经理过度自信与企业绩效

Xinxin Qiao, Shengyu Xu
{"title":"经理过度自信与企业绩效","authors":"Xinxin Qiao, Shengyu Xu","doi":"10.1109/ICSSSM.2019.8887679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The difference in performance between listed companies is inseparable from the role of “people.” One of the most important characteristics of modern enterprises is the separation of the two rights of ownership and management rights, which leads managers to have a decisive influence on corporate behavior. The theoretical research of traditional economics is centered around the assumption of “rational man”. However, with the appearance of the last many visions in the financial market, scholars began to express doubts about rational economic people. Overconfidence is the most stable and significant feature of the manager. This paper defines the manager's overconfidence by the earnings forecast bias method, and uses the OLS model to empirically test the impact of managerial overconfidence on company performance. Taking into account China's special economic background, this paper groups the nature of property rights and conducts group regression. The empirical results show that overall managerial overconfidence has a significant negative effect on company performance. This utility is still significant in private holding companies, but not significant in state-owned holding companies.","PeriodicalId":442421,"journal":{"name":"2019 16th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manager Overconfidence and Corporate Performance\",\"authors\":\"Xinxin Qiao, Shengyu Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSSSM.2019.8887679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The difference in performance between listed companies is inseparable from the role of “people.” One of the most important characteristics of modern enterprises is the separation of the two rights of ownership and management rights, which leads managers to have a decisive influence on corporate behavior. The theoretical research of traditional economics is centered around the assumption of “rational man”. However, with the appearance of the last many visions in the financial market, scholars began to express doubts about rational economic people. Overconfidence is the most stable and significant feature of the manager. This paper defines the manager's overconfidence by the earnings forecast bias method, and uses the OLS model to empirically test the impact of managerial overconfidence on company performance. Taking into account China's special economic background, this paper groups the nature of property rights and conducts group regression. The empirical results show that overall managerial overconfidence has a significant negative effect on company performance. This utility is still significant in private holding companies, but not significant in state-owned holding companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 16th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 16th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2019.8887679\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 16th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2019.8887679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上市公司绩效的差异离不开“人”的作用。现代企业最重要的特征之一是所有权和经营权两种权利的分离,这使得管理者对企业行为具有决定性的影响。传统经济学的理论研究是围绕着“理性人”的假设展开的。然而,随着金融市场上最后许多幻象的出现,学者们开始对理性的经济人表示怀疑。过度自信是管理者最稳定、最显著的特征。本文采用盈余预测偏差法对管理者过度自信进行定义,并运用OLS模型实证检验管理者过度自信对公司绩效的影响。本文结合中国特殊的经济背景,对产权的性质进行分组,并进行分组回归。实证结果表明,管理者总体过度自信对公司绩效有显著的负向影响。这种效用在私营控股公司中仍然显著,但在国有控股公司中不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Manager Overconfidence and Corporate Performance
The difference in performance between listed companies is inseparable from the role of “people.” One of the most important characteristics of modern enterprises is the separation of the two rights of ownership and management rights, which leads managers to have a decisive influence on corporate behavior. The theoretical research of traditional economics is centered around the assumption of “rational man”. However, with the appearance of the last many visions in the financial market, scholars began to express doubts about rational economic people. Overconfidence is the most stable and significant feature of the manager. This paper defines the manager's overconfidence by the earnings forecast bias method, and uses the OLS model to empirically test the impact of managerial overconfidence on company performance. Taking into account China's special economic background, this paper groups the nature of property rights and conducts group regression. The empirical results show that overall managerial overconfidence has a significant negative effect on company performance. This utility is still significant in private holding companies, but not significant in state-owned holding companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信