{"title":"反垄断立法在促进健康商业竞争气候方面的有效性:判决书第13号/ kppui - /2019号判例研究","authors":"Luqman Hakim","doi":"10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss4.art15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The free market that has hit Indonesia can lead to unscrupulous business actors that operate unfair business competition. If the fraud continues to occur, it will have a negative impact considering the market share is only towards a handful of business actors, resulting in unfair business competition. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in creating a healthy climate of business competition in the case study of Decision Number 13/KPPU-I/2019. This study uses the normative method, in which the approach is the statutory approach based on legal doctrine, legal concepts, legal principles, KKPU decisions and related laws and regulations. The data sources used are secondary data consisting of the Antimonopoly Law, Decision Number 13/KPPU-I/2019 related to market concentration, where the KPPU effectively enforces the law in accordance with the Antimonopoly Law in order to create fair business competition and other scientific works. relevant to answer the formulation of the problem. The results and conclusions of this study indicate that the Antimonopoly Law has been effectively implemented by the KPPU because in carrying out law enforcement the KPPU coordinates with the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the judiciary under it. Should an unfair business competition case concerns a foreign company, KPPU will coordinate with the business competition authority in the relevant country.","PeriodicalId":141165,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Lex Renaissance","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efektivitas Undang-Undang Antimonopoli dalam Mewujudkan Iklim Persaingan Usaha yang Sehat: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 13/KPPU-I/2019\",\"authors\":\"Luqman Hakim\",\"doi\":\"10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss4.art15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The free market that has hit Indonesia can lead to unscrupulous business actors that operate unfair business competition. If the fraud continues to occur, it will have a negative impact considering the market share is only towards a handful of business actors, resulting in unfair business competition. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in creating a healthy climate of business competition in the case study of Decision Number 13/KPPU-I/2019. This study uses the normative method, in which the approach is the statutory approach based on legal doctrine, legal concepts, legal principles, KKPU decisions and related laws and regulations. The data sources used are secondary data consisting of the Antimonopoly Law, Decision Number 13/KPPU-I/2019 related to market concentration, where the KPPU effectively enforces the law in accordance with the Antimonopoly Law in order to create fair business competition and other scientific works. relevant to answer the formulation of the problem. The results and conclusions of this study indicate that the Antimonopoly Law has been effectively implemented by the KPPU because in carrying out law enforcement the KPPU coordinates with the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the judiciary under it. Should an unfair business competition case concerns a foreign company, KPPU will coordinate with the business competition authority in the relevant country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":141165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Lex Renaissance\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Lex Renaissance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss4.art15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Lex Renaissance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss4.art15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
打击印尼的自由市场可能导致不道德的商业行为者进行不公平的商业竞争。如果欺诈行为继续发生,考虑到市场份额只针对少数业务参与者,将产生负面影响,导致不公平的商业竞争。本研究旨在以第13/ kpui /2019号决定为例,考察1999年《禁止垄断行为和不正当商业竞争第5号法》在创造健康的商业竞争环境方面的有效性。本研究采用的是规范性方法,即以法律学说、法律概念、法律原则、KKPU判决及相关法律法规为基础的成文法方法。所使用的数据来源是二手数据,包括反垄断法第13/KPPU- i /2019号决定,涉及市场集中,KPPU根据反垄断法有效执法,以创造公平的商业竞争和其他科学工作。相关的公式回答问题。这项研究的结果和结论表明,反垄断法得到了印度尼西亚共和国反垄断法局的有效执行,因为在执行执法时,印度尼西亚共和国反垄断法局与印度尼西亚共和国最高法院及其下属的司法机构进行协调。如果不正当商业竞争案件涉及外国公司,KPPU将与相关国家的商业竞争主管部门协调。
Efektivitas Undang-Undang Antimonopoli dalam Mewujudkan Iklim Persaingan Usaha yang Sehat: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 13/KPPU-I/2019
The free market that has hit Indonesia can lead to unscrupulous business actors that operate unfair business competition. If the fraud continues to occur, it will have a negative impact considering the market share is only towards a handful of business actors, resulting in unfair business competition. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in creating a healthy climate of business competition in the case study of Decision Number 13/KPPU-I/2019. This study uses the normative method, in which the approach is the statutory approach based on legal doctrine, legal concepts, legal principles, KKPU decisions and related laws and regulations. The data sources used are secondary data consisting of the Antimonopoly Law, Decision Number 13/KPPU-I/2019 related to market concentration, where the KPPU effectively enforces the law in accordance with the Antimonopoly Law in order to create fair business competition and other scientific works. relevant to answer the formulation of the problem. The results and conclusions of this study indicate that the Antimonopoly Law has been effectively implemented by the KPPU because in carrying out law enforcement the KPPU coordinates with the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the judiciary under it. Should an unfair business competition case concerns a foreign company, KPPU will coordinate with the business competition authority in the relevant country.