定义管理缺陷的决策因素:技术债务的视角

W. Snipes, Brian P. Robinson, Yuepu Guo, C. Seaman
{"title":"定义管理缺陷的决策因素:技术债务的视角","authors":"W. Snipes, Brian P. Robinson, Yuepu Guo, C. Seaman","doi":"10.1109/MTD.2012.6226001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Making a decision about whether to fix or defer fixing a defect is important to software projects. Deferring defects accumulates a technical debt that burdens the software team and customer with a less than optimal solution. The decision to defer fixing a defect is made by Software Change Control Boards (CCBs) based on a set of decision factors. In this paper, we evaluated the set of decision factors used by two CCBs at ABB in the context of technical debt management The aim was to determine how a model of cost and benefits of incurring technical debt could be part of the CCB decision process. We identified the cost categories and decision factors for fixing and deferring defects as a result of interviews with CCB members. We found that the decision factors could incorporate the financial aspects when using the technical debt metaphor. We identify opportunities for further research to integrate technical debt concepts with the decision factors towards better long term outcomes.","PeriodicalId":156499,"journal":{"name":"2012 Third International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD)","volume":"191 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining the decision factors for managing defects: A technical debt perspective\",\"authors\":\"W. Snipes, Brian P. Robinson, Yuepu Guo, C. Seaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MTD.2012.6226001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Making a decision about whether to fix or defer fixing a defect is important to software projects. Deferring defects accumulates a technical debt that burdens the software team and customer with a less than optimal solution. The decision to defer fixing a defect is made by Software Change Control Boards (CCBs) based on a set of decision factors. In this paper, we evaluated the set of decision factors used by two CCBs at ABB in the context of technical debt management The aim was to determine how a model of cost and benefits of incurring technical debt could be part of the CCB decision process. We identified the cost categories and decision factors for fixing and deferring defects as a result of interviews with CCB members. We found that the decision factors could incorporate the financial aspects when using the technical debt metaphor. We identify opportunities for further research to integrate technical debt concepts with the decision factors towards better long term outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Third International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD)\",\"volume\":\"191 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Third International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MTD.2012.6226001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Third International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MTD.2012.6226001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

摘要

对于软件项目来说,决定是修复还是推迟修复缺陷是很重要的。延迟缺陷会累积技术债务,给软件团队和客户带来不太理想的解决方案。推迟修复缺陷的决定是由软件变更控制委员会(ccb)基于一组决策因素做出的。在本文中,我们评估了ABB的两个建设银行在技术债务管理背景下使用的决策因素集,目的是确定产生技术债务的成本和收益模型如何成为建设银行决策过程的一部分。作为与CCB成员面谈的结果,我们确定了修复和延迟缺陷的成本类别和决策因素。我们发现,当使用技术债务比喻时,决策因素可以包含财务方面。我们确定了进一步研究的机会,将技术债务概念与决策因素结合起来,以实现更好的长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining the decision factors for managing defects: A technical debt perspective
Making a decision about whether to fix or defer fixing a defect is important to software projects. Deferring defects accumulates a technical debt that burdens the software team and customer with a less than optimal solution. The decision to defer fixing a defect is made by Software Change Control Boards (CCBs) based on a set of decision factors. In this paper, we evaluated the set of decision factors used by two CCBs at ABB in the context of technical debt management The aim was to determine how a model of cost and benefits of incurring technical debt could be part of the CCB decision process. We identified the cost categories and decision factors for fixing and deferring defects as a result of interviews with CCB members. We found that the decision factors could incorporate the financial aspects when using the technical debt metaphor. We identify opportunities for further research to integrate technical debt concepts with the decision factors towards better long term outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信