评估当前时代使用机器学习方法进行银行风险管理的主要指标的关键调查

Preety Tak
{"title":"评估当前时代使用机器学习方法进行银行风险管理的主要指标的关键调查","authors":"Preety Tak","doi":"10.52783/cienceng.v11i1.210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a variety of application fields, including image classification, recognition of speech, and machine interpretation, machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have attained human-level performance. Nonetheless, master based credit risk models keep on administering in the monetary business. To continuously present new strategies, it is important to lay out significant benchmarks and correlations on AI approaches and human master based models. The progressions in banking and chance administration, as well as the present and future issues, have been the subject of much exploration in both scholarly community and business. Through an examination of the current writing, this paper expects to distinguish regions or issues in risk the board that poor person been adequately investigated and might be great contender for additional exploration. It additionally examinations and assesses AI methods that have been explored with regards to banking risk the executives. The comparison's main results showed that machine-learning models outperformed traditional methods. The neural networks also demonstrated excellent results when compared to other methods of machine-learning (ML) in relations of AUC and precission/ accuracy.","PeriodicalId":214525,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding International Conference on Science and Engineering","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Investigation in Assessing the Main Metrics of Using Machine Learning Approaches for Bank Risk Management in the Current Era\",\"authors\":\"Preety Tak\",\"doi\":\"10.52783/cienceng.v11i1.210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a variety of application fields, including image classification, recognition of speech, and machine interpretation, machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have attained human-level performance. Nonetheless, master based credit risk models keep on administering in the monetary business. To continuously present new strategies, it is important to lay out significant benchmarks and correlations on AI approaches and human master based models. The progressions in banking and chance administration, as well as the present and future issues, have been the subject of much exploration in both scholarly community and business. Through an examination of the current writing, this paper expects to distinguish regions or issues in risk the board that poor person been adequately investigated and might be great contender for additional exploration. It additionally examinations and assesses AI methods that have been explored with regards to banking risk the executives. The comparison's main results showed that machine-learning models outperformed traditional methods. The neural networks also demonstrated excellent results when compared to other methods of machine-learning (ML) in relations of AUC and precission/ accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceeding International Conference on Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceeding International Conference on Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52783/cienceng.v11i1.210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding International Conference on Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52783/cienceng.v11i1.210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在各种应用领域,包括图像分类、语音识别和机器解释,机器学习(ML)和人工智能(AI)已经达到了人类的水平。尽管如此,基于大师的信用风险模型仍在货币业务中发挥着作用。为了不断提出新的策略,重要的是要在人工智能方法和基于人类大师的模型上制定重要的基准和相关性。银行和机会管理的发展,以及当前和未来的问题,一直是学术界和商界探索的主题。通过对当前写作的审查,本文希望区分风险中的地区或问题,即穷人得到充分调查的董事会,并可能成为进一步探索的有力竞争者。它还检查和评估了人工智能方法,这些方法已经在银行风险管理方面进行了探索。比较的主要结果表明,机器学习模型优于传统方法。与其他机器学习(ML)方法相比,神经网络在AUC和精度/准确度的关系上也表现出了出色的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critical Investigation in Assessing the Main Metrics of Using Machine Learning Approaches for Bank Risk Management in the Current Era
In a variety of application fields, including image classification, recognition of speech, and machine interpretation, machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have attained human-level performance. Nonetheless, master based credit risk models keep on administering in the monetary business. To continuously present new strategies, it is important to lay out significant benchmarks and correlations on AI approaches and human master based models. The progressions in banking and chance administration, as well as the present and future issues, have been the subject of much exploration in both scholarly community and business. Through an examination of the current writing, this paper expects to distinguish regions or issues in risk the board that poor person been adequately investigated and might be great contender for additional exploration. It additionally examinations and assesses AI methods that have been explored with regards to banking risk the executives. The comparison's main results showed that machine-learning models outperformed traditional methods. The neural networks also demonstrated excellent results when compared to other methods of machine-learning (ML) in relations of AUC and precission/ accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信