技术中立作为一种实践:关于宽带和相关结果的两个英国干预措施的讨论

A. Deshpande
{"title":"技术中立作为一种实践:关于宽带和相关结果的两个英国干预措施的讨论","authors":"A. Deshpande","doi":"10.1109/PCTDDE.2018.8624782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses two market interventions in the United Kingdom (UK) to spur activity and growth in the UK fixed-line broadband markets – local loop unbundling (LLU) and the Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK) Superfast Broadband programme. With each of these interventions, the intervening agencies identified the outcomes in terms of specific end-user service objectives such as bandwidth, network coverage or availability rather than underlying technology i.e. both interventions were technology neutral. The paper explores the extent to which technology neutrality as a practice was relevant to the intended outcomes. It does so by combining desk research with the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis of the interventions. This discussion is informed by ideas related to the Osborne effect and identifies a mixed picture of outcomes that needs further investigation.","PeriodicalId":399253,"journal":{"name":"2018 11th CMI International Conference: Prospects and Challenges Towards Developing a Digital Economy within the EU","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology neutrality as a practice: A discussion of two UK interventions on broadband and associated outcomes\",\"authors\":\"A. Deshpande\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PCTDDE.2018.8624782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses two market interventions in the United Kingdom (UK) to spur activity and growth in the UK fixed-line broadband markets – local loop unbundling (LLU) and the Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK) Superfast Broadband programme. With each of these interventions, the intervening agencies identified the outcomes in terms of specific end-user service objectives such as bandwidth, network coverage or availability rather than underlying technology i.e. both interventions were technology neutral. The paper explores the extent to which technology neutrality as a practice was relevant to the intended outcomes. It does so by combining desk research with the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis of the interventions. This discussion is informed by ideas related to the Osborne effect and identifies a mixed picture of outcomes that needs further investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 11th CMI International Conference: Prospects and Challenges Towards Developing a Digital Economy within the EU\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 11th CMI International Conference: Prospects and Challenges Towards Developing a Digital Economy within the EU\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCTDDE.2018.8624782\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 11th CMI International Conference: Prospects and Challenges Towards Developing a Digital Economy within the EU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCTDDE.2018.8624782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了英国(UK)的两种市场干预措施,以刺激英国固定线路宽带市场的活动和增长——本地环路分拆(LLU)和英国宽带交付(BDUK)超高速宽带计划。对于每一种干预措施,干预机构根据具体的终端用户服务目标(如带宽、网络覆盖或可用性)而不是基础技术确定了结果,即两种干预措施都是技术中立的。本文探讨了技术中立性作为一种实践与预期结果相关的程度。它通过将案头研究与干预措施的优势、劣势、机会和威胁(SWOT)分析相结合来做到这一点。这一讨论是由与奥斯本效应相关的观点所启发的,并确定了一幅需要进一步调查的结果的混合图景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technology neutrality as a practice: A discussion of two UK interventions on broadband and associated outcomes
This paper discusses two market interventions in the United Kingdom (UK) to spur activity and growth in the UK fixed-line broadband markets – local loop unbundling (LLU) and the Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK) Superfast Broadband programme. With each of these interventions, the intervening agencies identified the outcomes in terms of specific end-user service objectives such as bandwidth, network coverage or availability rather than underlying technology i.e. both interventions were technology neutral. The paper explores the extent to which technology neutrality as a practice was relevant to the intended outcomes. It does so by combining desk research with the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis of the interventions. This discussion is informed by ideas related to the Osborne effect and identifies a mixed picture of outcomes that needs further investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信