将质量成本的定义扩展到符合和不符合的二分法之外

A. Elizondo-Noriega, M. Beruvides, David Güemes-Castorena
{"title":"将质量成本的定义扩展到符合和不符合的二分法之外","authors":"A. Elizondo-Noriega, M. Beruvides, David Güemes-Castorena","doi":"10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Satisfying customer's needs is the main goal in both quality and innovation management. However, the relationship between innovation management and quality management is not fully understood in the quality literature. One way to understand this complex relationship is via cost of quality (COQ) studies. COQ is the sum of conformance and nonconformance costs, but the conformance-nonconformance dichotomy seems to be ambiguous and arbitrarily defined. The ambiguity in the conformance and nonconformance terminology prevents observing the relationship between innovation and quality management. In the current work that ambiguity is demonstrated via the analysis of a paradox between properly managing and reducing product returns in consumer electronics. Also, the inhibition mechanism preventing the ability to observe the abovementioned relationship is made visible. It is critical and necessary to redefine the COQ not only on conformance and nonconformance terms, but also on a holistically and consistent basis to aid in quality policy making process.","PeriodicalId":438177,"journal":{"name":"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expanding the Definition of Quality Costs Beyond the Conformance and Nonconformance Dichotomy\",\"authors\":\"A. Elizondo-Noriega, M. Beruvides, David Güemes-Castorena\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Satisfying customer's needs is the main goal in both quality and innovation management. However, the relationship between innovation management and quality management is not fully understood in the quality literature. One way to understand this complex relationship is via cost of quality (COQ) studies. COQ is the sum of conformance and nonconformance costs, but the conformance-nonconformance dichotomy seems to be ambiguous and arbitrarily defined. The ambiguity in the conformance and nonconformance terminology prevents observing the relationship between innovation and quality management. In the current work that ambiguity is demonstrated via the analysis of a paradox between properly managing and reducing product returns in consumer electronics. Also, the inhibition mechanism preventing the ability to observe the abovementioned relationship is made visible. It is critical and necessary to redefine the COQ not only on conformance and nonconformance terms, but also on a holistically and consistent basis to aid in quality policy making process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

满足顾客需求是质量管理和创新管理的主要目标。然而,在质量文献中,创新管理与质量管理之间的关系并没有得到充分的理解。理解这种复杂关系的一种方法是通过质量成本(COQ)研究。COQ是符合和不符合成本的总和,但是符合和不符合的二分法似乎是模糊的和任意定义的。符合性和不符合性术语的模糊性阻碍了对创新和质量管理之间关系的观察。在目前的工作中,通过对消费电子产品中适当管理和减少产品退货之间的悖论的分析,证明了这种模糊性。此外,抑制机制阻止观察上述关系的能力是可见的。重新定义COQ不仅是在符合和不符合方面,而且是在整体和一致的基础上,以帮助质量政策制定过程,这是至关重要和必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expanding the Definition of Quality Costs Beyond the Conformance and Nonconformance Dichotomy
Satisfying customer's needs is the main goal in both quality and innovation management. However, the relationship between innovation management and quality management is not fully understood in the quality literature. One way to understand this complex relationship is via cost of quality (COQ) studies. COQ is the sum of conformance and nonconformance costs, but the conformance-nonconformance dichotomy seems to be ambiguous and arbitrarily defined. The ambiguity in the conformance and nonconformance terminology prevents observing the relationship between innovation and quality management. In the current work that ambiguity is demonstrated via the analysis of a paradox between properly managing and reducing product returns in consumer electronics. Also, the inhibition mechanism preventing the ability to observe the abovementioned relationship is made visible. It is critical and necessary to redefine the COQ not only on conformance and nonconformance terms, but also on a holistically and consistent basis to aid in quality policy making process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信