破解中国

B. Ho
{"title":"破解中国","authors":"B. Ho","doi":"10.5117/9789463725149_ch07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines Singaporean elite perspectives towards China and\n how China’s rise is understood and debated in Singapore. It argues that\n Singapore’s reading of China’s rise is broadly divided into three schools\n that parallel theories of mainstream international relations, namely, the\n realist, economic institutionalist, and the constructivist positions. By\n analyzing the views put forth by three Singaporean thought leaders that\n are representative of each of these schools, the chapter argues that at\n the crux of Singapore’s perspectives on China is a contestation between\n these three schools of thought as well as the extent to which Singapore\n perceives China as exceptional.","PeriodicalId":164335,"journal":{"name":"China’s Political Worldview and Chinese Exceptionalism","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deciphering China\",\"authors\":\"B. Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/9789463725149_ch07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter examines Singaporean elite perspectives towards China and\\n how China’s rise is understood and debated in Singapore. It argues that\\n Singapore’s reading of China’s rise is broadly divided into three schools\\n that parallel theories of mainstream international relations, namely, the\\n realist, economic institutionalist, and the constructivist positions. By\\n analyzing the views put forth by three Singaporean thought leaders that\\n are representative of each of these schools, the chapter argues that at\\n the crux of Singapore’s perspectives on China is a contestation between\\n these three schools of thought as well as the extent to which Singapore\\n perceives China as exceptional.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China’s Political Worldview and Chinese Exceptionalism\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China’s Political Worldview and Chinese Exceptionalism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463725149_ch07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China’s Political Worldview and Chinese Exceptionalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463725149_ch07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章探讨新加坡精英对中国的看法,以及新加坡如何理解和讨论中国的崛起。文章认为,新加坡对中国崛起的解读大致可分为与主流国际关系理论平行的三个学派,即现实主义、经济制度主义和建构主义立场。本章通过分析代表这三种学派的三位新加坡思想领袖所提出的观点,认为新加坡对中国的看法的关键是这三种学派之间的争论,以及新加坡在多大程度上认为中国是例外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deciphering China
This chapter examines Singaporean elite perspectives towards China and how China’s rise is understood and debated in Singapore. It argues that Singapore’s reading of China’s rise is broadly divided into three schools that parallel theories of mainstream international relations, namely, the realist, economic institutionalist, and the constructivist positions. By analyzing the views put forth by three Singaporean thought leaders that are representative of each of these schools, the chapter argues that at the crux of Singapore’s perspectives on China is a contestation between these three schools of thought as well as the extent to which Singapore perceives China as exceptional.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信