安全的政治化:争议、动员、舞台转移。

J. Hagmann, Hendrik Hegemann, Andrew W Neal
{"title":"安全的政治化:争议、动员、舞台转移。","authors":"J. Hagmann, Hendrik Hegemann, Andrew W Neal","doi":"10.3224/ERIS.V5I3.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While security has always been political, it has for the most part been considered a special kind of politics that closes down political activity and debate. This introduction reviews recent theoretical and empirical developments to argue that a research agenda that re-engages security through the prism of politicisation is better able to elucidate the growing range of actors, arenas and arguments visible in contemporary security governance. Based on recent literatures from Political Science and European Studies that – so far – have been largely ignored by Security Studies, it develops an analytical framework around three dimensions: controversy, mobilisation and arena-shifting. It showcases the relevance of this perspective through brief empirical illustrations on the post-Snowden controversy, public participation on security strategy-making, and the role of parliaments in security policy. The overall aim is to reopen conceptual questions on the relationship between security and politics, inspire innovative empirical work to study the diverse politics around security, and allow for more differentiated normative inquiries into the ambivalent consequences of politicisation.","PeriodicalId":179359,"journal":{"name":"Special Issue: The Politicisation of Security: Controversy, Mobilisation, Arena Shifting","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Politicisation of Security: Controversy, Mobilisation, Arena Shifting.\",\"authors\":\"J. Hagmann, Hendrik Hegemann, Andrew W Neal\",\"doi\":\"10.3224/ERIS.V5I3.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While security has always been political, it has for the most part been considered a special kind of politics that closes down political activity and debate. This introduction reviews recent theoretical and empirical developments to argue that a research agenda that re-engages security through the prism of politicisation is better able to elucidate the growing range of actors, arenas and arguments visible in contemporary security governance. Based on recent literatures from Political Science and European Studies that – so far – have been largely ignored by Security Studies, it develops an analytical framework around three dimensions: controversy, mobilisation and arena-shifting. It showcases the relevance of this perspective through brief empirical illustrations on the post-Snowden controversy, public participation on security strategy-making, and the role of parliaments in security policy. The overall aim is to reopen conceptual questions on the relationship between security and politics, inspire innovative empirical work to study the diverse politics around security, and allow for more differentiated normative inquiries into the ambivalent consequences of politicisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Special Issue: The Politicisation of Security: Controversy, Mobilisation, Arena Shifting\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Special Issue: The Politicisation of Security: Controversy, Mobilisation, Arena Shifting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3224/ERIS.V5I3.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Issue: The Politicisation of Security: Controversy, Mobilisation, Arena Shifting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3224/ERIS.V5I3.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

虽然安全一直是政治性的,但它在很大程度上被认为是一种特殊的政治,它关闭了政治活动和辩论。本引言回顾了最近的理论和实证发展,认为通过政治化的棱镜重新参与安全的研究议程能够更好地阐明当代安全治理中可见的越来越多的行动者、领域和论点。基于政治科学和欧洲研究的最新文献——迄今为止——在很大程度上被安全研究所忽视——它围绕三个维度发展了一个分析框架:争议、动员和舞台转移。本书通过对斯诺登事件后的争议、公众参与安全战略制定以及议会在安全政策中的作用的简要实证说明,展示了这一观点的相关性。总体目标是重新审视安全和政治之间关系的概念问题,激发创新的实证工作来研究围绕安全的各种政治,并允许对政治化的矛盾后果进行更有区别的规范调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Politicisation of Security: Controversy, Mobilisation, Arena Shifting.
While security has always been political, it has for the most part been considered a special kind of politics that closes down political activity and debate. This introduction reviews recent theoretical and empirical developments to argue that a research agenda that re-engages security through the prism of politicisation is better able to elucidate the growing range of actors, arenas and arguments visible in contemporary security governance. Based on recent literatures from Political Science and European Studies that – so far – have been largely ignored by Security Studies, it develops an analytical framework around three dimensions: controversy, mobilisation and arena-shifting. It showcases the relevance of this perspective through brief empirical illustrations on the post-Snowden controversy, public participation on security strategy-making, and the role of parliaments in security policy. The overall aim is to reopen conceptual questions on the relationship between security and politics, inspire innovative empirical work to study the diverse politics around security, and allow for more differentiated normative inquiries into the ambivalent consequences of politicisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信