职场弹性的四个因素

L. Mallak
{"title":"职场弹性的四个因素","authors":"L. Mallak","doi":"10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An interconnected world places high expectations on individuals. Working effectively to meet these expectations requires resilience, among other attributes. Thus, resilience has entered into the realm of organizational and engineering management. However, there are considerable differences among the several definitions and research streams concerning resilience. This paper uses case studies and empirical data to inform the study of workplace resilience. Much of the resilience research to date has focused on patients and individuals under the care of clinical professionals for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), adolescent mental health, and coping skills. Recently, interest in studying resilience in the workplace has necessitated the need for models and instruments validated with the general workforce population. One instrument-the Workplace Resilience Instrument (WRI)-has been developed and validated with several segments of the U.S. workforce. The WRI produced four factors: Active Problem-Solving, Team Efficacy, Confident Sense-Making, and Bricolage. These four factors provide insight to the effective functioning of individuals within engineering management organizations and have implications for organizational performance. The meaning and implications of these four resilience factors are shared using case studies, examples, and findings from the research to date.","PeriodicalId":438177,"journal":{"name":"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Four Factors of Workplace Resilience\",\"authors\":\"L. Mallak\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An interconnected world places high expectations on individuals. Working effectively to meet these expectations requires resilience, among other attributes. Thus, resilience has entered into the realm of organizational and engineering management. However, there are considerable differences among the several definitions and research streams concerning resilience. This paper uses case studies and empirical data to inform the study of workplace resilience. Much of the resilience research to date has focused on patients and individuals under the care of clinical professionals for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), adolescent mental health, and coping skills. Recently, interest in studying resilience in the workplace has necessitated the need for models and instruments validated with the general workforce population. One instrument-the Workplace Resilience Instrument (WRI)-has been developed and validated with several segments of the U.S. workforce. The WRI produced four factors: Active Problem-Solving, Team Efficacy, Confident Sense-Making, and Bricolage. These four factors provide insight to the effective functioning of individuals within engineering management organizations and have implications for organizational performance. The meaning and implications of these four resilience factors are shared using case studies, examples, and findings from the research to date.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个相互联系的世界对个人寄予了很高的期望。有效地工作以满足这些期望需要弹性和其他属性。因此,弹性已经进入了组织和工程管理的领域。然而,关于弹性的几种定义和研究流之间存在相当大的差异。本文采用案例研究和实证数据来为工作场所弹性的研究提供信息。迄今为止,大部分关于心理弹性的研究都集中在创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、青少年心理健康和应对技能治疗的临床专业人员护理下的患者和个人身上。最近,对工作场所弹性研究的兴趣使得需要与一般劳动力人群验证的模型和工具成为必要。其中一个工具——工作场所弹性工具(WRI)——已经在美国劳动力的几个部分中得到了开发和验证。世界资源研究所提出了四个因素:积极解决问题、团队效能、自信的意义构建和拼凑。这四个因素为工程管理组织中个人的有效运作提供了洞察力,并对组织绩效有影响。这四个弹性因素的意义和影响是通过案例研究、例子和迄今为止的研究结果来分享的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Four Factors of Workplace Resilience
An interconnected world places high expectations on individuals. Working effectively to meet these expectations requires resilience, among other attributes. Thus, resilience has entered into the realm of organizational and engineering management. However, there are considerable differences among the several definitions and research streams concerning resilience. This paper uses case studies and empirical data to inform the study of workplace resilience. Much of the resilience research to date has focused on patients and individuals under the care of clinical professionals for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), adolescent mental health, and coping skills. Recently, interest in studying resilience in the workplace has necessitated the need for models and instruments validated with the general workforce population. One instrument-the Workplace Resilience Instrument (WRI)-has been developed and validated with several segments of the U.S. workforce. The WRI produced four factors: Active Problem-Solving, Team Efficacy, Confident Sense-Making, and Bricolage. These four factors provide insight to the effective functioning of individuals within engineering management organizations and have implications for organizational performance. The meaning and implications of these four resilience factors are shared using case studies, examples, and findings from the research to date.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信