保护公民

Van Gosse
{"title":"保护公民","authors":"Van Gosse","doi":"10.5149/northcarolina/9781469660103.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philadelphia contained the early republic’s largest population of free people of color, described as “the elite of our people” by other African Americans. Led by the wealthy sailmaker James Forten and Bishop Richard Allen, founder of the AME Church, they practiced “shadow politics,” building their own institutions separate from white society, protected by powerful whites in the Pennsylvania Abolition Society. Despite their legal right to vote, however, they also accepted their de facto exclusion from party and electoral politics. This politics of deference in return for protection left black Philadelphians defenceless against white violence and disfranchisement in the 1830s, after which they retreated into a closed world of ritual and small-scale factional disputes.","PeriodicalId":367801,"journal":{"name":"The First Reconstruction","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citizens for Protection\",\"authors\":\"Van Gosse\",\"doi\":\"10.5149/northcarolina/9781469660103.003.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Philadelphia contained the early republic’s largest population of free people of color, described as “the elite of our people” by other African Americans. Led by the wealthy sailmaker James Forten and Bishop Richard Allen, founder of the AME Church, they practiced “shadow politics,” building their own institutions separate from white society, protected by powerful whites in the Pennsylvania Abolition Society. Despite their legal right to vote, however, they also accepted their de facto exclusion from party and electoral politics. This politics of deference in return for protection left black Philadelphians defenceless against white violence and disfranchisement in the 1830s, after which they retreated into a closed world of ritual and small-scale factional disputes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":367801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The First Reconstruction\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The First Reconstruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469660103.003.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The First Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469660103.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

费城拥有共和国早期最多的有色人种自由人口,他们被其他非裔美国人称为“我们人民中的精英”。在富有的帆船制造商詹姆斯·福顿(James Forten)和AME教会创始人理查德·艾伦(Richard Allen)主教的领导下,他们实行“影子政治”,建立了自己与白人社会分离的机构,受到宾夕法尼亚废奴协会(Pennsylvania废奴协会)中强大的白人的保护。然而,尽管他们有合法的投票权,但他们也接受了事实上被排除在政党和选举政治之外的事实。这种以尊重换取保护的政治使得费城黑人在19世纪30年代无力抵抗白人的暴力和剥夺选举权,之后他们退回到一个充满仪式和小规模派系纷争的封闭世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Citizens for Protection
Philadelphia contained the early republic’s largest population of free people of color, described as “the elite of our people” by other African Americans. Led by the wealthy sailmaker James Forten and Bishop Richard Allen, founder of the AME Church, they practiced “shadow politics,” building their own institutions separate from white society, protected by powerful whites in the Pennsylvania Abolition Society. Despite their legal right to vote, however, they also accepted their de facto exclusion from party and electoral politics. This politics of deference in return for protection left black Philadelphians defenceless against white violence and disfranchisement in the 1830s, after which they retreated into a closed world of ritual and small-scale factional disputes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信