{"title":"简介:什么是多级治理?","authors":"A. Benz","doi":"10.4337/9781789908374.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decades, the concept of multilevel governance (MLG) has stimulated fascinating research on the changing nature of political authority. Scholars have discovered the complexity, variety and dynamics of governance in multilevel settings within and beyond nation states, probed the merits of different explanations of these changes and, eventually, studied the consequences for politics, policymaking and democratic legitimacy. Thanks to this research, we have a good understanding of the underlying theoretical foundations of MLG, its historical evolution, its varieties and political dimensions. Yet the advancement of scientific research has come at a price. On the one hand, highly sophisticated and empirically rich research has revealed various patterns of MLG and many intricate details regarding their evolution, operation and consequences (Bache and Flinders 2015; Enderlein, Wälti and Zürn 2010; Piattoni 2010). On the other hand, the concept has lost its analytical clarity and tends to become a catch-all category (Stephenson 2013: 817–818). There is obviously need for a conceptual framework that does not conceal but explicates different aspects covered by the term. Such a framework is essential to guide comparative research that reflects varieties of MLG and contributes to advance theoretical reasoning on the causes, operation and consequences for politics and policymaking.","PeriodicalId":332930,"journal":{"name":"A Research Agenda for Multilevel Governance","volume":"544 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: What is multilevel governance?\",\"authors\":\"A. Benz\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781789908374.00006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the last decades, the concept of multilevel governance (MLG) has stimulated fascinating research on the changing nature of political authority. Scholars have discovered the complexity, variety and dynamics of governance in multilevel settings within and beyond nation states, probed the merits of different explanations of these changes and, eventually, studied the consequences for politics, policymaking and democratic legitimacy. Thanks to this research, we have a good understanding of the underlying theoretical foundations of MLG, its historical evolution, its varieties and political dimensions. Yet the advancement of scientific research has come at a price. On the one hand, highly sophisticated and empirically rich research has revealed various patterns of MLG and many intricate details regarding their evolution, operation and consequences (Bache and Flinders 2015; Enderlein, Wälti and Zürn 2010; Piattoni 2010). On the other hand, the concept has lost its analytical clarity and tends to become a catch-all category (Stephenson 2013: 817–818). There is obviously need for a conceptual framework that does not conceal but explicates different aspects covered by the term. Such a framework is essential to guide comparative research that reflects varieties of MLG and contributes to advance theoretical reasoning on the causes, operation and consequences for politics and policymaking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Research Agenda for Multilevel Governance\",\"volume\":\"544 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Research Agenda for Multilevel Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789908374.00006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Research Agenda for Multilevel Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789908374.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
在过去的几十年里,多层次治理(MLG)的概念激发了对政治权威不断变化的本质的有趣研究。学者们发现了在民族国家内外的多层次环境中治理的复杂性、多样性和动态性,探讨了对这些变化的不同解释的优点,并最终研究了政治、决策和民主合法性的后果。通过本研究,我们对MLG的基本理论基础、历史演变、多样性和政治维度有了较好的了解。然而,科学研究的进步是有代价的。一方面,高度复杂和经验丰富的研究揭示了MLG的各种模式以及关于其演变,运作和后果的许多复杂细节(Bache and Flinders 2015;Enderlein, Wälti and z, 2010;Piattoni 2010)。另一方面,这个概念已经失去了分析的清晰度,并倾向于成为一个笼统的类别(Stephenson 2013: 817-818)。显然需要一个概念框架,它不掩盖而是阐明这个术语所涵盖的不同方面。这一框架对于指导反映各种各样的劳动生产率的比较研究至关重要,并有助于推进对政治和政策制定的原因、运作和后果的理论推理。
Over the last decades, the concept of multilevel governance (MLG) has stimulated fascinating research on the changing nature of political authority. Scholars have discovered the complexity, variety and dynamics of governance in multilevel settings within and beyond nation states, probed the merits of different explanations of these changes and, eventually, studied the consequences for politics, policymaking and democratic legitimacy. Thanks to this research, we have a good understanding of the underlying theoretical foundations of MLG, its historical evolution, its varieties and political dimensions. Yet the advancement of scientific research has come at a price. On the one hand, highly sophisticated and empirically rich research has revealed various patterns of MLG and many intricate details regarding their evolution, operation and consequences (Bache and Flinders 2015; Enderlein, Wälti and Zürn 2010; Piattoni 2010). On the other hand, the concept has lost its analytical clarity and tends to become a catch-all category (Stephenson 2013: 817–818). There is obviously need for a conceptual framework that does not conceal but explicates different aspects covered by the term. Such a framework is essential to guide comparative research that reflects varieties of MLG and contributes to advance theoretical reasoning on the causes, operation and consequences for politics and policymaking.