基于事件的表征和推理在语言中的作用

J. Pustejovsky
{"title":"基于事件的表征和推理在语言中的作用","authors":"J. Pustejovsky","doi":"10.1017/9781108854221.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This chapter briefly reviews the research conducted on the representation of events, from the perspectives of natural language processing, artificial intelligence (AI), and linguistics. AI approaches to modeling change have traditionally focused on situations and state descriptions. Linguistic approaches start with the description of the propositional content of sentences (or natural language expressions generally). As a result, the focus in the two fields has been on different problems. Namely, linguistic theories try to maintain compositionality in the expressions associated with linguistic units, or what is known as semantic compositionality . In AI and in the planning community in particular the focus has been on maintaining compositionality in the way plans are constructed, as well as the correctness of the algorithm that searches and traverses the state space. This can be called plan compositionality . I argue that these approaches have common elements that can be drawn on to view event semantics from a unifying perspective, where we can distinguish between the surface events denoted by verbal predicates and what I refer to as the latent event structure of a sentence. Latent events within a text refer to the finer-grained subeventual representations of events denoted by verbs or nominal expressions, as well as to hidden events connoted by nouns. By clearly distinguishing between surface and latent event structures of sentences and texts, we move closer to a general computational theory of event structure, one permitting a common vocabulary for events and the relations between them, while enabling reasoning at multiple levels of interpretation.","PeriodicalId":170332,"journal":{"name":"Computational Analysis of Storylines","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Event-Based Representations and Reasoning in Language\",\"authors\":\"J. Pustejovsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108854221.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". This chapter briefly reviews the research conducted on the representation of events, from the perspectives of natural language processing, artificial intelligence (AI), and linguistics. AI approaches to modeling change have traditionally focused on situations and state descriptions. Linguistic approaches start with the description of the propositional content of sentences (or natural language expressions generally). As a result, the focus in the two fields has been on different problems. Namely, linguistic theories try to maintain compositionality in the expressions associated with linguistic units, or what is known as semantic compositionality . In AI and in the planning community in particular the focus has been on maintaining compositionality in the way plans are constructed, as well as the correctness of the algorithm that searches and traverses the state space. This can be called plan compositionality . I argue that these approaches have common elements that can be drawn on to view event semantics from a unifying perspective, where we can distinguish between the surface events denoted by verbal predicates and what I refer to as the latent event structure of a sentence. Latent events within a text refer to the finer-grained subeventual representations of events denoted by verbs or nominal expressions, as well as to hidden events connoted by nouns. By clearly distinguishing between surface and latent event structures of sentences and texts, we move closer to a general computational theory of event structure, one permitting a common vocabulary for events and the relations between them, while enabling reasoning at multiple levels of interpretation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Analysis of Storylines\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Analysis of Storylines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108854221.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Analysis of Storylines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108854221.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

. 本章从自然语言处理、人工智能(AI)和语言学的角度简要回顾了事件表征方面的研究。人工智能对变化建模的方法传统上关注于情境和状态描述。语言学方法从描述句子(或一般的自然语言表达)的命题内容开始。因此,这两个领域的重点一直是不同的问题。也就是说,语言学理论试图在与语言单位相关的表达中保持组合性,即所谓的语义组合性。在人工智能和规划社区中,重点是保持规划构建方式的组合性,以及搜索和遍历状态空间的算法的正确性。这可以称为计划组合性。我认为,这些方法都有共同的元素,可以从一个统一的角度来看待事件语义,我们可以区分由言语谓词表示的表面事件和我所说的句子的潜在事件结构。文本中的潜在事件指的是由动词或名义表达式表示的事件的细粒度子最终表示,以及由名词表示的隐藏事件。通过清楚地区分句子和文本的表面和潜在事件结构,我们更接近于事件结构的一般计算理论,一个允许事件及其之间关系的通用词汇表,同时允许多层次解释的推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Event-Based Representations and Reasoning in Language
. This chapter briefly reviews the research conducted on the representation of events, from the perspectives of natural language processing, artificial intelligence (AI), and linguistics. AI approaches to modeling change have traditionally focused on situations and state descriptions. Linguistic approaches start with the description of the propositional content of sentences (or natural language expressions generally). As a result, the focus in the two fields has been on different problems. Namely, linguistic theories try to maintain compositionality in the expressions associated with linguistic units, or what is known as semantic compositionality . In AI and in the planning community in particular the focus has been on maintaining compositionality in the way plans are constructed, as well as the correctness of the algorithm that searches and traverses the state space. This can be called plan compositionality . I argue that these approaches have common elements that can be drawn on to view event semantics from a unifying perspective, where we can distinguish between the surface events denoted by verbal predicates and what I refer to as the latent event structure of a sentence. Latent events within a text refer to the finer-grained subeventual representations of events denoted by verbs or nominal expressions, as well as to hidden events connoted by nouns. By clearly distinguishing between surface and latent event structures of sentences and texts, we move closer to a general computational theory of event structure, one permitting a common vocabulary for events and the relations between them, while enabling reasoning at multiple levels of interpretation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信