{"title":"社会学的学术精英:对顶尖研究生课程的重新评估","authors":"J. H. Bair, W. Thompson","doi":"10.17161/STR.1808.4975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Changing Times (1983) listed the top eleven graduate pro grams according to a National Academy of Sciences study. Given the questionable and subjective nature of the evalua tion process which produced these ratings this paper exam ined the composition of the faculties of these top eleven departments. It was found that these departments were sub stantially linked to each other by hiring each others' grad uates, and hence, enhancing each others' reputations.","PeriodicalId":338053,"journal":{"name":"Social thought & research","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Academic Elite in Sociology: A Reassessment of Top-Ranked Graduate Programs\",\"authors\":\"J. H. Bair, W. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.17161/STR.1808.4975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Changing Times (1983) listed the top eleven graduate pro grams according to a National Academy of Sciences study. Given the questionable and subjective nature of the evalua tion process which produced these ratings this paper exam ined the composition of the faculties of these top eleven departments. It was found that these departments were sub stantially linked to each other by hiring each others' grad uates, and hence, enhancing each others' reputations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social thought & research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social thought & research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.4975\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social thought & research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.4975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Academic Elite in Sociology: A Reassessment of Top-Ranked Graduate Programs
Changing Times (1983) listed the top eleven graduate pro grams according to a National Academy of Sciences study. Given the questionable and subjective nature of the evalua tion process which produced these ratings this paper exam ined the composition of the faculties of these top eleven departments. It was found that these departments were sub stantially linked to each other by hiring each others' grad uates, and hence, enhancing each others' reputations.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
