先验反思与理性重构之间的哲学转变:当代哲学对立的意义

L. Repa
{"title":"先验反思与理性重构之间的哲学转变:当代哲学对立的意义","authors":"L. Repa","doi":"10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n3p698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to show the fundamental differences between Habermas’s and Apel’s projects to transform philosophy. These differences can be measured by comparing Apel’s concept of transcendental reflection and Habermas’s method of rational reconstruction. Based on these differences, it is possible to state that the transformation of philosophy in Apel’s thought means to give another way to the attempt by first philosophy to establish an ultimate foundation for itself and the sciences while the Habermasian concept of reconstruction assigns philosophy the most innovative role of stand-in for scientific theories and interpreter of cultural developments.","PeriodicalId":143268,"journal":{"name":"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy","volume":"600 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A transformação da filosofia entre a reflexão transcendental e a reconstrução racional: sobre o sentido de uma contraposição filosófica contemporânea\",\"authors\":\"L. Repa\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n3p698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article aims to show the fundamental differences between Habermas’s and Apel’s projects to transform philosophy. These differences can be measured by comparing Apel’s concept of transcendental reflection and Habermas’s method of rational reconstruction. Based on these differences, it is possible to state that the transformation of philosophy in Apel’s thought means to give another way to the attempt by first philosophy to establish an ultimate foundation for itself and the sciences while the Habermasian concept of reconstruction assigns philosophy the most innovative role of stand-in for scientific theories and interpreter of cultural developments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"600 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n3p698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n3p698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在揭示哈贝马斯和阿佩尔的哲学转型计划之间的根本区别。这些差异可以通过比较阿佩尔的先验反思概念和哈贝马斯的理性重建方法来衡量。基于这些差异,我们可以这样说,阿佩尔思想中的哲学转型意味着为第一哲学为自身和科学建立终极基础的尝试提供了另一种途径,而哈贝马斯的重建概念则赋予哲学最具创新性的角色,即科学理论的替身和文化发展的解释者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A transformação da filosofia entre a reflexão transcendental e a reconstrução racional: sobre o sentido de uma contraposição filosófica contemporânea
The article aims to show the fundamental differences between Habermas’s and Apel’s projects to transform philosophy. These differences can be measured by comparing Apel’s concept of transcendental reflection and Habermas’s method of rational reconstruction. Based on these differences, it is possible to state that the transformation of philosophy in Apel’s thought means to give another way to the attempt by first philosophy to establish an ultimate foundation for itself and the sciences while the Habermasian concept of reconstruction assigns philosophy the most innovative role of stand-in for scientific theories and interpreter of cultural developments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信