面向地面应用的GNSS观测加权新策略

Nourdine Ait Tmazirte, Syed Ali Kazim, J. Marais
{"title":"面向地面应用的GNSS观测加权新策略","authors":"Nourdine Ait Tmazirte, Syed Ali Kazim, J. Marais","doi":"10.23919/ENC48637.2020.9317393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"GNSS observations weighting models have received attention in the past decades. Several reasons can explain this gain in consideration. It mainly corresponds to the emergence of autonomous, global, continuous, precise and integrity-compliant localization systems. Indeed, for safety critical applications, adopting a naive strategy of observations' equal weighting could not guarantee to achieve all goals, and even more for terrestrial applications where the local environment can strongly disturb signals reception. The existing observation models use one or two metrics to estimate the confidence to be given to an observation. The first is the satellites' elevations. This model considers that the satellites with low elevation are more subjected to global errors (orbit and atmosphere errors) or local multipath or NLOS phenomena. The second criterion is the carrier to noise ratio provided by the receiver. However, combining these two criteria by a simple multiplication of the two models taken separately presents a limit: the result is no more ‘under control’. In this study, we propose to formulate a new weighting strategy using these two criteria more guided by expertise's expected results.","PeriodicalId":157951,"journal":{"name":"2020 European Navigation Conference (ENC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a new GNSS observation weighting strategy for terrestrial applications\",\"authors\":\"Nourdine Ait Tmazirte, Syed Ali Kazim, J. Marais\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/ENC48637.2020.9317393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"GNSS observations weighting models have received attention in the past decades. Several reasons can explain this gain in consideration. It mainly corresponds to the emergence of autonomous, global, continuous, precise and integrity-compliant localization systems. Indeed, for safety critical applications, adopting a naive strategy of observations' equal weighting could not guarantee to achieve all goals, and even more for terrestrial applications where the local environment can strongly disturb signals reception. The existing observation models use one or two metrics to estimate the confidence to be given to an observation. The first is the satellites' elevations. This model considers that the satellites with low elevation are more subjected to global errors (orbit and atmosphere errors) or local multipath or NLOS phenomena. The second criterion is the carrier to noise ratio provided by the receiver. However, combining these two criteria by a simple multiplication of the two models taken separately presents a limit: the result is no more ‘under control’. In this study, we propose to formulate a new weighting strategy using these two criteria more guided by expertise's expected results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":157951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 European Navigation Conference (ENC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 European Navigation Conference (ENC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/ENC48637.2020.9317393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 European Navigation Conference (ENC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ENC48637.2020.9317393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

GNSS观测加权模型在过去几十年中受到了广泛关注。有几个原因可以解释这种增长。它主要对应于自主定位系统、全局定位系统、连续定位系统、精确定位系统和符合完整性定位系统的出现。事实上,对于安全关键应用,采用观测等权重的天真策略并不能保证实现所有目标,对于当地环境可能强烈干扰信号接收的地面应用更是如此。现有的观测模型使用一个或两个度量来估计观测值的置信度。首先是卫星的高度。该模型考虑了低海拔卫星更容易受到全局误差(轨道和大气误差)或局部多径或NLOS现象的影响。第二个准则是由接收机提供的载波噪声比。然而,将这两个标准通过两个模型的简单相乘结合起来,就会出现一个限制:结果不再是“可控的”。在本研究中,我们建议使用这两个标准制定新的权重策略,更多地以专家的预期结果为指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a new GNSS observation weighting strategy for terrestrial applications
GNSS observations weighting models have received attention in the past decades. Several reasons can explain this gain in consideration. It mainly corresponds to the emergence of autonomous, global, continuous, precise and integrity-compliant localization systems. Indeed, for safety critical applications, adopting a naive strategy of observations' equal weighting could not guarantee to achieve all goals, and even more for terrestrial applications where the local environment can strongly disturb signals reception. The existing observation models use one or two metrics to estimate the confidence to be given to an observation. The first is the satellites' elevations. This model considers that the satellites with low elevation are more subjected to global errors (orbit and atmosphere errors) or local multipath or NLOS phenomena. The second criterion is the carrier to noise ratio provided by the receiver. However, combining these two criteria by a simple multiplication of the two models taken separately presents a limit: the result is no more ‘under control’. In this study, we propose to formulate a new weighting strategy using these two criteria more guided by expertise's expected results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信