUNDARY HAZE POLLUTION” ON DETIK.COM AND MALAYSIAKINI.COM NEWS PORTAL
This study aimed to determine the construction of cross-border smoke haze (Transboundary Haze Pollution) on detik.com and malaysiakini.com news portal. This study used qualitative method with critical discourse analysis (Critical Discourse Analysis/ CDA) from Teun A. van Dijk’s Model. The results of this study showed that both the reporters detik.com and malaysiakini.com thematically used certain language prominence in writing the news. That was done to attract the attention of the readers. From these two different news portals, it could be concluded that each media was influenced by the interest of each country. It was also very clear that each media did not want to blame the state itself and pro-government. Schematically, from the beginning, detik.com reporters directed that Malaysia corner Indonesia not only through the issue of fog but also touched on the issue of the invasion of pigs. Whereas in the news portal malaysiakini.com, the journalist had directed the reader to the protest letter posted by Malaysia to the Indonesian government. While, semantically, detik.com reporters saw that Malaysia truly blames Indonesia without looking at companies from their countries which involved in forest and land fires in the Indonesian territory. On the malaysiakini.com portal, they dismissed it by making a phrase wanting to help the Indonesian government in dealing with fires that occurred in Indonesian territory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信