{"title":"“敲门敲门!谁在那里?”学术知识库可用性研究","authors":"A. Mannocci, Miriam Baglioni, P. Manghi","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6906884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Scholarly repositories are the cornerstone of modern open science, and their availability is vital for enacting its practices. To this end, scholarly registries such as FAIRsharing, re3data, OpenDOAR and ROAR give them presence and visibility across different research commu-nities, disciplines, and applications by assigning an identifier and persist-ing their profiles with summary metadata. Alas, like any other resource available on the Web, scholarly repositories, be they tailored for litera-ture, software or data, are quite dynamic and can be frequently changed, moved, merged or discontinued. Therefore, their references are prone to link rot over time, and their availability often boils down to whether the homepage URLs indicated in authoritative repository profiles within scholarly registries respond or not. For this study, we harvested the content of four prominent scholarly registries and resolved over 13 thousand unique repository URLs. By per-forming a quantitative analysis on such an extensive collection of repositories, this paper aims to provide a global snapshot of their availability, which bewilderingly is far from granted.","PeriodicalId":213862,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Knock knock! Who's there?\\\" A study on scholarly repositories' availability\",\"authors\":\"A. Mannocci, Miriam Baglioni, P. Manghi\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/zenodo.6906884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Scholarly repositories are the cornerstone of modern open science, and their availability is vital for enacting its practices. To this end, scholarly registries such as FAIRsharing, re3data, OpenDOAR and ROAR give them presence and visibility across different research commu-nities, disciplines, and applications by assigning an identifier and persist-ing their profiles with summary metadata. Alas, like any other resource available on the Web, scholarly repositories, be they tailored for litera-ture, software or data, are quite dynamic and can be frequently changed, moved, merged or discontinued. Therefore, their references are prone to link rot over time, and their availability often boils down to whether the homepage URLs indicated in authoritative repository profiles within scholarly registries respond or not. For this study, we harvested the content of four prominent scholarly registries and resolved over 13 thousand unique repository URLs. By per-forming a quantitative analysis on such an extensive collection of repositories, this paper aims to provide a global snapshot of their availability, which bewilderingly is far from granted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6906884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6906884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
"Knock knock! Who's there?" A study on scholarly repositories' availability
. Scholarly repositories are the cornerstone of modern open science, and their availability is vital for enacting its practices. To this end, scholarly registries such as FAIRsharing, re3data, OpenDOAR and ROAR give them presence and visibility across different research commu-nities, disciplines, and applications by assigning an identifier and persist-ing their profiles with summary metadata. Alas, like any other resource available on the Web, scholarly repositories, be they tailored for litera-ture, software or data, are quite dynamic and can be frequently changed, moved, merged or discontinued. Therefore, their references are prone to link rot over time, and their availability often boils down to whether the homepage URLs indicated in authoritative repository profiles within scholarly registries respond or not. For this study, we harvested the content of four prominent scholarly registries and resolved over 13 thousand unique repository URLs. By per-forming a quantitative analysis on such an extensive collection of repositories, this paper aims to provide a global snapshot of their availability, which bewilderingly is far from granted.