一项关于静脉注射药物制剂不良反应的两年回顾性观察研究

Ramani Gade, Neeraj Sadiq, Shivaraj B Patil, Venkata Rao Y, Raghuveer B, Yamini V, Sindhu P
{"title":"一项关于静脉注射药物制剂不良反应的两年回顾性观察研究","authors":"Ramani Gade, Neeraj Sadiq, Shivaraj B Patil, Venkata Rao Y, Raghuveer B, Yamini V, Sindhu P","doi":"10.53411/jpadr.2021.2.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Adverse drug reactions are the major obstacles to patient safety and drug therapy monitoring. \nObjectives: The present article provides information on intravenous products induced adverse drug reactions collected by spontaneous reporting method through an established pharmacovigilance wing working under NCC-PVPI in an Adverse Drug reaction monitoring center-Nalgonda, Telangana. \nMethods: A total number of 100 intravenous products induced ADRs were collected from different age groups by observational retrospective study for the year January 2018 to December 2019. \nResults: The results showed that the most affected age group was 20-29 yrs (28 %). The major contribution of the gender that exposed to ADRs was female- 73 % Most intravenous product induced ADRs were reported from the Department of OBG (46 %). Drug: Ceftriaxone-induced ADRs were (38 %). The most frequently reported ADR was fever and chills (56 %). Out of 100 ADRs, one was certain, 90 were probable/likely, and the remaining 9 were possible as per the WHO-causality scale. \nConclusions: In the present work, most of the ADRs were because of intravenous antibiotics followed by anesthetic agents, antiepileptic drugs, ringer lactate, dextrose normal saline, and H2 blockers.","PeriodicalId":388338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacovigilance and Drug Research","volume":"314 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A two-year retrospective observational study of adverse drug reactions related to intravenous drug formulations\",\"authors\":\"Ramani Gade, Neeraj Sadiq, Shivaraj B Patil, Venkata Rao Y, Raghuveer B, Yamini V, Sindhu P\",\"doi\":\"10.53411/jpadr.2021.2.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Adverse drug reactions are the major obstacles to patient safety and drug therapy monitoring. \\nObjectives: The present article provides information on intravenous products induced adverse drug reactions collected by spontaneous reporting method through an established pharmacovigilance wing working under NCC-PVPI in an Adverse Drug reaction monitoring center-Nalgonda, Telangana. \\nMethods: A total number of 100 intravenous products induced ADRs were collected from different age groups by observational retrospective study for the year January 2018 to December 2019. \\nResults: The results showed that the most affected age group was 20-29 yrs (28 %). The major contribution of the gender that exposed to ADRs was female- 73 % Most intravenous product induced ADRs were reported from the Department of OBG (46 %). Drug: Ceftriaxone-induced ADRs were (38 %). The most frequently reported ADR was fever and chills (56 %). Out of 100 ADRs, one was certain, 90 were probable/likely, and the remaining 9 were possible as per the WHO-causality scale. \\nConclusions: In the present work, most of the ADRs were because of intravenous antibiotics followed by anesthetic agents, antiepileptic drugs, ringer lactate, dextrose normal saline, and H2 blockers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacovigilance and Drug Research\",\"volume\":\"314 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacovigilance and Drug Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53411/jpadr.2021.2.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacovigilance and Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53411/jpadr.2021.2.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物不良反应是影响患者安全和药物治疗监测的主要障碍。目的:本文通过NCC-PVPI在泰伦加纳纳尔贡达药物不良反应监测中心建立的药物警戒部门,通过自发报告法收集静脉注射产品引起的药物不良反应的信息。方法:采用观察性回顾性研究方法,收集2018年1月至2019年12月不同年龄段静脉注射产品引起的不良反应100例。结果:以20 ~ 29岁年龄组发病率最高(28%)。暴露于不良反应的主要性别为女性(73%),大多数静脉注射产品引起的不良反应报告来自OBG部门(46%)。药物:头孢曲松引起的不良反应为(38%)。最常见的不良反应是发热和发冷(56%)。在100种不良反应中,1种是肯定的,90种是可能的,其余9种根据世卫组织因果关系量表是可能的。结论:在本工作中,静脉注射抗生素引起的不良反应最多,其次是麻醉剂、抗癫痫药物、乳酸林格盐、葡萄糖生理盐水和H2阻滞剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A two-year retrospective observational study of adverse drug reactions related to intravenous drug formulations
Introduction: Adverse drug reactions are the major obstacles to patient safety and drug therapy monitoring. Objectives: The present article provides information on intravenous products induced adverse drug reactions collected by spontaneous reporting method through an established pharmacovigilance wing working under NCC-PVPI in an Adverse Drug reaction monitoring center-Nalgonda, Telangana. Methods: A total number of 100 intravenous products induced ADRs were collected from different age groups by observational retrospective study for the year January 2018 to December 2019. Results: The results showed that the most affected age group was 20-29 yrs (28 %). The major contribution of the gender that exposed to ADRs was female- 73 % Most intravenous product induced ADRs were reported from the Department of OBG (46 %). Drug: Ceftriaxone-induced ADRs were (38 %). The most frequently reported ADR was fever and chills (56 %). Out of 100 ADRs, one was certain, 90 were probable/likely, and the remaining 9 were possible as per the WHO-causality scale. Conclusions: In the present work, most of the ADRs were because of intravenous antibiotics followed by anesthetic agents, antiepileptic drugs, ringer lactate, dextrose normal saline, and H2 blockers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信