并行gram-schmidt算法的不同划分方案分析

S. Oliveira, L. Borges, M. Holzrichter, T. Soma
{"title":"并行gram-schmidt算法的不同划分方案分析","authors":"S. Oliveira, L. Borges, M. Holzrichter, T. Soma","doi":"10.1080/10637199808947392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we analyze implementations of parallel Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization algorithms. One of the first parallel orthogonalization of Gram-Schmidt was the row-wise partitioning of O'Leary and Whitman. In this paper we describe a pipelined implementation which uses column-wise partitioning schemes. Timing models for the column-wise parallel algorithms are derived. We compare our column-wise partitionings against the row-wise partitioning and validate our study with computational results. The pipelined orthogonalization algorithm is important because the timing analysis is independent of the architecture model. Threshold values of m max, which is the number of rows where row partitioning becomes better than column partitioning are found theoretically and verified with our experiments","PeriodicalId":406098,"journal":{"name":"Parallel Algorithms and Applications","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT PARTITIONING SCHEMES FOR PARALLEL GRAM-SCHMIDT ALGORITHMS\",\"authors\":\"S. Oliveira, L. Borges, M. Holzrichter, T. Soma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10637199808947392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we analyze implementations of parallel Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization algorithms. One of the first parallel orthogonalization of Gram-Schmidt was the row-wise partitioning of O'Leary and Whitman. In this paper we describe a pipelined implementation which uses column-wise partitioning schemes. Timing models for the column-wise parallel algorithms are derived. We compare our column-wise partitionings against the row-wise partitioning and validate our study with computational results. The pipelined orthogonalization algorithm is important because the timing analysis is independent of the architecture model. Threshold values of m max, which is the number of rows where row partitioning becomes better than column partitioning are found theoretically and verified with our experiments\",\"PeriodicalId\":406098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parallel Algorithms and Applications\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parallel Algorithms and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10637199808947392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parallel Algorithms and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10637199808947392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文分析了并行Gram-Schmidt正交化算法的实现。Gram-Schmidt的第一个平行正交化是O'Leary和Whitman的逐行划分。在本文中,我们描述了一个使用列分区方案的流水线实现。推导了列并行算法的时序模型。我们比较了列分区和行分区,并用计算结果验证了我们的研究。流水线正交化算法非常重要,因为时序分析与体系结构模型无关。从理论上找到了mmax的阈值,即行分区优于列分区的行数,并通过我们的实验进行了验证
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT PARTITIONING SCHEMES FOR PARALLEL GRAM-SCHMIDT ALGORITHMS
In this paper we analyze implementations of parallel Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization algorithms. One of the first parallel orthogonalization of Gram-Schmidt was the row-wise partitioning of O'Leary and Whitman. In this paper we describe a pipelined implementation which uses column-wise partitioning schemes. Timing models for the column-wise parallel algorithms are derived. We compare our column-wise partitionings against the row-wise partitioning and validate our study with computational results. The pipelined orthogonalization algorithm is important because the timing analysis is independent of the architecture model. Threshold values of m max, which is the number of rows where row partitioning becomes better than column partitioning are found theoretically and verified with our experiments
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信