Ramani Gade, Neeraj Sadiq, Shivaraj B Patil, Venkata Rao Y, Raghuveer B, Yamini V, Sindhu P
{"title":"一项关于静脉注射药物制剂不良反应的两年回顾性观察研究","authors":"Ramani Gade, Neeraj Sadiq, Shivaraj B Patil, Venkata Rao Y, Raghuveer B, Yamini V, Sindhu P","doi":"10.53411/jpadr.2021.2.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Adverse drug reactions are the major obstacles to patient safety and drug therapy monitoring. \nObjectives: The present article provides information on intravenous products induced adverse drug reactions collected by spontaneous reporting method through an established pharmacovigilance wing working under NCC-PVPI in an Adverse Drug reaction monitoring center-Nalgonda, Telangana. \nMethods: A total number of 100 intravenous products induced ADRs were collected from different age groups by observational retrospective study for the year January 2018 to December 2019. \nResults: The results showed that the most affected age group was 20-29 yrs (28 %). The major contribution of the gender that exposed to ADRs was female- 73 % Most intravenous product induced ADRs were reported from the Department of OBG (46 %). Drug: Ceftriaxone-induced ADRs were (38 %). The most frequently reported ADR was fever and chills (56 %). Out of 100 ADRs, one was certain, 90 were probable/likely, and the remaining 9 were possible as per the WHO-causality scale. \nConclusions: In the present work, most of the ADRs were because of intravenous antibiotics followed by anesthetic agents, antiepileptic drugs, ringer lactate, dextrose normal saline, and H2 blockers.","PeriodicalId":388338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacovigilance and Drug Research","volume":"314 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A two-year retrospective observational study of adverse drug reactions related to intravenous drug formulations\",\"authors\":\"Ramani Gade, Neeraj Sadiq, Shivaraj B Patil, Venkata Rao Y, Raghuveer B, Yamini V, Sindhu P\",\"doi\":\"10.53411/jpadr.2021.2.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Adverse drug reactions are the major obstacles to patient safety and drug therapy monitoring. \\nObjectives: The present article provides information on intravenous products induced adverse drug reactions collected by spontaneous reporting method through an established pharmacovigilance wing working under NCC-PVPI in an Adverse Drug reaction monitoring center-Nalgonda, Telangana. \\nMethods: A total number of 100 intravenous products induced ADRs were collected from different age groups by observational retrospective study for the year January 2018 to December 2019. \\nResults: The results showed that the most affected age group was 20-29 yrs (28 %). The major contribution of the gender that exposed to ADRs was female- 73 % Most intravenous product induced ADRs were reported from the Department of OBG (46 %). Drug: Ceftriaxone-induced ADRs were (38 %). The most frequently reported ADR was fever and chills (56 %). Out of 100 ADRs, one was certain, 90 were probable/likely, and the remaining 9 were possible as per the WHO-causality scale. \\nConclusions: In the present work, most of the ADRs were because of intravenous antibiotics followed by anesthetic agents, antiepileptic drugs, ringer lactate, dextrose normal saline, and H2 blockers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacovigilance and Drug Research\",\"volume\":\"314 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacovigilance and Drug Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53411/jpadr.2021.2.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacovigilance and Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53411/jpadr.2021.2.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A two-year retrospective observational study of adverse drug reactions related to intravenous drug formulations
Introduction: Adverse drug reactions are the major obstacles to patient safety and drug therapy monitoring.
Objectives: The present article provides information on intravenous products induced adverse drug reactions collected by spontaneous reporting method through an established pharmacovigilance wing working under NCC-PVPI in an Adverse Drug reaction monitoring center-Nalgonda, Telangana.
Methods: A total number of 100 intravenous products induced ADRs were collected from different age groups by observational retrospective study for the year January 2018 to December 2019.
Results: The results showed that the most affected age group was 20-29 yrs (28 %). The major contribution of the gender that exposed to ADRs was female- 73 % Most intravenous product induced ADRs were reported from the Department of OBG (46 %). Drug: Ceftriaxone-induced ADRs were (38 %). The most frequently reported ADR was fever and chills (56 %). Out of 100 ADRs, one was certain, 90 were probable/likely, and the remaining 9 were possible as per the WHO-causality scale.
Conclusions: In the present work, most of the ADRs were because of intravenous antibiotics followed by anesthetic agents, antiepileptic drugs, ringer lactate, dextrose normal saline, and H2 blockers.