全面征税:单一税皇帝的新衣

L. Parada
{"title":"全面征税:单一税皇帝的新衣","authors":"L. Parada","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3636073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has recently been argued in the international tax literature that the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project (BEPS) reflects and effectuates full taxation, namely an international norm that would suggest that all of a company’s income should be taxed in places where it has real business activities, representing a modern approach to the single-taxation paradigm. This article builds upon the concept of full taxation and argues that although rhetorically attractive, the concept is still conceptually inconsistent, particularly because it is incapable of providing any hints as regards where and who should finally be taxed. Moreover, it adopts an overinclusive and instrumental approach, the purpose of which appears to be only to legitimatise the use of coordinated provisions whose rationale attend exclusively to avoid the complete absence of taxation in cross-border transactions. This approach, innocuous at first sight, suggests however the unprincipled purpose of taxation just for the sake of taxation, putting at risk countries wishing to attract real economic activities and stigmatising the outcome of double non-taxation in a permanent way.","PeriodicalId":282044,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Full Taxation: The Single Tax Emperor's New Clothes\",\"authors\":\"L. Parada\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3636073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has recently been argued in the international tax literature that the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project (BEPS) reflects and effectuates full taxation, namely an international norm that would suggest that all of a company’s income should be taxed in places where it has real business activities, representing a modern approach to the single-taxation paradigm. This article builds upon the concept of full taxation and argues that although rhetorically attractive, the concept is still conceptually inconsistent, particularly because it is incapable of providing any hints as regards where and who should finally be taxed. Moreover, it adopts an overinclusive and instrumental approach, the purpose of which appears to be only to legitimatise the use of coordinated provisions whose rationale attend exclusively to avoid the complete absence of taxation in cross-border transactions. This approach, innocuous at first sight, suggests however the unprincipled purpose of taxation just for the sake of taxation, putting at risk countries wishing to attract real economic activities and stigmatising the outcome of double non-taxation in a permanent way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Economy: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Economy: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3636073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3636073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近在国际税务文献中有人认为,经合组织税基侵蚀和利润转移项目(BEPS)反映并实现了全面征税,即一项国际规范,该规范建议公司的所有收入都应在其有实际商业活动的地方征税,代表了单一税收范式的现代方法。本文建立在全面征税概念的基础上,并认为尽管在修辞上很有吸引力,但这个概念在概念上仍然不一致,特别是因为它无法提供任何关于最终应该向何处和谁征税的提示。此外,它采取了一种过于包容和工具性的方法,其目的似乎只是使使用协调条款合法化,这些条款的理由完全是为了避免在跨境交易中完全不征税。这种方法乍一看是无害的,但它表明了为了征税而征税的无原则目的,使那些希望吸引实际经济活动的国家处于危险之中,并使双重不征税的结果永久性地受到污名化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Full Taxation: The Single Tax Emperor's New Clothes
It has recently been argued in the international tax literature that the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project (BEPS) reflects and effectuates full taxation, namely an international norm that would suggest that all of a company’s income should be taxed in places where it has real business activities, representing a modern approach to the single-taxation paradigm. This article builds upon the concept of full taxation and argues that although rhetorically attractive, the concept is still conceptually inconsistent, particularly because it is incapable of providing any hints as regards where and who should finally be taxed. Moreover, it adopts an overinclusive and instrumental approach, the purpose of which appears to be only to legitimatise the use of coordinated provisions whose rationale attend exclusively to avoid the complete absence of taxation in cross-border transactions. This approach, innocuous at first sight, suggests however the unprincipled purpose of taxation just for the sake of taxation, putting at risk countries wishing to attract real economic activities and stigmatising the outcome of double non-taxation in a permanent way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信