非线性过程和测量模型中航迹与航迹融合方法的比较

Muhammad Altamash Khan
{"title":"非线性过程和测量模型中航迹与航迹融合方法的比较","authors":"Muhammad Altamash Khan","doi":"10.1109/SDF.2019.8916652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automotive sensors play a vital role in the environment perception for vehicles in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). Sensors have their own distinctive advantages and drawbacks, which makes it imperative to fuse information from disparate sources. The fusion can be performed either at the sensor or the track level. Track to track fusion (T2TF) offers a big advantage as individual sensor blocks can be treated as grey or even black boxes i.e. a very limited knowledge of their characteristics might be required. In this paper, we study T2TF for a single target vehicle, tracked by two generic sensors, differing in kinematic tracking accuracy. A challenging reference trajectory is simulated consisting of both linear and nonlinear motion segments. The main objective is to compare the performance of different nonlinear sensor fusion algorithms, comprising of several combinations of prediction and measurement update methods. We show that the covariance intersection based update methods outperform the Kalman filter derivatives, as they tend not to produce overly optimistic estimates.","PeriodicalId":186196,"journal":{"name":"2019 Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF)","volume":"1069 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Track to Track fusion methods for nonlinear process and measurement models\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Altamash Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SDF.2019.8916652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automotive sensors play a vital role in the environment perception for vehicles in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). Sensors have their own distinctive advantages and drawbacks, which makes it imperative to fuse information from disparate sources. The fusion can be performed either at the sensor or the track level. Track to track fusion (T2TF) offers a big advantage as individual sensor blocks can be treated as grey or even black boxes i.e. a very limited knowledge of their characteristics might be required. In this paper, we study T2TF for a single target vehicle, tracked by two generic sensors, differing in kinematic tracking accuracy. A challenging reference trajectory is simulated consisting of both linear and nonlinear motion segments. The main objective is to compare the performance of different nonlinear sensor fusion algorithms, comprising of several combinations of prediction and measurement update methods. We show that the covariance intersection based update methods outperform the Kalman filter derivatives, as they tend not to produce overly optimistic estimates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF)\",\"volume\":\"1069 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SDF.2019.8916652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SDF.2019.8916652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在高级驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)中,汽车传感器在车辆环境感知中起着至关重要的作用。传感器有其独特的优点和缺点,这使得融合来自不同来源的信息势在必行。这种融合既可以在传感器层面进行,也可以在轨道层面进行。轨道到轨道融合(T2TF)提供了一个很大的优势,因为单个传感器块可以被视为灰色甚至黑盒子,即可能需要非常有限的特征知识。在本文中,我们研究了单个目标车辆的T2TF,由两个通用传感器跟踪,运动跟踪精度不同。模拟了由线性和非线性运动段组成的具有挑战性的参考轨迹。主要目的是比较不同的非线性传感器融合算法的性能,包括几种预测和测量更新方法的组合。我们表明,基于协方差交集的更新方法优于卡尔曼滤波导数,因为它们往往不会产生过于乐观的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Track to Track fusion methods for nonlinear process and measurement models
Automotive sensors play a vital role in the environment perception for vehicles in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). Sensors have their own distinctive advantages and drawbacks, which makes it imperative to fuse information from disparate sources. The fusion can be performed either at the sensor or the track level. Track to track fusion (T2TF) offers a big advantage as individual sensor blocks can be treated as grey or even black boxes i.e. a very limited knowledge of their characteristics might be required. In this paper, we study T2TF for a single target vehicle, tracked by two generic sensors, differing in kinematic tracking accuracy. A challenging reference trajectory is simulated consisting of both linear and nonlinear motion segments. The main objective is to compare the performance of different nonlinear sensor fusion algorithms, comprising of several combinations of prediction and measurement update methods. We show that the covariance intersection based update methods outperform the Kalman filter derivatives, as they tend not to produce overly optimistic estimates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信