自由水面线性化对靠近自由水面航行的水下航行器预测水动力响应的影响

W. Lambert, S. Brizzolara, C. Woolsey
{"title":"自由水面线性化对靠近自由水面航行的水下航行器预测水动力响应的影响","authors":"W. Lambert, S. Brizzolara, C. Woolsey","doi":"10.1115/omae2022-80485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study presents a comparison of the hydrodynamic responses generated by a boundary element method with linear free-surface boundary conditions and a volume of fluid RANSE CFD method with nonlinear surface capturing for a shallowly submerged prolate spheroid travelling with constant forward velocity. Observing the effects of free-surface proximity and forward velocity on the hydrodynamic forces and wave disturbance between the two numerical methods reveals the influence and importance of considering a nonlinear free-surface. The forces and moments acting on the spheroid using the nonlinear method are generally larger than the linear method showing that nonlinear effects are important in the calculation of wave making resistance. The difference between the linear and nonlinear methods grows as submergence decreases or wave making increases. An additional phenomenon is shown where the difference between the methods displays a trend with respect to Froude number and depth that is similar to the values being compared. The physical response of these nonlinear effects is seen in the steepening of surface waves near the body, which breaks some of the assumptions made in the linear boundary element method.","PeriodicalId":408227,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5A: Ocean Engineering","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Effect of Free-Surface Linearization on the Predicted Hydrodynamic Response of Underwater Vehicles Travelling Near the Free-Surface\",\"authors\":\"W. Lambert, S. Brizzolara, C. Woolsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/omae2022-80485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study presents a comparison of the hydrodynamic responses generated by a boundary element method with linear free-surface boundary conditions and a volume of fluid RANSE CFD method with nonlinear surface capturing for a shallowly submerged prolate spheroid travelling with constant forward velocity. Observing the effects of free-surface proximity and forward velocity on the hydrodynamic forces and wave disturbance between the two numerical methods reveals the influence and importance of considering a nonlinear free-surface. The forces and moments acting on the spheroid using the nonlinear method are generally larger than the linear method showing that nonlinear effects are important in the calculation of wave making resistance. The difference between the linear and nonlinear methods grows as submergence decreases or wave making increases. An additional phenomenon is shown where the difference between the methods displays a trend with respect to Froude number and depth that is similar to the values being compared. The physical response of these nonlinear effects is seen in the steepening of surface waves near the body, which breaks some of the assumptions made in the linear boundary element method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 5A: Ocean Engineering\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 5A: Ocean Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2022-80485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5A: Ocean Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2022-80485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文比较了具有线性自由面边界条件的边界元法和具有非线性表面捕获的流体体积RANSE CFD法对浅淹没等速向前运动的长形球体的水动力响应。观察两种数值方法中自由表面接近度和前进速度对水动力和波浪扰动的影响,揭示了考虑非线性自由表面的影响和重要性。用非线性方法计算作用在球面上的力和力矩通常大于线性方法,说明非线性效应在造波阻力计算中很重要。线性和非线性方法之间的差异随着淹没度的减小或造波量的增加而增大。还显示了另一种现象,即方法之间的差异显示了关于弗劳德数和深度的趋势,这与正在比较的值相似。这些非线性效应的物理响应可以在物体附近的表面波变陡中看到,这打破了线性边界元法中所作的一些假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Effect of Free-Surface Linearization on the Predicted Hydrodynamic Response of Underwater Vehicles Travelling Near the Free-Surface
This study presents a comparison of the hydrodynamic responses generated by a boundary element method with linear free-surface boundary conditions and a volume of fluid RANSE CFD method with nonlinear surface capturing for a shallowly submerged prolate spheroid travelling with constant forward velocity. Observing the effects of free-surface proximity and forward velocity on the hydrodynamic forces and wave disturbance between the two numerical methods reveals the influence and importance of considering a nonlinear free-surface. The forces and moments acting on the spheroid using the nonlinear method are generally larger than the linear method showing that nonlinear effects are important in the calculation of wave making resistance. The difference between the linear and nonlinear methods grows as submergence decreases or wave making increases. An additional phenomenon is shown where the difference between the methods displays a trend with respect to Froude number and depth that is similar to the values being compared. The physical response of these nonlinear effects is seen in the steepening of surface waves near the body, which breaks some of the assumptions made in the linear boundary element method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信