堆肥在常规混凝土中部分替代细骨料的可行性研究

S. Vanitha
{"title":"堆肥在常规混凝土中部分替代细骨料的可行性研究","authors":"S. Vanitha","doi":"10.21741/9781644901953-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Solid waste management is the biggest challenge due to population growth. Lack of awareness about onsite processing of solid waste implies production of huge quantity of solid waste which is unmanageable. In this study an attempt is made to utilize the degraded solid waste called compost which is collected from municipal site and is used as a filler material in concrete. Compost is replaced for fine aggregate with 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% in conventional concrete. The compressive strength results at the age of 28 days are 30.5, 19.8, 16.8 and 18.2 N/mm2 respectively. Result indicates 5% replacement of compost is effective in concrete. The concrete specimen made with compost (CVC) and conventional concrete (CC) are exposed to an elevated temperature of 200°C, 400°C, 600°C and 800°C respectively. Result indicates the conventional concrete shows 5.3%, 6.1%, 15% and 24% compressive strength loss whereas 5% compost replaced specimen shows 10%, 11 %, 23.2% and 58.2% respectively. At an elevated temperature, both conventional concrete and compost-based concrete lost its strength. The reason could be thermal incompatibility between the aggregates and concrete. However, the loss of compressive strength is almost double in CVC than CC. The possible reason could be volatile compounds may evaporate in CVC at high temperature. The weight lost is observed in CC varies from 2.4 % to 4.5 % whereas CVC shows 6% to 7% from 200°C to 800°C. Weight lost is 3% more in CVC specimen than CC specimen.","PeriodicalId":135346,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Materials and Smart Practices","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility Study on Utilization of Compost as a Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate in Conventional Concrete\",\"authors\":\"S. Vanitha\",\"doi\":\"10.21741/9781644901953-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Solid waste management is the biggest challenge due to population growth. Lack of awareness about onsite processing of solid waste implies production of huge quantity of solid waste which is unmanageable. In this study an attempt is made to utilize the degraded solid waste called compost which is collected from municipal site and is used as a filler material in concrete. Compost is replaced for fine aggregate with 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% in conventional concrete. The compressive strength results at the age of 28 days are 30.5, 19.8, 16.8 and 18.2 N/mm2 respectively. Result indicates 5% replacement of compost is effective in concrete. The concrete specimen made with compost (CVC) and conventional concrete (CC) are exposed to an elevated temperature of 200°C, 400°C, 600°C and 800°C respectively. Result indicates the conventional concrete shows 5.3%, 6.1%, 15% and 24% compressive strength loss whereas 5% compost replaced specimen shows 10%, 11 %, 23.2% and 58.2% respectively. At an elevated temperature, both conventional concrete and compost-based concrete lost its strength. The reason could be thermal incompatibility between the aggregates and concrete. However, the loss of compressive strength is almost double in CVC than CC. The possible reason could be volatile compounds may evaporate in CVC at high temperature. The weight lost is observed in CC varies from 2.4 % to 4.5 % whereas CVC shows 6% to 7% from 200°C to 800°C. Weight lost is 3% more in CVC specimen than CC specimen.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Materials and Smart Practices\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Materials and Smart Practices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644901953-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Materials and Smart Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644901953-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要由于人口增长,固体废物管理是最大的挑战。缺乏对固体废物现场处理的认识意味着产生了大量难以管理的固体废物。在本研究中,试图利用从城市场地收集的降解固体废物堆肥作为混凝土的填充材料。传统混凝土中5%、10%、15%和20%的细骨料代替了堆肥。28 d龄期抗压强度分别为30.5、19.8、16.8和18.2 N/mm2。结果表明,混凝土中添加5%的堆肥是有效的。将堆肥混凝土试件(CVC)和常规混凝土试件(CC)分别置于200℃、400℃、600℃和800℃的高温下。结果表明,常规混凝土的抗压强度损失分别为5.3%、6.1%、15%和24%,而5%堆肥替代试件的抗压强度损失分别为10%、11%、23.2%和58.2%。在高温下,传统混凝土和堆肥混凝土都失去了强度。原因可能是骨料与混凝土之间的热不相容性。然而,CVC的抗压强度损失几乎是CC的两倍,这可能是由于CVC中的挥发性化合物在高温下挥发。从200°C到800°C, CC的重量损失在2.4%到4.5%之间,而CVC的重量损失在6%到7%之间。CVC组的减重比CC组多3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility Study on Utilization of Compost as a Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate in Conventional Concrete
Abstract. Solid waste management is the biggest challenge due to population growth. Lack of awareness about onsite processing of solid waste implies production of huge quantity of solid waste which is unmanageable. In this study an attempt is made to utilize the degraded solid waste called compost which is collected from municipal site and is used as a filler material in concrete. Compost is replaced for fine aggregate with 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% in conventional concrete. The compressive strength results at the age of 28 days are 30.5, 19.8, 16.8 and 18.2 N/mm2 respectively. Result indicates 5% replacement of compost is effective in concrete. The concrete specimen made with compost (CVC) and conventional concrete (CC) are exposed to an elevated temperature of 200°C, 400°C, 600°C and 800°C respectively. Result indicates the conventional concrete shows 5.3%, 6.1%, 15% and 24% compressive strength loss whereas 5% compost replaced specimen shows 10%, 11 %, 23.2% and 58.2% respectively. At an elevated temperature, both conventional concrete and compost-based concrete lost its strength. The reason could be thermal incompatibility between the aggregates and concrete. However, the loss of compressive strength is almost double in CVC than CC. The possible reason could be volatile compounds may evaporate in CVC at high temperature. The weight lost is observed in CC varies from 2.4 % to 4.5 % whereas CVC shows 6% to 7% from 200°C to 800°C. Weight lost is 3% more in CVC specimen than CC specimen.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信