佩尔兹曼的无效管制理论

Hak Choi
{"title":"佩尔兹曼的无效管制理论","authors":"Hak Choi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2733454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper shows that Peltzman’s theory of regulation is ineffective: no monopolist will follow his order to lower price and increase output. Faced with lower price, monopolists will only reduce their output. Consumers’ surplus may not increase either. When those unsatisfied consumers have to pay higher price for the product from the black market, overall consumers’ surplus might even drop.","PeriodicalId":138725,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Markets & Investment (Topic)","volume":"157-158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peltzman's Ineffective Theory of Regulation\",\"authors\":\"Hak Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2733454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper shows that Peltzman’s theory of regulation is ineffective: no monopolist will follow his order to lower price and increase output. Faced with lower price, monopolists will only reduce their output. Consumers’ surplus may not increase either. When those unsatisfied consumers have to pay higher price for the product from the black market, overall consumers’ surplus might even drop.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Markets & Investment (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"157-158 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Markets & Investment (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2733454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Markets & Investment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2733454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文证明佩尔兹曼的管制理论是无效的:没有垄断者会按照他的命令降低价格和增加产量。面对更低的价格,垄断者只会减少产量。消费者剩余可能也不会增加。当那些不满意的消费者不得不在黑市上为产品支付更高的价格时,整体消费者剩余甚至可能下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peltzman's Ineffective Theory of Regulation
This paper shows that Peltzman’s theory of regulation is ineffective: no monopolist will follow his order to lower price and increase output. Faced with lower price, monopolists will only reduce their output. Consumers’ surplus may not increase either. When those unsatisfied consumers have to pay higher price for the product from the black market, overall consumers’ surplus might even drop.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信