Juane Li, Keke Liu, Shu Lin, K. Abdel-Ghaffar, W. Ryan
{"title":"一个未被注意到的基于代数和基于原型的LDPC代码之间的强连接,第一部分:二进制情况和解释","authors":"Juane Li, Keke Liu, Shu Lin, K. Abdel-Ghaffar, W. Ryan","doi":"10.1109/ITA.2015.7308964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper unveils a strong connection between two major constructions of LDPC codes, namely the algebraic-based and the protograph-based constructions. It is shown that, from a graph-theoretic point of view, an algebraic LDPC code whose parity-check matrix is an array of submatrices of the same size over a finite field is a protograph LDPC code. Conversely, from a matrix-theoretic point of view, since the parity-check matrix of a protograph code can be arranged as an array of submatrices of the same size over a finite field and its base graph (or base matrix) can be constructed algebraically, a protograph LDPC code is an algebraic LDPC code. These two major approaches have their advantages and disadvantages in code construction. Unification of these two approaches may lead to better designs and constructions of LDPC codes to achieve good overall performance in terms of error performance in waterfall region, error-floor location and rate of decoding convergence. This paper is the first part of a series of two parts, Part-I and Part-II. Part-I investigates only the binary LDPC codes constructed by the superposition and the protograph-based methods. Part-II explores nonbinary LDPC codes from both superposition and protograph points of view. Also included in Part II are specific superposition constructions of both binary and nonbinary quasi-cyclic LDPC codes.","PeriodicalId":150850,"journal":{"name":"2015 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An unnoticed strong connection between algebraic-based and protograph-based LDPC codes, Part I: Binary case and interpretation\",\"authors\":\"Juane Li, Keke Liu, Shu Lin, K. Abdel-Ghaffar, W. Ryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITA.2015.7308964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper unveils a strong connection between two major constructions of LDPC codes, namely the algebraic-based and the protograph-based constructions. It is shown that, from a graph-theoretic point of view, an algebraic LDPC code whose parity-check matrix is an array of submatrices of the same size over a finite field is a protograph LDPC code. Conversely, from a matrix-theoretic point of view, since the parity-check matrix of a protograph code can be arranged as an array of submatrices of the same size over a finite field and its base graph (or base matrix) can be constructed algebraically, a protograph LDPC code is an algebraic LDPC code. These two major approaches have their advantages and disadvantages in code construction. Unification of these two approaches may lead to better designs and constructions of LDPC codes to achieve good overall performance in terms of error performance in waterfall region, error-floor location and rate of decoding convergence. This paper is the first part of a series of two parts, Part-I and Part-II. Part-I investigates only the binary LDPC codes constructed by the superposition and the protograph-based methods. Part-II explores nonbinary LDPC codes from both superposition and protograph points of view. Also included in Part II are specific superposition constructions of both binary and nonbinary quasi-cyclic LDPC codes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITA.2015.7308964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITA.2015.7308964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An unnoticed strong connection between algebraic-based and protograph-based LDPC codes, Part I: Binary case and interpretation
This paper unveils a strong connection between two major constructions of LDPC codes, namely the algebraic-based and the protograph-based constructions. It is shown that, from a graph-theoretic point of view, an algebraic LDPC code whose parity-check matrix is an array of submatrices of the same size over a finite field is a protograph LDPC code. Conversely, from a matrix-theoretic point of view, since the parity-check matrix of a protograph code can be arranged as an array of submatrices of the same size over a finite field and its base graph (or base matrix) can be constructed algebraically, a protograph LDPC code is an algebraic LDPC code. These two major approaches have their advantages and disadvantages in code construction. Unification of these two approaches may lead to better designs and constructions of LDPC codes to achieve good overall performance in terms of error performance in waterfall region, error-floor location and rate of decoding convergence. This paper is the first part of a series of two parts, Part-I and Part-II. Part-I investigates only the binary LDPC codes constructed by the superposition and the protograph-based methods. Part-II explores nonbinary LDPC codes from both superposition and protograph points of view. Also included in Part II are specific superposition constructions of both binary and nonbinary quasi-cyclic LDPC codes.