地热储层人工神经网络:对油气储层的启示

Calista Dikeh, C. Ikeokwu, T. Egbe, Murphy Nnamdi Ochuba, Moromoke Adekanye, Emmanuel G. Anifowose, E. Okoroafor
{"title":"地热储层人工神经网络:对油气储层的启示","authors":"Calista Dikeh, C. Ikeokwu, T. Egbe, Murphy Nnamdi Ochuba, Moromoke Adekanye, Emmanuel G. Anifowose, E. Okoroafor","doi":"10.2118/212028-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Subsurface numerical models take a significant time to build and run. For this reason, the energy industry has been looking towards proxy models that could reduce model computational time. With the advancement of artificial neural network algorithms, building proxy models has become more efficient, and has enabled quick forecasting and quick reservoir management decision-making.\n In this study, we used a geothermal reservoir to evaluate the suitability of two deep learning algorithms, feed forward neural network and convolutional neural network, for proxy modeling. We used metrics such as the mean square error, losses, number of parameters for the model, and time to run, to compare the two deep learning algorithms.\n From our study, we determined that the convolutional neural network resulted in less error than the feed forward network and used less hyperparameters. However, the feed forward network was significantly faster than the convolutional neural network. The process of building the proxy model shows how a similar approach can be followed for oil and gas reservoir modeling and demonstrates the feasibility of neural networks in subsurface reservoir modeling and forecasting.","PeriodicalId":399294,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022","volume":"589 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Neural Networks for Geothermal Reservoirs: Implications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"Calista Dikeh, C. Ikeokwu, T. Egbe, Murphy Nnamdi Ochuba, Moromoke Adekanye, Emmanuel G. Anifowose, E. Okoroafor\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/212028-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Subsurface numerical models take a significant time to build and run. For this reason, the energy industry has been looking towards proxy models that could reduce model computational time. With the advancement of artificial neural network algorithms, building proxy models has become more efficient, and has enabled quick forecasting and quick reservoir management decision-making.\\n In this study, we used a geothermal reservoir to evaluate the suitability of two deep learning algorithms, feed forward neural network and convolutional neural network, for proxy modeling. We used metrics such as the mean square error, losses, number of parameters for the model, and time to run, to compare the two deep learning algorithms.\\n From our study, we determined that the convolutional neural network resulted in less error than the feed forward network and used less hyperparameters. However, the feed forward network was significantly faster than the convolutional neural network. The process of building the proxy model shows how a similar approach can be followed for oil and gas reservoir modeling and demonstrates the feasibility of neural networks in subsurface reservoir modeling and forecasting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022\",\"volume\":\"589 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/212028-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212028-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地下数值模型的建立和运行需要花费大量时间。出于这个原因,能源行业一直在寻找可以减少模型计算时间的代理模型。随着人工神经网络算法的发展,代理模型的建立变得更加高效,能够实现快速预测和快速的油藏管理决策。在这项研究中,我们利用一个地热储层来评估两种深度学习算法(前馈神经网络和卷积神经网络)在代理建模中的适用性。我们使用了均方误差、损失、模型参数数量和运行时间等指标来比较两种深度学习算法。从我们的研究中,我们确定卷积神经网络比前馈网络产生更小的误差,并且使用更少的超参数。但是,前馈网络的速度明显快于卷积神经网络。建立代理模型的过程表明,在油气储层建模中可以采用类似的方法,并证明了神经网络在地下储层建模和预测中的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Neural Networks for Geothermal Reservoirs: Implications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs
Subsurface numerical models take a significant time to build and run. For this reason, the energy industry has been looking towards proxy models that could reduce model computational time. With the advancement of artificial neural network algorithms, building proxy models has become more efficient, and has enabled quick forecasting and quick reservoir management decision-making. In this study, we used a geothermal reservoir to evaluate the suitability of two deep learning algorithms, feed forward neural network and convolutional neural network, for proxy modeling. We used metrics such as the mean square error, losses, number of parameters for the model, and time to run, to compare the two deep learning algorithms. From our study, we determined that the convolutional neural network resulted in less error than the feed forward network and used less hyperparameters. However, the feed forward network was significantly faster than the convolutional neural network. The process of building the proxy model shows how a similar approach can be followed for oil and gas reservoir modeling and demonstrates the feasibility of neural networks in subsurface reservoir modeling and forecasting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信