医疗保健方面的隐私技术经验

Ross J. Anderson
{"title":"医疗保健方面的隐私技术经验","authors":"Ross J. Anderson","doi":"10.1109/SECPRI.2000.848466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The probability that information will be abused depends both on its value and on the number of people, who have access. The modern trend to ever larger databases increases both of these risk factors at the same time. Compartmented security policies can solve many of the technical issues, and there are applications such as healthcare where they have been developed in some detail. But the big problem isn't technical; it is legal and regulatory. Insurers, employers and governments won't adopt compartmented systems, or will allow them to be adopted only in places such as hospitals which are not where the real threats lie.","PeriodicalId":373624,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding 2000 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. S&P 2000","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy technology lessons from healthcare\",\"authors\":\"Ross J. Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SECPRI.2000.848466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The probability that information will be abused depends both on its value and on the number of people, who have access. The modern trend to ever larger databases increases both of these risk factors at the same time. Compartmented security policies can solve many of the technical issues, and there are applications such as healthcare where they have been developed in some detail. But the big problem isn't technical; it is legal and regulatory. Insurers, employers and governments won't adopt compartmented systems, or will allow them to be adopted only in places such as hospitals which are not where the real threats lie.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceeding 2000 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. S&P 2000\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceeding 2000 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. S&P 2000\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECPRI.2000.848466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding 2000 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. S&P 2000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECPRI.2000.848466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

信息被滥用的可能性既取决于信息的价值,也取决于获取信息的人数。越来越大的数据库的现代趋势同时增加了这两种风险因素。划分的安全策略可以解决许多技术问题,并且在医疗保健等应用程序中已经详细开发了这些策略。但大问题不在于技术;这是合法和监管的。保险公司、雇主和政府不会采用隔离系统,或者只允许在医院等不是真正威胁所在的地方采用这种系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Privacy technology lessons from healthcare
The probability that information will be abused depends both on its value and on the number of people, who have access. The modern trend to ever larger databases increases both of these risk factors at the same time. Compartmented security policies can solve many of the technical issues, and there are applications such as healthcare where they have been developed in some detail. But the big problem isn't technical; it is legal and regulatory. Insurers, employers and governments won't adopt compartmented systems, or will allow them to be adopted only in places such as hospitals which are not where the real threats lie.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信