坚强的脊柱,脆弱的腹部:CFI微软的决定

Harry First
{"title":"坚强的脊柱,脆弱的腹部:CFI微软的决定","authors":"Harry First","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1020850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The CFIA¢â‚¬â„¢s decision in Microsoft came as something of a surprise. In the run-up to its issuance, commentators had been predicting some sort of A¢â‚¬A“split-the-differenceA¢â‚¬Â approach, seeing the Court as most likely upholding the CommissionA¢â‚¬â„¢s decision on MicrosoftA¢â‚¬â„¢s refusal to supply interoperability information to Sun but reversing its decision on MicrosoftA¢â‚¬â„¢s refusal to dis-integrate Windows and the Windows Media Player. I thought the opposite.","PeriodicalId":281709,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual Property Law eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strong Spine, Weak Underbelly: The CFI Microsoft Decision\",\"authors\":\"Harry First\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1020850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The CFIA¢â‚¬â„¢s decision in Microsoft came as something of a surprise. In the run-up to its issuance, commentators had been predicting some sort of A¢â‚¬A“split-the-differenceA¢â‚¬Â approach, seeing the Court as most likely upholding the CommissionA¢â‚¬â„¢s decision on MicrosoftA¢â‚¬â„¢s refusal to supply interoperability information to Sun but reversing its decision on MicrosoftA¢â‚¬â„¢s refusal to dis-integrate Windows and the Windows Media Player. I thought the opposite.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intellectual Property Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intellectual Property Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1020850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual Property Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1020850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

CFIA对微软的决定有些出人意料。在其发布的准备阶段,评论员们已经预测了某种形式的A¢,¬“分裂差异”的方式,认为法院最有可能支持委员会对微软的决定,¬,¬拒绝向Sun提供互操作性信息,但推翻其对微软的决定,¬拒绝分解Windows和Windows媒体播放器。我的想法正好相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strong Spine, Weak Underbelly: The CFI Microsoft Decision
The CFIA¢â‚¬â„¢s decision in Microsoft came as something of a surprise. In the run-up to its issuance, commentators had been predicting some sort of A¢â‚¬A“split-the-differenceA¢â‚¬Â approach, seeing the Court as most likely upholding the CommissionA¢â‚¬â„¢s decision on MicrosoftA¢â‚¬â„¢s refusal to supply interoperability information to Sun but reversing its decision on MicrosoftA¢â‚¬â„¢s refusal to dis-integrate Windows and the Windows Media Player. I thought the opposite.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信