演示直喷等体积燃烧室作为液体燃料化学动力学建模的验证工具

A. E. Suttle, B. T. Fisher, D. Parnell, J. Bittle
{"title":"演示直喷等体积燃烧室作为液体燃料化学动力学建模的验证工具","authors":"A. E. Suttle, B. T. Fisher, D. Parnell, J. Bittle","doi":"10.1115/ICEF2018-9729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supporting chemical kinetics model development with robust experimental results is the job of shock-tube, rapid compression machine, and other apparatus operators. A key limitation of many of these systems is difficulty with preparation of a fuel vapor-air mixture for heavy liquid fuels. Previous work has suggested that the Cetane Ignition Delay (CID) 510 system is capable of providing data useful for kinetics validation. Specifically, this constant-volume combustion chamber (1) can be characterized by a single bulk temperature, and (2) uses a high-pressure diesel injector to generate rapid fuel-air mixing and thus create a homogeneous mixture well before ignition.\n In this study, initial experiments found relatively good agreement between experiments and kinetic models for n-heptane and poor agreement for iso-octane under nominally the same ignition delay ranges for ambient conditions under which the mixture is determined to be effectively homogeneous. After excluding potential non-kinetic fuel properties as causes, further experiments highlight the high pressure sensitivity of the negative temperature coefficient (NTC) behavior. While this challenge is well known to kinetic mechanism developers, the data set included in this work (n-heptane at 5 bar and iso-octane at 5–20 bar, each for various equivalence ratios) can be added to those used for validation.\n The results and system characterization presented demonstrate that this combustion system is capable of capturing kinetic effects decoupled from the spray process for these primary reference fuels. Future work can leverage this capability to provide kinetics validation data for most heavy, exotic, or otherwise difficult to test liquid fuels.","PeriodicalId":441369,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Large Bore Engines; Fuels; Advanced Combustion","volume":"589 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demonstrating a Direct-Injection Constant-Volume Combustion Chamber As a Validation Tool for Chemical Kinetic Modeling of Liquid Fuels\",\"authors\":\"A. E. Suttle, B. T. Fisher, D. Parnell, J. Bittle\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/ICEF2018-9729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supporting chemical kinetics model development with robust experimental results is the job of shock-tube, rapid compression machine, and other apparatus operators. A key limitation of many of these systems is difficulty with preparation of a fuel vapor-air mixture for heavy liquid fuels. Previous work has suggested that the Cetane Ignition Delay (CID) 510 system is capable of providing data useful for kinetics validation. Specifically, this constant-volume combustion chamber (1) can be characterized by a single bulk temperature, and (2) uses a high-pressure diesel injector to generate rapid fuel-air mixing and thus create a homogeneous mixture well before ignition.\\n In this study, initial experiments found relatively good agreement between experiments and kinetic models for n-heptane and poor agreement for iso-octane under nominally the same ignition delay ranges for ambient conditions under which the mixture is determined to be effectively homogeneous. After excluding potential non-kinetic fuel properties as causes, further experiments highlight the high pressure sensitivity of the negative temperature coefficient (NTC) behavior. While this challenge is well known to kinetic mechanism developers, the data set included in this work (n-heptane at 5 bar and iso-octane at 5–20 bar, each for various equivalence ratios) can be added to those used for validation.\\n The results and system characterization presented demonstrate that this combustion system is capable of capturing kinetic effects decoupled from the spray process for these primary reference fuels. Future work can leverage this capability to provide kinetics validation data for most heavy, exotic, or otherwise difficult to test liquid fuels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 1: Large Bore Engines; Fuels; Advanced Combustion\",\"volume\":\"589 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 1: Large Bore Engines; Fuels; Advanced Combustion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/ICEF2018-9729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Large Bore Engines; Fuels; Advanced Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ICEF2018-9729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

支持化学动力学模型的发展与稳健的实验结果是激波管,快速压缩机,和其他设备操作员的工作。许多这类系统的一个关键限制是难以制备用于重质液体燃料的燃料蒸汽-空气混合物。先前的工作表明十六烷点火延迟(CID) 510系统能够提供动力学验证有用的数据。具体来说,这种等体积燃烧室(1)的特点是单一的整体温度,(2)使用高压柴油喷油器产生快速的燃料-空气混合,从而在点火前产生均匀的混合物。在本研究中,初始实验发现,在名义上相同的点火延迟范围内,实验和正庚烷的动力学模型之间的一致性相对较好,而异辛烷的一致性较差,在此环境条件下,混合物被确定为有效均匀。在排除了潜在的非动力学燃料特性作为原因后,进一步的实验强调了负温度系数(NTC)行为的高压敏感性。虽然这一挑战对于动力学机制开发人员来说是众所周知的,但本工作中包含的数据集(5 bar的正庚烷和5 - 20 bar的异辛烷,每个都有不同的等效比)可以添加到用于验证的数据集中。结果和系统表征表明,该燃烧系统能够捕获与这些主要参考燃料的喷雾过程解耦的动力学效应。未来的工作可以利用这种能力为大多数重质、外来或其他难以测试的液体燃料提供动力学验证数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Demonstrating a Direct-Injection Constant-Volume Combustion Chamber As a Validation Tool for Chemical Kinetic Modeling of Liquid Fuels
Supporting chemical kinetics model development with robust experimental results is the job of shock-tube, rapid compression machine, and other apparatus operators. A key limitation of many of these systems is difficulty with preparation of a fuel vapor-air mixture for heavy liquid fuels. Previous work has suggested that the Cetane Ignition Delay (CID) 510 system is capable of providing data useful for kinetics validation. Specifically, this constant-volume combustion chamber (1) can be characterized by a single bulk temperature, and (2) uses a high-pressure diesel injector to generate rapid fuel-air mixing and thus create a homogeneous mixture well before ignition. In this study, initial experiments found relatively good agreement between experiments and kinetic models for n-heptane and poor agreement for iso-octane under nominally the same ignition delay ranges for ambient conditions under which the mixture is determined to be effectively homogeneous. After excluding potential non-kinetic fuel properties as causes, further experiments highlight the high pressure sensitivity of the negative temperature coefficient (NTC) behavior. While this challenge is well known to kinetic mechanism developers, the data set included in this work (n-heptane at 5 bar and iso-octane at 5–20 bar, each for various equivalence ratios) can be added to those used for validation. The results and system characterization presented demonstrate that this combustion system is capable of capturing kinetic effects decoupled from the spray process for these primary reference fuels. Future work can leverage this capability to provide kinetics validation data for most heavy, exotic, or otherwise difficult to test liquid fuels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信