甲状腺激素评估与c反应蛋白比较对脓毒症患者的预测价值

IF 0.3 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Mohamed Hosny, Rania Rashad, Doaa Atef, Nashwa Abed
{"title":"甲状腺激素评估与c反应蛋白比较对脓毒症患者的预测价值","authors":"Mohamed Hosny,&nbsp;Rania Rashad,&nbsp;Doaa Atef,&nbsp;Nashwa Abed","doi":"10.1016/j.ejccm.2015.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Thyroid dysfunction is associated with mortality in critically ill patients. We investigated the predictive value of the thyroid hormone compared to CRP in septic patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>80 patients were included in a prospective, randomized study done in the critical care department.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>FT3, FT4, and TSH levels on the fifth day were below the normal range in 61.3%, 31.2%, and 23.8% patients respectively. There was a significant decrease in the FT3 level on admission compared to the fifth day (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). By comparison of thyroid hormone levels in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock; we found the mean level of FT3 was lower in patients with septic shock (1.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.4<!--> <!-->pg/ml) and severe sepsis (1.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.2<!--> <!-->pg/ml) as compared to patients with sepsis (2.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.2<!--> <!-->pg/ml). The mean FT3 level increased in survivors (2.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.03<!--> <!-->pg/ml) compared to non survivors (1.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.89<!--> <!-->pg/ml) (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). Correlation of FT3 on the 5th day to CRP (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.332, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.039), FT3 on 5th day to IL-6 (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.339, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.035) in non survivors. Correlation of FT3 on the 5th day to APACHE II (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.359, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.025) and SOFA score (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.427, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.007). ROC curves indicated that FT3 on the 5th day had the greatest power for predicting ICU mortality (sensitivity 87.2% and specificity 73.2%). CRP (sensitivity 100% and specificity 92.7%) is a better tool than IL-6 (sensitivity 92.3% and specificity 80.5%) in predicting mortality in sepsis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>FT3 levels were negatively correlated to CRP and IL-6 levels as well as APACHE II, SOFA scores. FT3 may be used as a marker of disease severity and a predictor of mortality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":31233,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 55-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejccm.2015.11.001","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive value of thyroid hormone assessment in septic patients in comparison with C-reactive protein\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Hosny,&nbsp;Rania Rashad,&nbsp;Doaa Atef,&nbsp;Nashwa Abed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejccm.2015.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Thyroid dysfunction is associated with mortality in critically ill patients. We investigated the predictive value of the thyroid hormone compared to CRP in septic patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>80 patients were included in a prospective, randomized study done in the critical care department.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>FT3, FT4, and TSH levels on the fifth day were below the normal range in 61.3%, 31.2%, and 23.8% patients respectively. There was a significant decrease in the FT3 level on admission compared to the fifth day (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). By comparison of thyroid hormone levels in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock; we found the mean level of FT3 was lower in patients with septic shock (1.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.4<!--> <!-->pg/ml) and severe sepsis (1.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.2<!--> <!-->pg/ml) as compared to patients with sepsis (2.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.2<!--> <!-->pg/ml). The mean FT3 level increased in survivors (2.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.03<!--> <!-->pg/ml) compared to non survivors (1.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.89<!--> <!-->pg/ml) (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). Correlation of FT3 on the 5th day to CRP (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.332, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.039), FT3 on 5th day to IL-6 (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.339, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.035) in non survivors. Correlation of FT3 on the 5th day to APACHE II (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.359, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.025) and SOFA score (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.427, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.007). ROC curves indicated that FT3 on the 5th day had the greatest power for predicting ICU mortality (sensitivity 87.2% and specificity 73.2%). CRP (sensitivity 100% and specificity 92.7%) is a better tool than IL-6 (sensitivity 92.3% and specificity 80.5%) in predicting mortality in sepsis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>FT3 levels were negatively correlated to CRP and IL-6 levels as well as APACHE II, SOFA scores. FT3 may be used as a marker of disease severity and a predictor of mortality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 55-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejccm.2015.11.001\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209073031500016X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209073031500016X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

甲状腺功能障碍与危重症患者的死亡率相关。我们研究了甲状腺激素与CRP在脓毒症患者中的预测价值。方法80例患者纳入一项在重症监护室进行的前瞻性随机研究。结果第5天ft3、FT4、TSH水平低于正常值的分别为61.3%、31.2%、23.8%。入院时FT3水平较第五天显著下降(p <0.001)。脓毒症、严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者甲状腺激素水平的比较;我们发现,脓毒症休克患者(1.3±0.4 pg/ml)和严重脓毒症患者(1.7±0.2 pg/ml)的FT3平均水平低于脓毒症患者(2.4±1.2 pg/ml)。生存者的平均FT3水平(2.9±1.03 pg/ml)高于非生存者(1.9±0.89 pg/ml) (p <0.001)。非幸存者第5天FT3与CRP (r =−0.332,p = 0.039)、第5天FT3与IL-6 (r =−0.339,p = 0.035)的相关性。第5天FT3与APACHEⅱ(r =−0.359,p = 0.025)和SOFA评分(r =−0.427,p = 0.007)的相关性。ROC曲线显示,第5天FT3对ICU死亡率的预测能力最强(敏感性87.2%,特异性73.2%)。CRP(敏感性100%,特异性92.7%)在预测败血症死亡率方面优于IL-6(敏感性92.3%,特异性80.5%)。结论ft3水平与CRP、IL-6水平及APACHE II、SOFA评分呈负相关。FT3可作为疾病严重程度的标志和死亡率的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive value of thyroid hormone assessment in septic patients in comparison with C-reactive protein

Introduction

Thyroid dysfunction is associated with mortality in critically ill patients. We investigated the predictive value of the thyroid hormone compared to CRP in septic patients.

Methods

80 patients were included in a prospective, randomized study done in the critical care department.

Results

FT3, FT4, and TSH levels on the fifth day were below the normal range in 61.3%, 31.2%, and 23.8% patients respectively. There was a significant decrease in the FT3 level on admission compared to the fifth day (p < 0.001). By comparison of thyroid hormone levels in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock; we found the mean level of FT3 was lower in patients with septic shock (1.3 ± 0.4 pg/ml) and severe sepsis (1.7 ± 0.2 pg/ml) as compared to patients with sepsis (2.4 ± 1.2 pg/ml). The mean FT3 level increased in survivors (2.9 ± 1.03 pg/ml) compared to non survivors (1.9 ± 0.89 pg/ml) (p < 0.001). Correlation of FT3 on the 5th day to CRP (r = −0.332, p = 0.039), FT3 on 5th day to IL-6 (r = −0.339, p = 0.035) in non survivors. Correlation of FT3 on the 5th day to APACHE II (r = −0.359, p = 0.025) and SOFA score (r = −0.427, p = 0.007). ROC curves indicated that FT3 on the 5th day had the greatest power for predicting ICU mortality (sensitivity 87.2% and specificity 73.2%). CRP (sensitivity 100% and specificity 92.7%) is a better tool than IL-6 (sensitivity 92.3% and specificity 80.5%) in predicting mortality in sepsis.

Conclusion

FT3 levels were negatively correlated to CRP and IL-6 levels as well as APACHE II, SOFA scores. FT3 may be used as a marker of disease severity and a predictor of mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine is the official Journal of the Egyptian College of Critical Care Physicians, the most authoritative organization of Egyptian physicians involved in the multi-professional field of critical care medicine. The journal is intended to provide a peer-reviewed source for multidisciplinary coverage of general acute and intensive care medicine and its various subcategories including cardiac, pulmonary, neuro, renal as well as post-operative care. The journal is proud to have an international multi-professional editorial board in the broad field of critical care that will assist in publishing promising research and breakthrough reports that lead to better patients care in life threatening conditions, and bring the reader a quick access to the latest diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in monitoring and management of critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信