埃涅阿斯·西尔维厄斯·皮科洛米尼和匈牙利王位继承

Endre Sashalmi
{"title":"埃涅阿斯·西尔维厄斯·皮科洛米尼和匈牙利王位继承","authors":"Endre Sashalmi","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2011.06.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The words taken as the motto of the study are quoted from the letter written by Aeneas Sylvius Piccolomini in 1445 who was in the service of Frederick III at that time. The letter was addressed to the Archbishop of Esztergom with the purpose to persuade him and the magnates of Hungary to accept Ladislaus Postnatus (the relative of Frederick III) King of Hungary. Piccolomini’s argument, in the last resort, is based on the principle of public utility which is well attested by the motto: internal discord and division on the one hand, external threat on the other, postulate the necessity of a king − this is the dominant motif of the letter. Arguing in favour of royal government he states that monarchy is more appropriate for the Hungarians than popular government because of Hungary’s long tradition of being a kingdom. Citing different proofs such as ius gentium, papal disposition, ancient observation as the grounds of Ladislaus’s hereditary right, the view of the author can be seen as a learned discussion of the problem of succession in general since Piccolomini was one of the most erudite intellectuals of his age.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aeneas Sylvius Piccolomini and the Hungarian Succession\",\"authors\":\"Endre Sashalmi\",\"doi\":\"10.15170/spmnnv.2011.06.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The words taken as the motto of the study are quoted from the letter written by Aeneas Sylvius Piccolomini in 1445 who was in the service of Frederick III at that time. The letter was addressed to the Archbishop of Esztergom with the purpose to persuade him and the magnates of Hungary to accept Ladislaus Postnatus (the relative of Frederick III) King of Hungary. Piccolomini’s argument, in the last resort, is based on the principle of public utility which is well attested by the motto: internal discord and division on the one hand, external threat on the other, postulate the necessity of a king − this is the dominant motif of the letter. Arguing in favour of royal government he states that monarchy is more appropriate for the Hungarians than popular government because of Hungary’s long tradition of being a kingdom. Citing different proofs such as ius gentium, papal disposition, ancient observation as the grounds of Ladislaus’s hereditary right, the view of the author can be seen as a learned discussion of the problem of succession in general since Piccolomini was one of the most erudite intellectuals of his age.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2011.06.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2011.06.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究所的座右铭是1445年腓特烈三世手下的埃涅阿斯·西尔维乌斯·皮科洛米尼写的信中引用的。这封信是写给埃斯泰尔戈姆大主教的,目的是说服他和匈牙利的权贵们接受拉迪斯劳斯·波斯特纳图斯(腓特烈三世的亲戚)为匈牙利国王。皮科洛米尼的论点,归根到底,是建立在公共利益原则的基础上的,这句格言很好地证明了这一点:一方面是内部的纷争和分裂,另一方面是外部的威胁,因此必须有一个国王——这是这封信的主要主题。在支持王室政府的争论中,他指出,由于匈牙利作为一个王国的悠久传统,君主政体比人民政府更适合匈牙利人。由于皮科洛米尼是他那个时代最博学的知识分子之一,作者的观点可以被看作是对继承问题的一种博学的讨论,他引用了诸如ius gentium、pope disposition、ancient observation等不同的证据作为拉迪斯劳斯世袭权的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aeneas Sylvius Piccolomini and the Hungarian Succession
The words taken as the motto of the study are quoted from the letter written by Aeneas Sylvius Piccolomini in 1445 who was in the service of Frederick III at that time. The letter was addressed to the Archbishop of Esztergom with the purpose to persuade him and the magnates of Hungary to accept Ladislaus Postnatus (the relative of Frederick III) King of Hungary. Piccolomini’s argument, in the last resort, is based on the principle of public utility which is well attested by the motto: internal discord and division on the one hand, external threat on the other, postulate the necessity of a king − this is the dominant motif of the letter. Arguing in favour of royal government he states that monarchy is more appropriate for the Hungarians than popular government because of Hungary’s long tradition of being a kingdom. Citing different proofs such as ius gentium, papal disposition, ancient observation as the grounds of Ladislaus’s hereditary right, the view of the author can be seen as a learned discussion of the problem of succession in general since Piccolomini was one of the most erudite intellectuals of his age.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信