异化与救赎:英国(罗马)考古的实践

J. Weekes, Sadie Watson, Lacey Wallace, F. Mazzilli, A. Gardner, M. Alberti
{"title":"异化与救赎:英国(罗马)考古的实践","authors":"J. Weekes, Sadie Watson, Lacey Wallace, F. Mazzilli, A. Gardner, M. Alberti","doi":"10.16995/traj.374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The TRAC session that led to this series of combined mini-papers was consciously designed as a forum for discussion, the aim being to consider how to tackle perceived systemic problems in the archaeology of Roman Britain (as much as the archaeology of other periods) that lead to destructive methods, interpretive fallacies and poor job satisfaction. The shared feeling of those present seemed to be that the systems prevalent in both developer-funded (or ‘commercial’) archaeology, university archaeology departments and even in the museum context are overly driven by ideas of competition, division and acquisition for its own sake, the apparently dominant neoliberal values of our time. Such values are not akin to the valuing of the historic environment per se, but rather promote constraining hierarchies within and between organisations, and a basic lack of communication and team working.","PeriodicalId":393384,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Roman Archaeology Journal","volume":"484 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alienation and Redemption: The Praxis of (Roman) Archaeology in Britain\",\"authors\":\"J. Weekes, Sadie Watson, Lacey Wallace, F. Mazzilli, A. Gardner, M. Alberti\",\"doi\":\"10.16995/traj.374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The TRAC session that led to this series of combined mini-papers was consciously designed as a forum for discussion, the aim being to consider how to tackle perceived systemic problems in the archaeology of Roman Britain (as much as the archaeology of other periods) that lead to destructive methods, interpretive fallacies and poor job satisfaction. The shared feeling of those present seemed to be that the systems prevalent in both developer-funded (or ‘commercial’) archaeology, university archaeology departments and even in the museum context are overly driven by ideas of competition, division and acquisition for its own sake, the apparently dominant neoliberal values of our time. Such values are not akin to the valuing of the historic environment per se, but rather promote constraining hierarchies within and between organisations, and a basic lack of communication and team working.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Roman Archaeology Journal\",\"volume\":\"484 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Roman Archaeology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16995/traj.374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Roman Archaeology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/traj.374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

导致这一系列迷你论文组合的TRAC会议被有意识地设计为一个讨论论坛,目的是考虑如何解决罗马不列颠考古学(以及其他时期的考古学)中感知到的系统性问题,这些问题导致了破坏性的方法,解释谬误和低工作满意度。在场的人的共同感受似乎是,在开发商资助的(或“商业”)考古、大学考古院系甚至博物馆环境中,普遍存在的系统过度受到竞争、分裂和为自身利益而获取的观念的驱动,这显然是我们这个时代占主导地位的新自由主义价值观。这种价值观与历史环境本身的价值不同,而是促进组织内部和组织之间的限制性等级制度,以及基本缺乏沟通和团队合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alienation and Redemption: The Praxis of (Roman) Archaeology in Britain
The TRAC session that led to this series of combined mini-papers was consciously designed as a forum for discussion, the aim being to consider how to tackle perceived systemic problems in the archaeology of Roman Britain (as much as the archaeology of other periods) that lead to destructive methods, interpretive fallacies and poor job satisfaction. The shared feeling of those present seemed to be that the systems prevalent in both developer-funded (or ‘commercial’) archaeology, university archaeology departments and even in the museum context are overly driven by ideas of competition, division and acquisition for its own sake, the apparently dominant neoliberal values of our time. Such values are not akin to the valuing of the historic environment per se, but rather promote constraining hierarchies within and between organisations, and a basic lack of communication and team working.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信