A. Mozaffari, A. Klotzsche, G. He, H. Vereecken, J. van der Kruk, C. Warren, A. Giannopoulos
{"title":"井间探地雷达三维全波形反演研究","authors":"A. Mozaffari, A. Klotzsche, G. He, H. Vereecken, J. van der Kruk, C. Warren, A. Giannopoulos","doi":"10.1109/ICGPR.2016.7572687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2D crosshole ground penetrating (GPR) full-1 waveform inversion (FWI) has shown superior resolution 1 compared to ray-based inversion tomograms for synthetic and experimental data. To invert measured 3D data with a 2D j model that has a reduced geometrical spreading and assumes infinite source and receiver dimensions perpendicular to the 2D inversion plane, the Bleistein transformation can be used to convert the measured 3D data to 2D. This far-field conversion consists of a phase shift and amplitude correction that is based on the first arrival travel time of each trace. In the case of late arrival and high amplitude events that 1 can occur due to low-velocity waveguides andfast propagating refracted waves, this transformation can introduce errors especially in the amplitude such that the inverted conductivity is less accurate. To overcome these problems, we have replaced the 2D finite difference time domain FDTD forward model in the FWI scheme with the well-known gprMax3D FDTD modeling program. In this way, we do not need to use the Bleistein 3D-to-2D filter with its far-field approximation, and we can deal with the correct geometrical spreading and approximate better realistic point source and receivers. Currently, the 2D FWI algorithm has been extended to 2.5D by replacing the 2D FDTD with the gprMax 3D FDTD modeling program. The first test of the 2.5D FWI is based on inversion results of a data set acquired at the Widen site in Switzerland that contained a low-velocity waveguide. The new 2.5D FWI performed well in reconstructing the models. The new 2.5D FWI enables a more reliable re-construction of the subsurface image, especially the electrical conductivity tomograms and to the full use of all the modeling possibilities of the gprMax modeling tool.","PeriodicalId":187048,"journal":{"name":"2016 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards 3D full-waveform inversion of crosshole GPR data\",\"authors\":\"A. Mozaffari, A. Klotzsche, G. He, H. Vereecken, J. van der Kruk, C. Warren, A. Giannopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICGPR.2016.7572687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2D crosshole ground penetrating (GPR) full-1 waveform inversion (FWI) has shown superior resolution 1 compared to ray-based inversion tomograms for synthetic and experimental data. To invert measured 3D data with a 2D j model that has a reduced geometrical spreading and assumes infinite source and receiver dimensions perpendicular to the 2D inversion plane, the Bleistein transformation can be used to convert the measured 3D data to 2D. This far-field conversion consists of a phase shift and amplitude correction that is based on the first arrival travel time of each trace. In the case of late arrival and high amplitude events that 1 can occur due to low-velocity waveguides andfast propagating refracted waves, this transformation can introduce errors especially in the amplitude such that the inverted conductivity is less accurate. To overcome these problems, we have replaced the 2D finite difference time domain FDTD forward model in the FWI scheme with the well-known gprMax3D FDTD modeling program. In this way, we do not need to use the Bleistein 3D-to-2D filter with its far-field approximation, and we can deal with the correct geometrical spreading and approximate better realistic point source and receivers. Currently, the 2D FWI algorithm has been extended to 2.5D by replacing the 2D FDTD with the gprMax 3D FDTD modeling program. The first test of the 2.5D FWI is based on inversion results of a data set acquired at the Widen site in Switzerland that contained a low-velocity waveguide. The new 2.5D FWI performed well in reconstructing the models. The new 2.5D FWI enables a more reliable re-construction of the subsurface image, especially the electrical conductivity tomograms and to the full use of all the modeling possibilities of the gprMax modeling tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2016.7572687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2016.7572687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
对于合成数据和实验数据,与基于射线的反演层析成像相比,2D井间探地雷达(GPR)全波形反演(FWI)显示出更高的分辨率。为了利用二维j模型反演实测的三维数据,该模型具有减小的几何扩展,并且假设源和接收器尺寸无限,垂直于二维反演平面,可以使用Bleistein变换将实测的三维数据转换为二维数据。这种远场转换包括基于每个迹线的首次到达旅行时间的相移和幅度校正。在由于低速波导和快速传播的折射波而可能发生的延迟到达和高振幅事件1的情况下,这种转换可能会引入误差,特别是在振幅方面,从而使反向电导率不太准确。为了克服这些问题,我们用著名的gprMax3D FDTD建模程序取代了FWI方案中的二维有限差分时域FDTD正演模型。这样,我们就不需要使用具有远场近似的Bleistein 3D-to-2D滤波器,我们可以处理正确的几何扩展并近似更好的现实点源和接收机。目前,用gprMax 3D FDTD建模程序代替2D FDTD,将2D FWI算法扩展到2.5D。2.5D FWI的第一次测试是基于在瑞士拓宽站点获得的数据集的反演结果,该数据集包含一个低速波导。新的2.5D FWI在重建模型方面表现良好。新的2.5D FWI能够更可靠地重建地下图像,特别是电导率层析图,并充分利用gprMax建模工具的所有建模可能性。
Towards 3D full-waveform inversion of crosshole GPR data
2D crosshole ground penetrating (GPR) full-1 waveform inversion (FWI) has shown superior resolution 1 compared to ray-based inversion tomograms for synthetic and experimental data. To invert measured 3D data with a 2D j model that has a reduced geometrical spreading and assumes infinite source and receiver dimensions perpendicular to the 2D inversion plane, the Bleistein transformation can be used to convert the measured 3D data to 2D. This far-field conversion consists of a phase shift and amplitude correction that is based on the first arrival travel time of each trace. In the case of late arrival and high amplitude events that 1 can occur due to low-velocity waveguides andfast propagating refracted waves, this transformation can introduce errors especially in the amplitude such that the inverted conductivity is less accurate. To overcome these problems, we have replaced the 2D finite difference time domain FDTD forward model in the FWI scheme with the well-known gprMax3D FDTD modeling program. In this way, we do not need to use the Bleistein 3D-to-2D filter with its far-field approximation, and we can deal with the correct geometrical spreading and approximate better realistic point source and receivers. Currently, the 2D FWI algorithm has been extended to 2.5D by replacing the 2D FDTD with the gprMax 3D FDTD modeling program. The first test of the 2.5D FWI is based on inversion results of a data set acquired at the Widen site in Switzerland that contained a low-velocity waveguide. The new 2.5D FWI performed well in reconstructing the models. The new 2.5D FWI enables a more reliable re-construction of the subsurface image, especially the electrical conductivity tomograms and to the full use of all the modeling possibilities of the gprMax modeling tool.