一切如常?2019冠状病毒病时期的人权

IF 2.3
Vassilis P. Tzevelekos, K. Dzehtsiarou
{"title":"一切如常?2019冠状病毒病时期的人权","authors":"Vassilis P. Tzevelekos, K. Dzehtsiarou","doi":"10.1163/26663236-00102001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When we started drafting this editorial note, the coronavirus had not yet become a global threat. Our initial plan was to use this note to remind readers of the 50th anniversary in December 2019 of Greece’s withdrawal from the Council of Europe. Withdrawing was a means for the dictators who ruled Greece at that time to avoid the embarrassment of the impending expulsion of Greece from the Council of Europe in the aftermath of the emblematic Greek case.1 We would then connect the dots between this instance in the history of the Council of Europe and the recent emergence of illiberal democracies in Europe. Our ambition was to ask how the Council of Europe can rise to this new challenge and use its multifaceted apparatus effectively to react and possibly to sanction this alarming phenomenon. The two thought-provoking guest editorial notes by Professor Wolfgang Benedek and Judge Ineta Ziemele that we have the privilege to publish in this issue treat this question in some detail. The pandemic obliged us essentially to rewrite this editorial note. Evidently, this is a truly minor inconvenience compared with the impact that the pandemic has had – and continues to have – on people’s everyday lives or on the global economy, and with the feeling of vulnerability and fragility with which covid-19 has endowed humanity. Emergencies call for extraordinary measures. Inevitably, such measures interfere with human rights. Some of these interferences are direct, thus also easier to recognise. For instance, lockdown policies clash with and restrict a number of fundamental liberties. Other types","PeriodicalId":306057,"journal":{"name":"European Convention on Human Rights Law Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normal as Usual? Human Rights in Times of covid-19\",\"authors\":\"Vassilis P. Tzevelekos, K. Dzehtsiarou\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/26663236-00102001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When we started drafting this editorial note, the coronavirus had not yet become a global threat. Our initial plan was to use this note to remind readers of the 50th anniversary in December 2019 of Greece’s withdrawal from the Council of Europe. Withdrawing was a means for the dictators who ruled Greece at that time to avoid the embarrassment of the impending expulsion of Greece from the Council of Europe in the aftermath of the emblematic Greek case.1 We would then connect the dots between this instance in the history of the Council of Europe and the recent emergence of illiberal democracies in Europe. Our ambition was to ask how the Council of Europe can rise to this new challenge and use its multifaceted apparatus effectively to react and possibly to sanction this alarming phenomenon. The two thought-provoking guest editorial notes by Professor Wolfgang Benedek and Judge Ineta Ziemele that we have the privilege to publish in this issue treat this question in some detail. The pandemic obliged us essentially to rewrite this editorial note. Evidently, this is a truly minor inconvenience compared with the impact that the pandemic has had – and continues to have – on people’s everyday lives or on the global economy, and with the feeling of vulnerability and fragility with which covid-19 has endowed humanity. Emergencies call for extraordinary measures. Inevitably, such measures interfere with human rights. Some of these interferences are direct, thus also easier to recognise. For instance, lockdown policies clash with and restrict a number of fundamental liberties. Other types\",\"PeriodicalId\":306057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Convention on Human Rights Law Review\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Convention on Human Rights Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-00102001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Convention on Human Rights Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-00102001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

当我们开始起草这篇社论时,冠状病毒尚未成为全球威胁。我们最初的计划是用这张便条提醒读者2019年12月是希腊退出欧洲委员会50周年。退出是当时统治希腊的独裁者的一种手段,以避免希腊在具有象征意义的希腊事件之后即将被驱逐出欧洲委员会的尴尬然后,我们将把欧洲委员会历史上的这一实例与欧洲最近出现的非自由民主国家联系起来。我们的目标是要问,欧洲委员会如何能够奋起迎接这一新的挑战,并有效地利用其多方面的机构对这一令人震惊的现象作出反应,并可能予以制裁。Wolfgang Benedek教授和Ineta Ziemele法官的两篇发人深省的客座社论,我们有幸在本期杂志上发表,对这个问题进行了一些详细的探讨。这场大流行迫使我们基本上重写了这篇社论。显然,与疫情已经并将继续对人们日常生活或全球经济造成的影响,以及covid-19赋予人类的脆弱感相比,这确实是一个微不足道的不便。紧急情况要求采取非常措施。这些措施不可避免地会干涉人权。其中一些干扰是直接的,因此也更容易识别。例如,封锁政策与一些基本自由发生冲突并限制了这些自由。其他类型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Normal as Usual? Human Rights in Times of covid-19
When we started drafting this editorial note, the coronavirus had not yet become a global threat. Our initial plan was to use this note to remind readers of the 50th anniversary in December 2019 of Greece’s withdrawal from the Council of Europe. Withdrawing was a means for the dictators who ruled Greece at that time to avoid the embarrassment of the impending expulsion of Greece from the Council of Europe in the aftermath of the emblematic Greek case.1 We would then connect the dots between this instance in the history of the Council of Europe and the recent emergence of illiberal democracies in Europe. Our ambition was to ask how the Council of Europe can rise to this new challenge and use its multifaceted apparatus effectively to react and possibly to sanction this alarming phenomenon. The two thought-provoking guest editorial notes by Professor Wolfgang Benedek and Judge Ineta Ziemele that we have the privilege to publish in this issue treat this question in some detail. The pandemic obliged us essentially to rewrite this editorial note. Evidently, this is a truly minor inconvenience compared with the impact that the pandemic has had – and continues to have – on people’s everyday lives or on the global economy, and with the feeling of vulnerability and fragility with which covid-19 has endowed humanity. Emergencies call for extraordinary measures. Inevitably, such measures interfere with human rights. Some of these interferences are direct, thus also easier to recognise. For instance, lockdown policies clash with and restrict a number of fundamental liberties. Other types
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书