学前儿童游戏的发展:角色和假装情境:它们的意义和游戏活动的动机

D. El'konin
{"title":"学前儿童游戏的发展:角色和假装情境:它们的意义和游戏活动的动机","authors":"D. El'konin","doi":"10.2753/RPO1061-0405370631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The motives of play activity constitute a key question. It is no accident that views on play diverge most conspicuously with regard to the the stimuli leading to play. Theories of satisfaction, pleasure, internal primary drives and self-affirmation—all \"in-depth theories\"—are essentially theories of the motivating forces that give rise to play. The principal flaw in these conceptions is how they construe the motivating forces of play: they are situated in the subject, in the child and in the child's experiences. These theories discount the fact that these experiences are but secondary to an activity, i.e., they are symptomatic in that they indicate the activity is indeed taking place, but they tell us nothing about the real, objective, stimuli of the activity.","PeriodicalId":198083,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Russian and East European Psychology","volume":"491 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Development of Play in Preschoolers: Roles and pretend situations: Their significance and the motivation of play activity\",\"authors\":\"D. El'konin\",\"doi\":\"10.2753/RPO1061-0405370631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The motives of play activity constitute a key question. It is no accident that views on play diverge most conspicuously with regard to the the stimuli leading to play. Theories of satisfaction, pleasure, internal primary drives and self-affirmation—all \\\"in-depth theories\\\"—are essentially theories of the motivating forces that give rise to play. The principal flaw in these conceptions is how they construe the motivating forces of play: they are situated in the subject, in the child and in the child's experiences. These theories discount the fact that these experiences are but secondary to an activity, i.e., they are symptomatic in that they indicate the activity is indeed taking place, but they tell us nothing about the real, objective, stimuli of the activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Russian and East European Psychology\",\"volume\":\"491 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Russian and East European Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405370631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Russian and East European Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405370631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

游戏活动的动机是一个关键问题。关于游戏的观点在导致游戏的刺激因素方面分歧最明显,这并非偶然。关于满足、快乐、内在原动力和自我肯定的理论——所有这些“深度理论”——本质上都是关于产生玩耍的动力的理论。这些概念的主要缺陷在于它们如何解释游戏的动机:它们存在于主体、儿童和儿童的经验中。这些理论忽略了这样一个事实,即这些经验只是次要的活动,也就是说,它们是症状性的,因为它们表明活动确实发生了,但它们没有告诉我们活动的真实、客观的刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Development of Play in Preschoolers: Roles and pretend situations: Their significance and the motivation of play activity
The motives of play activity constitute a key question. It is no accident that views on play diverge most conspicuously with regard to the the stimuli leading to play. Theories of satisfaction, pleasure, internal primary drives and self-affirmation—all "in-depth theories"—are essentially theories of the motivating forces that give rise to play. The principal flaw in these conceptions is how they construe the motivating forces of play: they are situated in the subject, in the child and in the child's experiences. These theories discount the fact that these experiences are but secondary to an activity, i.e., they are symptomatic in that they indicate the activity is indeed taking place, but they tell us nothing about the real, objective, stimuli of the activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信