体育研究生课程目标与目的的一致性:通过重要性-绩效分析框架对利益相关者的评估

Bryan M. Nozaleda, Ma. Haidee A. Mabborang
{"title":"体育研究生课程目标与目的的一致性:通过重要性-绩效分析框架对利益相关者的评估","authors":"Bryan M. Nozaleda, Ma. Haidee A. Mabborang","doi":"10.15391/snsv.2023-2.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study assessed the congruency of a graduate physical education program's goals and objectives using the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) framework. The research aimed to identify strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement, ultimately enhancing curriculum and bridging the gap between academia and the physical education and sports industry.\n\nMaterials and Methods: a cross-sectional survey was conducted, utilizing a structured questionnaire distributed to 135 participants classified as internal and external stakeholders selected via purposive convenience sampling. The questionnaire was administered via Google Forms. The questionnaire consisted of items related to stakeholders' demographic profile, awareness, acceptability, and perceived levels of importance and performance of the goals and objectives of the program. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, IPA, and Independent Samples T-test to determine varying perceptions among stakeholders.\n\nResults: The findings indicated a substantial degree of awareness and acceptability of the program's goals and objectives among stakeholders. The study also revealed a strong alignment between the program objectives, graduate school objectives, and the university's vision and mission. However, certain discrepancies emerged concerning stakeholders' acceptability levels for specific objectives. With regard to the importance-performance analysis, the results highlighted the need for the organization to enhance its performance in producing graduates possessing advanced disciplinary content knowledge. Graduates should be equipped to examine and appreciate both traditional and contemporary theories, concepts, and models within their respective disciplines.\n\nConclusion: The study concludes that stakeholders have high awareness and acceptability of the preambular provisions of the university and the MPE program, but external stakeholders have lower awareness and acceptability. The congruency between program objectives and graduate school objectives, as well as the alignment between the university vision and graduate school vision and mission, suggests a well-designed and implemented program. Meanwhile, the importance-performance analysis highlights areas to improve, such as advanced disciplinary content, effective communication, and critical thinking and research skills. Enhancing communication and engagement strategies, monitoring alignment with stakeholder needs, and reassessing the importance of certain goals can improve the program's alignment with broader institutional goals and contribute to the university's overall success.","PeriodicalId":187167,"journal":{"name":"Слобожанський науково-спортивний вісник","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Congruency of the Goals and Objectives of a Graduate Program in Physical Education: An Assessment of Stakeholders Thru Importance-Performance Analysis Framework\",\"authors\":\"Bryan M. Nozaleda, Ma. Haidee A. Mabborang\",\"doi\":\"10.15391/snsv.2023-2.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study assessed the congruency of a graduate physical education program's goals and objectives using the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) framework. The research aimed to identify strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement, ultimately enhancing curriculum and bridging the gap between academia and the physical education and sports industry.\\n\\nMaterials and Methods: a cross-sectional survey was conducted, utilizing a structured questionnaire distributed to 135 participants classified as internal and external stakeholders selected via purposive convenience sampling. The questionnaire was administered via Google Forms. The questionnaire consisted of items related to stakeholders' demographic profile, awareness, acceptability, and perceived levels of importance and performance of the goals and objectives of the program. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, IPA, and Independent Samples T-test to determine varying perceptions among stakeholders.\\n\\nResults: The findings indicated a substantial degree of awareness and acceptability of the program's goals and objectives among stakeholders. The study also revealed a strong alignment between the program objectives, graduate school objectives, and the university's vision and mission. However, certain discrepancies emerged concerning stakeholders' acceptability levels for specific objectives. With regard to the importance-performance analysis, the results highlighted the need for the organization to enhance its performance in producing graduates possessing advanced disciplinary content knowledge. Graduates should be equipped to examine and appreciate both traditional and contemporary theories, concepts, and models within their respective disciplines.\\n\\nConclusion: The study concludes that stakeholders have high awareness and acceptability of the preambular provisions of the university and the MPE program, but external stakeholders have lower awareness and acceptability. The congruency between program objectives and graduate school objectives, as well as the alignment between the university vision and graduate school vision and mission, suggests a well-designed and implemented program. Meanwhile, the importance-performance analysis highlights areas to improve, such as advanced disciplinary content, effective communication, and critical thinking and research skills. Enhancing communication and engagement strategies, monitoring alignment with stakeholder needs, and reassessing the importance of certain goals can improve the program's alignment with broader institutional goals and contribute to the university's overall success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Слобожанський науково-спортивний вісник\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Слобожанський науково-спортивний вісник\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15391/snsv.2023-2.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Слобожанський науково-спортивний вісник","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15391/snsv.2023-2.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究使用重要性-绩效分析(IPA)框架评估研究生体育教育项目目标的一致性。该研究旨在确定优势、劣势和改进的机会,最终改进课程,弥合学术界与体育教育和体育产业之间的差距。材料与方法:采用横断面调查方法,通过有目的的方便抽样,对135名被分为内部和外部利益相关者的参与者进行了结构化问卷调查。问卷是通过谷歌表格进行的。调查问卷包括与利益相关者的人口统计资料、意识、可接受性以及对项目目标和目的的重要性和绩效的感知水平相关的项目。数据分析包括描述性统计、IPA和独立样本t检验,以确定利益相关者之间的不同看法。结果:调查结果表明,利益相关者对项目的目标和目的有相当程度的认识和可接受性。该研究还揭示了项目目标、研究生院目标和大学愿景和使命之间的强烈一致性。然而,涉众对特定目标的可接受程度出现了某些差异。在重要性-绩效分析方面,结果强调了该组织在培养拥有先进学科内容知识的毕业生方面需要提高其绩效。毕业生应该具备在各自学科中检验和欣赏传统和现代理论、概念和模型的能力。结论:本研究的结论是,利益相关者对大学和MPE计划的序言条款有较高的认知度和可接受度,但外部利益相关者的认知度和可接受度较低。项目目标和研究生院目标之间的一致性,以及大学愿景和研究生院愿景和使命之间的一致性,表明了一个精心设计和实施的项目。同时,重要性-绩效分析突出了需要改进的领域,如先进的学科内容,有效的沟通,批判性思维和研究技能。加强沟通和参与策略,监测与利益相关者需求的一致性,重新评估某些目标的重要性,可以改善项目与更广泛的机构目标的一致性,并为大学的整体成功做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Congruency of the Goals and Objectives of a Graduate Program in Physical Education: An Assessment of Stakeholders Thru Importance-Performance Analysis Framework
Purpose: This study assessed the congruency of a graduate physical education program's goals and objectives using the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) framework. The research aimed to identify strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement, ultimately enhancing curriculum and bridging the gap between academia and the physical education and sports industry. Materials and Methods: a cross-sectional survey was conducted, utilizing a structured questionnaire distributed to 135 participants classified as internal and external stakeholders selected via purposive convenience sampling. The questionnaire was administered via Google Forms. The questionnaire consisted of items related to stakeholders' demographic profile, awareness, acceptability, and perceived levels of importance and performance of the goals and objectives of the program. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, IPA, and Independent Samples T-test to determine varying perceptions among stakeholders. Results: The findings indicated a substantial degree of awareness and acceptability of the program's goals and objectives among stakeholders. The study also revealed a strong alignment between the program objectives, graduate school objectives, and the university's vision and mission. However, certain discrepancies emerged concerning stakeholders' acceptability levels for specific objectives. With regard to the importance-performance analysis, the results highlighted the need for the organization to enhance its performance in producing graduates possessing advanced disciplinary content knowledge. Graduates should be equipped to examine and appreciate both traditional and contemporary theories, concepts, and models within their respective disciplines. Conclusion: The study concludes that stakeholders have high awareness and acceptability of the preambular provisions of the university and the MPE program, but external stakeholders have lower awareness and acceptability. The congruency between program objectives and graduate school objectives, as well as the alignment between the university vision and graduate school vision and mission, suggests a well-designed and implemented program. Meanwhile, the importance-performance analysis highlights areas to improve, such as advanced disciplinary content, effective communication, and critical thinking and research skills. Enhancing communication and engagement strategies, monitoring alignment with stakeholder needs, and reassessing the importance of certain goals can improve the program's alignment with broader institutional goals and contribute to the university's overall success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信