基于vhdl的断层注入技术的比较与应用

J. Gracia, J. Baraza, D. Gil, P. Gil
{"title":"基于vhdl的断层注入技术的比较与应用","authors":"J. Gracia, J. Baraza, D. Gil, P. Gil","doi":"10.1109/DFTVS.2001.966775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compares different VHDL-based fault injection techniques: simulator commands, saboteurs and mutants for the validation of fault tolerant systems. Some extensions and implementation designs of these techniques have been introduced. Also, a wide set of non-usual fault models have been implemented. As an application, a fault tolerant microcomputer system has been validated. Faults have been injected using an injection tool developed by the GSTF. We have injected both transient and permanent faults on the system model, using two different workloads. We have studied the pathology of the propagated errors, measured their latencies, and calculated both detection and recovery coverages. Preliminary results show that coverages for transient faults can be obtained quite accurately with any of the three techniques. This enables the use of different abstraction level models for the same system. We have also verified significant differences in implementation and simulation cost between the studied injection techniques.","PeriodicalId":187031,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems","volume":"168 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"77","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison and application of different VHDL-based fault injection techniques\",\"authors\":\"J. Gracia, J. Baraza, D. Gil, P. Gil\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DFTVS.2001.966775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Compares different VHDL-based fault injection techniques: simulator commands, saboteurs and mutants for the validation of fault tolerant systems. Some extensions and implementation designs of these techniques have been introduced. Also, a wide set of non-usual fault models have been implemented. As an application, a fault tolerant microcomputer system has been validated. Faults have been injected using an injection tool developed by the GSTF. We have injected both transient and permanent faults on the system model, using two different workloads. We have studied the pathology of the propagated errors, measured their latencies, and calculated both detection and recovery coverages. Preliminary results show that coverages for transient faults can be obtained quite accurately with any of the three techniques. This enables the use of different abstraction level models for the same system. We have also verified significant differences in implementation and simulation cost between the studied injection techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems\",\"volume\":\"168 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"77\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DFTVS.2001.966775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DFTVS.2001.966775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77

摘要

比较了不同的基于vhdl的故障注入技术:用于容错系统验证的模拟器命令、破坏者和突变体。介绍了这些技术的一些扩展和实现设计。此外,还实现了一套广泛的非常见故障模型。作为一种应用,对微机容错系统进行了验证。使用GSTF开发的注入工具对断层进行了注入。我们使用两种不同的工作负载,在系统模型上注入了瞬时故障和永久故障。我们研究了传播错误的病理,测量了它们的延迟,并计算了检测和恢复覆盖率。初步结果表明,三种方法中的任何一种都能较准确地获得暂态故障的覆盖率。这允许对同一个系统使用不同的抽象级别模型。我们还验证了所研究的注射技术之间在实施和模拟成本方面的显着差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison and application of different VHDL-based fault injection techniques
Compares different VHDL-based fault injection techniques: simulator commands, saboteurs and mutants for the validation of fault tolerant systems. Some extensions and implementation designs of these techniques have been introduced. Also, a wide set of non-usual fault models have been implemented. As an application, a fault tolerant microcomputer system has been validated. Faults have been injected using an injection tool developed by the GSTF. We have injected both transient and permanent faults on the system model, using two different workloads. We have studied the pathology of the propagated errors, measured their latencies, and calculated both detection and recovery coverages. Preliminary results show that coverages for transient faults can be obtained quite accurately with any of the three techniques. This enables the use of different abstraction level models for the same system. We have also verified significant differences in implementation and simulation cost between the studied injection techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信