落跳高度和技术对地面反力的影响及其可能的伤害意义

R. Newton, W. Young, W. Kraemer, C. Byrne
{"title":"落跳高度和技术对地面反力的影响及其可能的伤害意义","authors":"R. Newton, W. Young, W. Kraemer, C. Byrne","doi":"10.1080/15438620109512099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to quantify peak vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) and loading rate during performance of a drop jump when (a) attempting to jump for maximum height (DJ‐H) and (b) attempting to jump for maximum height and minimum ground contact time (DJ‐H/t), both common training techniques for athletes in a variety of sports. Peak VGRF's were between 7.59 and 9.37 times bodyweight for the DJ‐H/t technique, which was approximately twice the magnitude of the DJ‐H technique. The maximum rate of loading was also greater for DJ‐H/t. In an earlier related study it was observed that 3 subjects who trained with the DJ‐H/t method experienced lower limb pain, which prevented them from further training. These dropouts were compared to non‐dropouts on factors related to their pre‐training level of leg strength and training drop height. An index of drop height divided by leg strength was found to be significantly greater (p<0.05) for the dropouts. It was concluded that training to improve the DJ‐H/t technique imposes a relatively high stress on the leg musculo‐skeletal system. Alternatively, using a relatively high drop height in conjunction with a low pre‐training leg strength level also increases the risk of injury. Requiring an athlete to qualify for drop jump training by exceeding a standard passing score on the drop jump/leg strength index might enable strength and conditioning coaches to limit the injury risk during such plyometric training.","PeriodicalId":403174,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of drop jump height and technique on ground reaction force with possible implication for injury\",\"authors\":\"R. Newton, W. Young, W. Kraemer, C. Byrne\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15438620109512099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to quantify peak vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) and loading rate during performance of a drop jump when (a) attempting to jump for maximum height (DJ‐H) and (b) attempting to jump for maximum height and minimum ground contact time (DJ‐H/t), both common training techniques for athletes in a variety of sports. Peak VGRF's were between 7.59 and 9.37 times bodyweight for the DJ‐H/t technique, which was approximately twice the magnitude of the DJ‐H technique. The maximum rate of loading was also greater for DJ‐H/t. In an earlier related study it was observed that 3 subjects who trained with the DJ‐H/t method experienced lower limb pain, which prevented them from further training. These dropouts were compared to non‐dropouts on factors related to their pre‐training level of leg strength and training drop height. An index of drop height divided by leg strength was found to be significantly greater (p<0.05) for the dropouts. It was concluded that training to improve the DJ‐H/t technique imposes a relatively high stress on the leg musculo‐skeletal system. Alternatively, using a relatively high drop height in conjunction with a low pre‐training leg strength level also increases the risk of injury. Requiring an athlete to qualify for drop jump training by exceeding a standard passing score on the drop jump/leg strength index might enable strength and conditioning coaches to limit the injury risk during such plyometric training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15438620109512099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15438620109512099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

本研究的目的是量化(a)尝试以最大高度(DJ‐H)和(b)尝试以最大高度和最小地面接触时间(DJ‐H/t)进行落体跳时的峰值垂直地面反力(VGRF)和加载率,这两种训练技术都是各种运动中运动员常用的训练技术。DJ‐H/t技术的VGRF峰值为体重的7.59 ~ 9.37倍,约为DJ‐H技术的两倍。DJ‐H/t的最大加载速率也更大。在早期的一项相关研究中,观察到3名使用DJ - H/t方法训练的受试者出现下肢疼痛,这使他们无法进行进一步的训练。将这些辍学者与未辍学者在训练前腿部力量水平和训练落差高度相关因素上进行比较。落体高度除以腿部力量的指数显著高于落体高度(p<0.05)。结论是,提高DJ - H/t技术的训练对腿部肌肉-骨骼系统施加了相对较高的压力。另外,使用相对较高的落点高度,同时训练前腿部力量水平较低,也会增加受伤的风险。要求运动员在跳远/腿部力量指数上超过标准及格分数才有资格进行跳远训练,这可能会使力量和体能教练在这种增强式训练中限制受伤的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of drop jump height and technique on ground reaction force with possible implication for injury
The purpose of this study was to quantify peak vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) and loading rate during performance of a drop jump when (a) attempting to jump for maximum height (DJ‐H) and (b) attempting to jump for maximum height and minimum ground contact time (DJ‐H/t), both common training techniques for athletes in a variety of sports. Peak VGRF's were between 7.59 and 9.37 times bodyweight for the DJ‐H/t technique, which was approximately twice the magnitude of the DJ‐H technique. The maximum rate of loading was also greater for DJ‐H/t. In an earlier related study it was observed that 3 subjects who trained with the DJ‐H/t method experienced lower limb pain, which prevented them from further training. These dropouts were compared to non‐dropouts on factors related to their pre‐training level of leg strength and training drop height. An index of drop height divided by leg strength was found to be significantly greater (p<0.05) for the dropouts. It was concluded that training to improve the DJ‐H/t technique imposes a relatively high stress on the leg musculo‐skeletal system. Alternatively, using a relatively high drop height in conjunction with a low pre‐training leg strength level also increases the risk of injury. Requiring an athlete to qualify for drop jump training by exceeding a standard passing score on the drop jump/leg strength index might enable strength and conditioning coaches to limit the injury risk during such plyometric training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信