{"title":"用STAAD和ETABS软件设计某结构的设计结果比较","authors":"A. Herbert","doi":"10.6088/IJCSER.00202030014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STAADPro and ETABS are the present day leading design softwares in the market. Many design companies use these softwares for their project design purposes. So, this project mainly deals with the comparative analysis of the results obtained from the design of a regular and a plan irregular (as per IS 1893) multi storey building structure when designed using STAADPro and ETABS softwares separately. These results will also be compared with manual calculations of a sample beam and column of the same structure designed as per IS 456.","PeriodicalId":162063,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of design results of a Structure designed using STAAD and ETABS Software\",\"authors\":\"A. Herbert\",\"doi\":\"10.6088/IJCSER.00202030014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STAADPro and ETABS are the present day leading design softwares in the market. Many design companies use these softwares for their project design purposes. So, this project mainly deals with the comparative analysis of the results obtained from the design of a regular and a plan irregular (as per IS 1893) multi storey building structure when designed using STAADPro and ETABS softwares separately. These results will also be compared with manual calculations of a sample beam and column of the same structure designed as per IS 456.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6088/IJCSER.00202030014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6088/IJCSER.00202030014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of design results of a Structure designed using STAAD and ETABS Software
STAADPro and ETABS are the present day leading design softwares in the market. Many design companies use these softwares for their project design purposes. So, this project mainly deals with the comparative analysis of the results obtained from the design of a regular and a plan irregular (as per IS 1893) multi storey building structure when designed using STAADPro and ETABS softwares separately. These results will also be compared with manual calculations of a sample beam and column of the same structure designed as per IS 456.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
