{"title":"使用替代(非司法手段)对国家执行投资裁决","authors":"J. Viñuales, Dolores Bentolila","doi":"10.1163/9789004209985_014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a rule States comply with investment awards. Yet, in some cases, the enforcement of such awards has proved to be difficult. This chapter focuses on the interaction between judicial and non-judicial means of enforcing investment awards. Specifically, it analyses a variety of “alternative” or “non-judicial” means that can be used either as a supplement to the judicial framework for enforcement or on a stand-alone basis, when judicial enforcement has been pursued unsuccessfully.","PeriodicalId":365224,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Investment (Topic)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Alternative (Non-Judicial Means) to Enforce Investment Awards Against States\",\"authors\":\"J. Viñuales, Dolores Bentolila\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004209985_014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a rule States comply with investment awards. Yet, in some cases, the enforcement of such awards has proved to be difficult. This chapter focuses on the interaction between judicial and non-judicial means of enforcing investment awards. Specifically, it analyses a variety of “alternative” or “non-judicial” means that can be used either as a supplement to the judicial framework for enforcement or on a stand-alone basis, when judicial enforcement has been pursued unsuccessfully.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Investment (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Investment (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004209985_014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Investment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004209985_014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Use of Alternative (Non-Judicial Means) to Enforce Investment Awards Against States
As a rule States comply with investment awards. Yet, in some cases, the enforcement of such awards has proved to be difficult. This chapter focuses on the interaction between judicial and non-judicial means of enforcing investment awards. Specifically, it analyses a variety of “alternative” or “non-judicial” means that can be used either as a supplement to the judicial framework for enforcement or on a stand-alone basis, when judicial enforcement has been pursued unsuccessfully.