{"title":"腹腔镜卵巢钻孔(LOD)治疗多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)的疗效:回顾性病例回顾","authors":"Rifat Syed, J. Zaidi, Nabeha Dhar","doi":"10.33574/hjog.0303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the effectivity of laparoscopic ovarian drilling procedures at the East Sussex Healthcare Trust, UK, over the past decade on sub-fertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome, regardless of clomiphene resistance. Design: Retrospective case note review of LOD procedures Methods: Study 1: Evaluating a systematic literature review investigating ovulation and pregnancy rates following LOD. Study 2: An audit of 58 women with LOD treated for ovulation induction at the ESHT fertility clinic between 2005-2014. Main outcome measures: Ovulation, pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage rates; tubal patency; associated pathologies; previous treatments compared with Cochrane Review 2012. Results: Study 1: From the literature review, 71% achieved ovulation, whereas the pregnancy, live birth and miscarriage rates were 25-51%, 24-44% and 4-9% respectively. Study 2: Of the 58 patients studied, ovulation rate was 69%, pregnancy rate was 39.4% and live birth rate was 30.3%. The miscarriage rate was 15.4%. Pregnancy outcome after LOD, irrespective of further treatment, showed 34 pregnancies. Including 17 spontaneous pregnancies and 17 pregnancies after further treatment. Of the 34 pregnancies, 85.3% were live birth, 11.7% miscarriages and 1 ectopic pregnancy. Conclusion: No significant difference in ovulation rates post-LOD in ESHT, which is comparable to published studies. The low pregnancy and live birth rates indicate that additional factors affect the success of LOD. Co-existing pathology is associated with lower pregnancy rate post-LOD. Novel theories are postulated to explain underlying pathologies, thus PCOS treatment may change and open a fascinating area of research.","PeriodicalId":194739,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): A retrospective case note review\",\"authors\":\"Rifat Syed, J. Zaidi, Nabeha Dhar\",\"doi\":\"10.33574/hjog.0303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the effectivity of laparoscopic ovarian drilling procedures at the East Sussex Healthcare Trust, UK, over the past decade on sub-fertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome, regardless of clomiphene resistance. Design: Retrospective case note review of LOD procedures Methods: Study 1: Evaluating a systematic literature review investigating ovulation and pregnancy rates following LOD. Study 2: An audit of 58 women with LOD treated for ovulation induction at the ESHT fertility clinic between 2005-2014. Main outcome measures: Ovulation, pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage rates; tubal patency; associated pathologies; previous treatments compared with Cochrane Review 2012. Results: Study 1: From the literature review, 71% achieved ovulation, whereas the pregnancy, live birth and miscarriage rates were 25-51%, 24-44% and 4-9% respectively. Study 2: Of the 58 patients studied, ovulation rate was 69%, pregnancy rate was 39.4% and live birth rate was 30.3%. The miscarriage rate was 15.4%. Pregnancy outcome after LOD, irrespective of further treatment, showed 34 pregnancies. Including 17 spontaneous pregnancies and 17 pregnancies after further treatment. Of the 34 pregnancies, 85.3% were live birth, 11.7% miscarriages and 1 ectopic pregnancy. Conclusion: No significant difference in ovulation rates post-LOD in ESHT, which is comparable to published studies. The low pregnancy and live birth rates indicate that additional factors affect the success of LOD. Co-existing pathology is associated with lower pregnancy rate post-LOD. Novel theories are postulated to explain underlying pathologies, thus PCOS treatment may change and open a fascinating area of research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33574/hjog.0303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33574/hjog.0303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcome of laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): A retrospective case note review
Objective: To evaluate the effectivity of laparoscopic ovarian drilling procedures at the East Sussex Healthcare Trust, UK, over the past decade on sub-fertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome, regardless of clomiphene resistance. Design: Retrospective case note review of LOD procedures Methods: Study 1: Evaluating a systematic literature review investigating ovulation and pregnancy rates following LOD. Study 2: An audit of 58 women with LOD treated for ovulation induction at the ESHT fertility clinic between 2005-2014. Main outcome measures: Ovulation, pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage rates; tubal patency; associated pathologies; previous treatments compared with Cochrane Review 2012. Results: Study 1: From the literature review, 71% achieved ovulation, whereas the pregnancy, live birth and miscarriage rates were 25-51%, 24-44% and 4-9% respectively. Study 2: Of the 58 patients studied, ovulation rate was 69%, pregnancy rate was 39.4% and live birth rate was 30.3%. The miscarriage rate was 15.4%. Pregnancy outcome after LOD, irrespective of further treatment, showed 34 pregnancies. Including 17 spontaneous pregnancies and 17 pregnancies after further treatment. Of the 34 pregnancies, 85.3% were live birth, 11.7% miscarriages and 1 ectopic pregnancy. Conclusion: No significant difference in ovulation rates post-LOD in ESHT, which is comparable to published studies. The low pregnancy and live birth rates indicate that additional factors affect the success of LOD. Co-existing pathology is associated with lower pregnancy rate post-LOD. Novel theories are postulated to explain underlying pathologies, thus PCOS treatment may change and open a fascinating area of research.