脑幕上肿瘤术中神经监测。第2部分。感觉传导的评估,对结果的影响和方法限制

A. Dmitriev, M. Sinkin, V. Dashyan
{"title":"脑幕上肿瘤术中神经监测。第2部分。感觉传导的评估,对结果的影响和方法限制","authors":"A. Dmitriev, M. Sinkin, V. Dashyan","doi":"10.17650/1683-3295-2022-24-3-73-79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among methods of assessment of sensory conductivity of neuromonitoring in surgery of supratentorial tumors somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal are used most commonly to identify location of central sulcus. Method's uniqueness lies in possibility of its usage in patients with severe paresis before operation. Its sensitivity reaches 97 % but decreases with tumor location in Rolandic area.In monitoring of visual evoked potentials integrity of visual pathways are estimated, that is actually in lesions of occipital and posterior temporal lobes. Accuracy of visual evoked potentials reaches 94 %. In contrast to mapping of visual pathways method is more unbiassed because is not founded on subjective patient's feelings and can be applied in general anesthesia.Neuromonitoring's usage increases extent of eloquent tumor resection in 2 to 5 times and decreases the number of permanent neurological deficit in 2 times after surgery.Accuracy of neuromonitoring decreases in reoperations and in ischemic damage due to angiospasm. To maintain high predictive value of the method amount of monitoring muscles should be inverse proportionally to the density of subcortical pathways in area of resection.","PeriodicalId":197162,"journal":{"name":"Russian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"612 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative neuromonitoring in surgery of supratentorial brain tumors. Part 2. Assessment of sensory conductivity, impact at outcomes and method restrictions\",\"authors\":\"A. Dmitriev, M. Sinkin, V. Dashyan\",\"doi\":\"10.17650/1683-3295-2022-24-3-73-79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among methods of assessment of sensory conductivity of neuromonitoring in surgery of supratentorial tumors somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal are used most commonly to identify location of central sulcus. Method's uniqueness lies in possibility of its usage in patients with severe paresis before operation. Its sensitivity reaches 97 % but decreases with tumor location in Rolandic area.In monitoring of visual evoked potentials integrity of visual pathways are estimated, that is actually in lesions of occipital and posterior temporal lobes. Accuracy of visual evoked potentials reaches 94 %. In contrast to mapping of visual pathways method is more unbiassed because is not founded on subjective patient's feelings and can be applied in general anesthesia.Neuromonitoring's usage increases extent of eloquent tumor resection in 2 to 5 times and decreases the number of permanent neurological deficit in 2 times after surgery.Accuracy of neuromonitoring decreases in reoperations and in ischemic damage due to angiospasm. To maintain high predictive value of the method amount of monitoring muscles should be inverse proportionally to the density of subcortical pathways in area of resection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"612 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2022-24-3-73-79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2022-24-3-73-79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

幕上肿瘤手术中神经监测的感觉电导率评估方法中,最常用的是体感诱发电位相反转法来确定中央沟的位置。该方法的独特之处在于其在术前重度瘫患者中应用的可能性。其灵敏度可达97%,但随肿瘤部位的不同而降低。在视觉诱发电位的监测中,视觉通路的完整性被估计,这实际上是在枕叶和后颞叶的病变中。视觉诱发电位准确度达94%。与视觉路径映射法相比,该方法不以患者的主观感受为基础,更具有无偏性,可应用于全身麻醉。神经监测的应用使肿瘤切除范围增加2 ~ 5次,术后永久性神经功能缺损减少2次。再手术和血管痉挛引起的缺血性损伤时,神经监测的准确性下降。为了保持该方法的高预测价值,监测肌肉的数量应与切除面积皮质下通路的密度成反比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraoperative neuromonitoring in surgery of supratentorial brain tumors. Part 2. Assessment of sensory conductivity, impact at outcomes and method restrictions
Among methods of assessment of sensory conductivity of neuromonitoring in surgery of supratentorial tumors somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal are used most commonly to identify location of central sulcus. Method's uniqueness lies in possibility of its usage in patients with severe paresis before operation. Its sensitivity reaches 97 % but decreases with tumor location in Rolandic area.In monitoring of visual evoked potentials integrity of visual pathways are estimated, that is actually in lesions of occipital and posterior temporal lobes. Accuracy of visual evoked potentials reaches 94 %. In contrast to mapping of visual pathways method is more unbiassed because is not founded on subjective patient's feelings and can be applied in general anesthesia.Neuromonitoring's usage increases extent of eloquent tumor resection in 2 to 5 times and decreases the number of permanent neurological deficit in 2 times after surgery.Accuracy of neuromonitoring decreases in reoperations and in ischemic damage due to angiospasm. To maintain high predictive value of the method amount of monitoring muscles should be inverse proportionally to the density of subcortical pathways in area of resection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信