递归量化分析揭示了专家与新手的眼动行为差异

Preethi Vaidyanathan, J. Pelz, Cecilia Ovesdotter Alm, P. Shi, Anne R. Haake
{"title":"递归量化分析揭示了专家与新手的眼动行为差异","authors":"Preethi Vaidyanathan, J. Pelz, Cecilia Ovesdotter Alm, P. Shi, Anne R. Haake","doi":"10.1145/2578153.2578207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding and characterizing perceptual expertise is a major bottleneck in developing intelligent systems. In knowledge-rich domains such as dermatology, perceptual expertise influences the diagnostic inferences made based on the visual input. This study uses eye movement data from 12 dermatology experts and 12 undergraduate novices while they inspected 34 dermatological images. This work investigates the differences in global and local temporal fixation patterns between the two groups using recurrence quantification analysis (RQA). The RQA measures reveal significant differences in both global and local temporal patterns between the two groups. Results show that experts tended to refixate previously inspected areas less often than did novices, and their refixations were more widely separated in time. Experts were also less likely to follow extended scan paths repeatedly than were novices. These results suggest the potential value of RQA measures in characterizing perceptual expertise. We also discuss potential use of the RQA method in understanding the interactions between experts' visual and linguistic behavior.","PeriodicalId":142459,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrence quantification analysis reveals eye-movement behavior differences between experts and novices\",\"authors\":\"Preethi Vaidyanathan, J. Pelz, Cecilia Ovesdotter Alm, P. Shi, Anne R. Haake\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2578153.2578207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding and characterizing perceptual expertise is a major bottleneck in developing intelligent systems. In knowledge-rich domains such as dermatology, perceptual expertise influences the diagnostic inferences made based on the visual input. This study uses eye movement data from 12 dermatology experts and 12 undergraduate novices while they inspected 34 dermatological images. This work investigates the differences in global and local temporal fixation patterns between the two groups using recurrence quantification analysis (RQA). The RQA measures reveal significant differences in both global and local temporal patterns between the two groups. Results show that experts tended to refixate previously inspected areas less often than did novices, and their refixations were more widely separated in time. Experts were also less likely to follow extended scan paths repeatedly than were novices. These results suggest the potential value of RQA measures in characterizing perceptual expertise. We also discuss potential use of the RQA method in understanding the interactions between experts' visual and linguistic behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2578153.2578207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2578153.2578207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

理解和表征感知经验是开发智能系统的主要瓶颈。在知识丰富的领域,如皮肤病学,感性专业知识影响基于视觉输入的诊断推断。这项研究使用了12名皮肤科专家和12名本科新手在检查34张皮肤科图像时的眼动数据。本研究使用复发量化分析(RQA)研究了两组之间整体和局部时间固定模式的差异。RQA测量揭示了两组之间在全球和局部时间模式上的显著差异。结果表明,专家修复以前检查过的区域的频率低于新手,并且他们的修复时间间隔更大。专家也不太可能重复遵循扩展扫描路径比新手。这些结果表明,RQA措施在表征知觉专业知识的潜在价值。我们还讨论了RQA方法在理解专家的视觉和语言行为之间的相互作用方面的潜在用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recurrence quantification analysis reveals eye-movement behavior differences between experts and novices
Understanding and characterizing perceptual expertise is a major bottleneck in developing intelligent systems. In knowledge-rich domains such as dermatology, perceptual expertise influences the diagnostic inferences made based on the visual input. This study uses eye movement data from 12 dermatology experts and 12 undergraduate novices while they inspected 34 dermatological images. This work investigates the differences in global and local temporal fixation patterns between the two groups using recurrence quantification analysis (RQA). The RQA measures reveal significant differences in both global and local temporal patterns between the two groups. Results show that experts tended to refixate previously inspected areas less often than did novices, and their refixations were more widely separated in time. Experts were also less likely to follow extended scan paths repeatedly than were novices. These results suggest the potential value of RQA measures in characterizing perceptual expertise. We also discuss potential use of the RQA method in understanding the interactions between experts' visual and linguistic behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信