学生对OMM虚拟实践考试的看法:在社会距离的背景下

Gabriel Berenbeim, Isaac Metzler, Drew D. Lewis, Chunfa Jie
{"title":"学生对OMM虚拟实践考试的看法:在社会距离的背景下","authors":"Gabriel Berenbeim, Isaac Metzler, Drew D. Lewis, Chunfa Jie","doi":"10.53702/2375-5717-32.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) practical examinations (PEs) are important for assessing osteopathic medical students’ cognitive knowledge and psychomotor skills required for osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT). In the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, first-year medical students at Des Moines University (DMU) were no longer allowed to participate in a standard in-person PE (sPE) in December 2020. A novel virtual PE (vPE) over Zoom was developed to assess the students’ understanding of OMM learned in lab to replace the sPE.\n \n \n \n To determine if the vPE was perceived by the students as a successful and efficacious alternative to the sPE.\n \n \n \n After the graduating class of 2024 completed their vPE, an administrative email from the DMU OMM department was sent to gather anonymous, voluntary student feedback evaluating their perception and experience of the vPE. The survey consisted of 5 Likert scale questions that asked students to determine the extent they agree to 5 distinct statements and the survey contained a free-text response question asking for suggestions to improve the vPE experience. A Chi-square test of goodness-of-fit was used to assess for equal distributions of responses. Simultaneous 95% confidence intervals (CI) for multinomial proportions were created. The free text was qualitatively analyzed based on themes.\n \n \n \n Of the 224 first-year osteopathic students, 207 students responded to the Likert scale questions and 113 responded to the free text. Students strongly agree or somewhat agree that the vPE was a fair assessment of their knowledge of OMM lab material (90.82%) and optimally assessed their procedural OMM skills (86.96%). Students strongly agree that the vPE better assessed their OMM lab knowledge than a written multiple-choice examination (73.91%) and they received helpful feedback during the vPE (77.78%).\n \n \n \n Survey results support that the vPE was perceived by students to be an effective and fair alternative to the sPE. The creative use of a pair of pants and a prop sacrum was validated, as students confirmed that the vPE optimally assessed their procedural skills given the practical’s limitations.\n","PeriodicalId":341091,"journal":{"name":"The AAO Journal","volume":"62 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Perception of an OMM Virtual Practical Examination: In the Setting of Social Distancing\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Berenbeim, Isaac Metzler, Drew D. Lewis, Chunfa Jie\",\"doi\":\"10.53702/2375-5717-32.1.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) practical examinations (PEs) are important for assessing osteopathic medical students’ cognitive knowledge and psychomotor skills required for osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT). In the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, first-year medical students at Des Moines University (DMU) were no longer allowed to participate in a standard in-person PE (sPE) in December 2020. A novel virtual PE (vPE) over Zoom was developed to assess the students’ understanding of OMM learned in lab to replace the sPE.\\n \\n \\n \\n To determine if the vPE was perceived by the students as a successful and efficacious alternative to the sPE.\\n \\n \\n \\n After the graduating class of 2024 completed their vPE, an administrative email from the DMU OMM department was sent to gather anonymous, voluntary student feedback evaluating their perception and experience of the vPE. The survey consisted of 5 Likert scale questions that asked students to determine the extent they agree to 5 distinct statements and the survey contained a free-text response question asking for suggestions to improve the vPE experience. A Chi-square test of goodness-of-fit was used to assess for equal distributions of responses. Simultaneous 95% confidence intervals (CI) for multinomial proportions were created. The free text was qualitatively analyzed based on themes.\\n \\n \\n \\n Of the 224 first-year osteopathic students, 207 students responded to the Likert scale questions and 113 responded to the free text. Students strongly agree or somewhat agree that the vPE was a fair assessment of their knowledge of OMM lab material (90.82%) and optimally assessed their procedural OMM skills (86.96%). Students strongly agree that the vPE better assessed their OMM lab knowledge than a written multiple-choice examination (73.91%) and they received helpful feedback during the vPE (77.78%).\\n \\n \\n \\n Survey results support that the vPE was perceived by students to be an effective and fair alternative to the sPE. The creative use of a pair of pants and a prop sacrum was validated, as students confirmed that the vPE optimally assessed their procedural skills given the practical’s limitations.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":341091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The AAO Journal\",\"volume\":\"62 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The AAO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53702/2375-5717-32.1.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The AAO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53702/2375-5717-32.1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

整骨手法医学(OMM)实践考试(PEs)对于评估整骨医学学生在整骨手法治疗(OMT)中所需要的认知知识和精神运动技能非常重要。为了应对COVID-19大流行,得梅因大学(DMU)的一年级医学生从2020年12月起不再被允许参加标准的面对面体育课(sPE)。在Zoom上开发了一种新的虚拟PE (vPE)来评估学生对在实验室学习的OMM的理解,以取代sPE。确定学生是否认为vPE是sPE的一个成功和有效的替代方案。2024届毕业班完成vPE后,DMU管理部门发送了一封管理电子邮件,以收集匿名的、自愿的学生反馈,评估他们对vPE的看法和体验。调查包括5个李克特量表问题,要求学生确定他们对5个不同陈述的同意程度,调查包含一个自由文本回答问题,询问改善vPE体验的建议。采用卡方拟合优度检验来评估响应的均匀分布。同时建立多项比例的95%置信区间。根据主题对自由文本进行定性分析。在224名一年级整骨疗法学生中,207名学生回答了李克特量表的问题,113名学生回答了免费文本。学生们强烈同意或多少同意vPE是对他们对OMM实验材料知识的公平评估(90.82%),并最佳地评估了他们的OMM程序技能(86.96%)。学生们强烈认为vPE比书面多项选择考试更能评估他们的OMM实验室知识(73.91%),并且他们在vPE期间得到了有益的反馈(77.78%)。调查结果表明,学生认为vPE是一种有效和公平的选择,可以替代sPE。一条裤子和一个支柱骶骨的创造性使用得到了验证,因为学生们确认,考虑到实践的局限性,vPE最佳地评估了他们的程序技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student Perception of an OMM Virtual Practical Examination: In the Setting of Social Distancing
Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) practical examinations (PEs) are important for assessing osteopathic medical students’ cognitive knowledge and psychomotor skills required for osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT). In the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, first-year medical students at Des Moines University (DMU) were no longer allowed to participate in a standard in-person PE (sPE) in December 2020. A novel virtual PE (vPE) over Zoom was developed to assess the students’ understanding of OMM learned in lab to replace the sPE. To determine if the vPE was perceived by the students as a successful and efficacious alternative to the sPE. After the graduating class of 2024 completed their vPE, an administrative email from the DMU OMM department was sent to gather anonymous, voluntary student feedback evaluating their perception and experience of the vPE. The survey consisted of 5 Likert scale questions that asked students to determine the extent they agree to 5 distinct statements and the survey contained a free-text response question asking for suggestions to improve the vPE experience. A Chi-square test of goodness-of-fit was used to assess for equal distributions of responses. Simultaneous 95% confidence intervals (CI) for multinomial proportions were created. The free text was qualitatively analyzed based on themes. Of the 224 first-year osteopathic students, 207 students responded to the Likert scale questions and 113 responded to the free text. Students strongly agree or somewhat agree that the vPE was a fair assessment of their knowledge of OMM lab material (90.82%) and optimally assessed their procedural OMM skills (86.96%). Students strongly agree that the vPE better assessed their OMM lab knowledge than a written multiple-choice examination (73.91%) and they received helpful feedback during the vPE (77.78%). Survey results support that the vPE was perceived by students to be an effective and fair alternative to the sPE. The creative use of a pair of pants and a prop sacrum was validated, as students confirmed that the vPE optimally assessed their procedural skills given the practical’s limitations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信