{"title":"有害藻华的成因","authors":"P. Glibert, J. Burkholder","doi":"10.1002/9781118994672.CH1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much has been written about the underlying causes of harmful algal blooms (HAB), the complex interplay of factors that lead to their proliferation, and the unique set(s) of factors contributing to blooms of different species of algae. In general, the overarching causes that have received much attention in the literature include degradation of water quality and increasing eutrophication; increasing aquaculture operations; transport of harmful species via ballast water or shellfish seeding, leading to new introductions; and climate change (e.g., Hallegraeff and Bolch, 1992; Hallegraeff, 1993; Anderson et al., 2002; Glibert et al., 2005, 2014a; Heisler et al., 2008; Wells et al., 2016; and references therein). This chapter reviews these complexities while highlighting the key role of changes in nutrients; estuarine/marine microalgal species are emphasized, and information is also included on some freshwater HAB. While some have suggested that increased monitoring or surveillance has led to a perception of an increase in HAB, there is now compelling evidence from many regions showing conclusively that increases in HAB proliferations are real, not sampling artifacts (Heisler et al., 2008). What is a HAB? In his seminal paper, Smayda (1997a, p. 1135) stated, “What constitutes a bloom . . . has regional, seasonal, and speciesspecific aspects; it is not simply a biomass issue. . . . The salient criterion to use in defining whether a ‘harmful’ species is in bloom and the distinctive feature of such blooms lie not in the level of abundance, but whether its occurrence has harmful consequences.” Since the publication of that paper, biomass criteria for a few HAB species have been defined, but more generally HAB continue to be defined in terms of the extent to which they cause harmful events (fish kills), toxic events (shellfish and finfish poisoning), ecosystem disruption (nutritional and/or prey-size mismatches, such as picocyanobacterial blooms), or large biomass events (hypoxia or anoxia). In all cases, for a HAB to occur, the HAB species must be present and its biomass relative to other species in the assemblage changes, although the HAB species does not need to be dominant or in high abundance to elicit some of these effects. In general, the factors that promote HAB can be reduced to two: changes in the rate of introductions of species to new areas and changes in local conditions leading to conditions more conducive to the growth of individual species. Environmental changes can be subtle and not all factors may change together, leading in some cases to situations where one factor may seem to be favorable, but growth is impaired due to a change in another factor. The success of an introduced species in a new environment is not ensured; instead, there must be a match of environmental factors and the species capable of exploiting the environment. As Smayda (2002) also wrote,","PeriodicalId":322500,"journal":{"name":"Harmful Algal Blooms","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causes of Harmful Algal Blooms\",\"authors\":\"P. Glibert, J. Burkholder\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9781118994672.CH1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Much has been written about the underlying causes of harmful algal blooms (HAB), the complex interplay of factors that lead to their proliferation, and the unique set(s) of factors contributing to blooms of different species of algae. In general, the overarching causes that have received much attention in the literature include degradation of water quality and increasing eutrophication; increasing aquaculture operations; transport of harmful species via ballast water or shellfish seeding, leading to new introductions; and climate change (e.g., Hallegraeff and Bolch, 1992; Hallegraeff, 1993; Anderson et al., 2002; Glibert et al., 2005, 2014a; Heisler et al., 2008; Wells et al., 2016; and references therein). This chapter reviews these complexities while highlighting the key role of changes in nutrients; estuarine/marine microalgal species are emphasized, and information is also included on some freshwater HAB. While some have suggested that increased monitoring or surveillance has led to a perception of an increase in HAB, there is now compelling evidence from many regions showing conclusively that increases in HAB proliferations are real, not sampling artifacts (Heisler et al., 2008). What is a HAB? In his seminal paper, Smayda (1997a, p. 1135) stated, “What constitutes a bloom . . . has regional, seasonal, and speciesspecific aspects; it is not simply a biomass issue. . . . The salient criterion to use in defining whether a ‘harmful’ species is in bloom and the distinctive feature of such blooms lie not in the level of abundance, but whether its occurrence has harmful consequences.” Since the publication of that paper, biomass criteria for a few HAB species have been defined, but more generally HAB continue to be defined in terms of the extent to which they cause harmful events (fish kills), toxic events (shellfish and finfish poisoning), ecosystem disruption (nutritional and/or prey-size mismatches, such as picocyanobacterial blooms), or large biomass events (hypoxia or anoxia). In all cases, for a HAB to occur, the HAB species must be present and its biomass relative to other species in the assemblage changes, although the HAB species does not need to be dominant or in high abundance to elicit some of these effects. In general, the factors that promote HAB can be reduced to two: changes in the rate of introductions of species to new areas and changes in local conditions leading to conditions more conducive to the growth of individual species. Environmental changes can be subtle and not all factors may change together, leading in some cases to situations where one factor may seem to be favorable, but growth is impaired due to a change in another factor. The success of an introduced species in a new environment is not ensured; instead, there must be a match of environmental factors and the species capable of exploiting the environment. As Smayda (2002) also wrote,\",\"PeriodicalId\":322500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harmful Algal Blooms\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harmful Algal Blooms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118994672.CH1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harmful Algal Blooms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118994672.CH1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
摘要
关于有害藻华(HAB)的潜在原因,导致其增殖的因素的复杂相互作用,以及导致不同种类藻类大量繁殖的独特因素,已经写了很多。一般来说,文献中受到广泛关注的主要原因包括水质退化和富营养化加剧;增加水产养殖业务;通过压载水或贝类播种运输有害物种,导致新的引进;和气候变化(例如,Hallegraeff和Bolch, 1992;Hallegraeff, 1993;Anderson et al., 2002;Glibert et al., 2005, 2014 4a;Heisler et al., 2008;Wells等人,2016;以及其中的参考文献)。本章回顾了这些复杂性,同时强调了营养变化的关键作用;强调河口/海洋微藻种类,也包括一些淡水有害藻的资料。虽然有些人认为,加强监测或监测导致了有害藻华增加的感觉,但现在来自许多地区的令人信服的证据确凿地表明,有害藻华增殖的增加是真实的,而不是采样的人工制品(Heisler et al., 2008)。什么是有害藻华?在他的开创性论文中,Smayda (1997a, p. 1135)指出,“是什么构成了一朵花……具有区域性、季节性和物种特异性;这不仅仅是一个生物量问题. . . .定义一种‘有害’物种是否处于水华状态以及这种水华的显著特征不在于其丰富程度,而在于其发生是否会产生有害后果。”自该论文发表以来,已经确定了一些HAB物种的生物量标准,但更普遍的是,HAB继续根据它们引起有害事件(鱼类死亡),毒性事件(贝类和鳍鱼中毒),生态系统破坏(营养和/或猎物大小不匹配,如花青菌繁殖)或大型生物量事件(缺氧或缺氧)的程度来定义。在所有情况下,为了发生有害藻华,必须存在有害藻华物种,并且其相对于组合中其他物种的生物量发生变化,尽管有害藻华物种不需要占主导地位或丰度很高才能引起某些影响。一般来说,促进有害藻华的因素可以归结为两个:物种引进到新地区的速度变化和当地条件的变化导致更有利于单个物种生长的条件。环境变化可能是微妙的,并非所有因素都可能一起变化,在某些情况下,导致一个因素似乎是有利的,但由于另一个因素的变化,增长受到损害。引进物种在新环境中的成功并不能得到保证;相反,必须有环境因素和能够利用环境的物种相匹配。正如斯迈达(2002)也写道:
Much has been written about the underlying causes of harmful algal blooms (HAB), the complex interplay of factors that lead to their proliferation, and the unique set(s) of factors contributing to blooms of different species of algae. In general, the overarching causes that have received much attention in the literature include degradation of water quality and increasing eutrophication; increasing aquaculture operations; transport of harmful species via ballast water or shellfish seeding, leading to new introductions; and climate change (e.g., Hallegraeff and Bolch, 1992; Hallegraeff, 1993; Anderson et al., 2002; Glibert et al., 2005, 2014a; Heisler et al., 2008; Wells et al., 2016; and references therein). This chapter reviews these complexities while highlighting the key role of changes in nutrients; estuarine/marine microalgal species are emphasized, and information is also included on some freshwater HAB. While some have suggested that increased monitoring or surveillance has led to a perception of an increase in HAB, there is now compelling evidence from many regions showing conclusively that increases in HAB proliferations are real, not sampling artifacts (Heisler et al., 2008). What is a HAB? In his seminal paper, Smayda (1997a, p. 1135) stated, “What constitutes a bloom . . . has regional, seasonal, and speciesspecific aspects; it is not simply a biomass issue. . . . The salient criterion to use in defining whether a ‘harmful’ species is in bloom and the distinctive feature of such blooms lie not in the level of abundance, but whether its occurrence has harmful consequences.” Since the publication of that paper, biomass criteria for a few HAB species have been defined, but more generally HAB continue to be defined in terms of the extent to which they cause harmful events (fish kills), toxic events (shellfish and finfish poisoning), ecosystem disruption (nutritional and/or prey-size mismatches, such as picocyanobacterial blooms), or large biomass events (hypoxia or anoxia). In all cases, for a HAB to occur, the HAB species must be present and its biomass relative to other species in the assemblage changes, although the HAB species does not need to be dominant or in high abundance to elicit some of these effects. In general, the factors that promote HAB can be reduced to two: changes in the rate of introductions of species to new areas and changes in local conditions leading to conditions more conducive to the growth of individual species. Environmental changes can be subtle and not all factors may change together, leading in some cases to situations where one factor may seem to be favorable, but growth is impaired due to a change in another factor. The success of an introduced species in a new environment is not ensured; instead, there must be a match of environmental factors and the species capable of exploiting the environment. As Smayda (2002) also wrote,