2003年和2005年阿根廷选举:从异常和紧急到政府合法化

Horacio Vives Segl
{"title":"2003年和2005年阿根廷选举:从异常和紧急到政府合法化","authors":"Horacio Vives Segl","doi":"10.29654/TJD.200607.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the Argentinean presidential election of April 27, 2003, and the legislative election of October 23, 2005. Until the December 2001 crisis and since 1983, elections had taken place in a context of institutional normality and regularity. The author describes the economic crisis, the worst in twenty years of democracy, and the political crisis it produced. He argues that this first Argentinean presidential campaign of the twenty-first century was atypical compared with other elections held since the return of democracy: the possibilities of a first-round winner were minimal and a second round was necessary, so that this became the most contested and uncertain election in recent Argentine history; for the first time, the main parties did not present a single ticket, but were divided into various groups, and there was an unprecedented number of candidates-eighteen presidential slates were submitted, although only five had any real chance of winning; it was also the first time worldwide, a former president (Menem) who had promoted constitutional reform to introduce ballotage, ran for president, won first place in the initial round, stated his intention to participate in the second round, and finally announced that he would drop out; and the economic and social context in which the election took place was also notable, as it was perhaps the first time since the return to democracy that the Argentinean population had been so severely buffeted by a crisis at election time. Thus, the winner, President Kirchner, was forced to engage in institutional engineering and deploy all his political skill to ensure governability, and to work to consolidate political and democratic institutions. The author argues that although the president was clearly the outright winner of the legislative elections of October 23, the greatest winner was Argentine democracy. Not only did the country undergo an adjustment of its party system, but also citizens, who had earlier shown alack of trust in all political leaders, flocked to the polls on October 23, 2005, thus taking a vital step toward the consolidation of political institutions.","PeriodicalId":403398,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan journal of democracy","volume":"273 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 2003 and 2005 Elections in Argentina: From Anomaly and Emergency to the Legitimization of a Government\",\"authors\":\"Horacio Vives Segl\",\"doi\":\"10.29654/TJD.200607.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article describes the Argentinean presidential election of April 27, 2003, and the legislative election of October 23, 2005. Until the December 2001 crisis and since 1983, elections had taken place in a context of institutional normality and regularity. The author describes the economic crisis, the worst in twenty years of democracy, and the political crisis it produced. He argues that this first Argentinean presidential campaign of the twenty-first century was atypical compared with other elections held since the return of democracy: the possibilities of a first-round winner were minimal and a second round was necessary, so that this became the most contested and uncertain election in recent Argentine history; for the first time, the main parties did not present a single ticket, but were divided into various groups, and there was an unprecedented number of candidates-eighteen presidential slates were submitted, although only five had any real chance of winning; it was also the first time worldwide, a former president (Menem) who had promoted constitutional reform to introduce ballotage, ran for president, won first place in the initial round, stated his intention to participate in the second round, and finally announced that he would drop out; and the economic and social context in which the election took place was also notable, as it was perhaps the first time since the return to democracy that the Argentinean population had been so severely buffeted by a crisis at election time. Thus, the winner, President Kirchner, was forced to engage in institutional engineering and deploy all his political skill to ensure governability, and to work to consolidate political and democratic institutions. The author argues that although the president was clearly the outright winner of the legislative elections of October 23, the greatest winner was Argentine democracy. Not only did the country undergo an adjustment of its party system, but also citizens, who had earlier shown alack of trust in all political leaders, flocked to the polls on October 23, 2005, thus taking a vital step toward the consolidation of political institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taiwan journal of democracy\",\"volume\":\"273 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taiwan journal of democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29654/TJD.200607.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan journal of democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29654/TJD.200607.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文描述了2003年4月27日的阿根廷总统选举和2005年10月23日的立法选举。在2001年12月危机之前和1983年以来,选举都是在体制正常和有规律的情况下进行的。作者描述了民主20年来最严重的经济危机,以及由此产生的政治危机。他认为,与民主回归以来举行的其他选举相比,21世纪的第一次阿根廷总统竞选是非典型的:第一轮获胜者的可能性很小,第二轮是必要的,因此这成为阿根廷近代史上竞争最激烈和最不确定的选举;这是第一次,主要政党没有提交一张单一的选票,而是被分成不同的集团,候选人的数量是前所未有的——提交了18张总统候选人名单,尽管只有5张有真正获胜的机会;这也是世界上第一次,一位推动宪法改革引入投票制度的前总统(梅内姆)竞选总统,在第一轮选举中获得第一名,表示有意参加第二轮选举,最后宣布退出;举行选举的经济和社会背景也值得注意,因为这也许是自恢复民主以来阿根廷人民第一次在选举期间受到如此严重的危机的打击。因此,胜利者基什内尔总统被迫参与制度工程,动用他所有的政治技巧来确保治理能力,并努力巩固政治和民主制度。作者认为,虽然总统显然是10月23日立法选举的绝对赢家,但最大的赢家是阿根廷的民主。这个国家不仅经历了政党制度的调整,而且早前对所有政治领导人缺乏信任的公民也在2005年10月23日涌向投票站,从而朝着巩固政治机构迈出了至关重要的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The 2003 and 2005 Elections in Argentina: From Anomaly and Emergency to the Legitimization of a Government
This article describes the Argentinean presidential election of April 27, 2003, and the legislative election of October 23, 2005. Until the December 2001 crisis and since 1983, elections had taken place in a context of institutional normality and regularity. The author describes the economic crisis, the worst in twenty years of democracy, and the political crisis it produced. He argues that this first Argentinean presidential campaign of the twenty-first century was atypical compared with other elections held since the return of democracy: the possibilities of a first-round winner were minimal and a second round was necessary, so that this became the most contested and uncertain election in recent Argentine history; for the first time, the main parties did not present a single ticket, but were divided into various groups, and there was an unprecedented number of candidates-eighteen presidential slates were submitted, although only five had any real chance of winning; it was also the first time worldwide, a former president (Menem) who had promoted constitutional reform to introduce ballotage, ran for president, won first place in the initial round, stated his intention to participate in the second round, and finally announced that he would drop out; and the economic and social context in which the election took place was also notable, as it was perhaps the first time since the return to democracy that the Argentinean population had been so severely buffeted by a crisis at election time. Thus, the winner, President Kirchner, was forced to engage in institutional engineering and deploy all his political skill to ensure governability, and to work to consolidate political and democratic institutions. The author argues that although the president was clearly the outright winner of the legislative elections of October 23, the greatest winner was Argentine democracy. Not only did the country undergo an adjustment of its party system, but also citizens, who had earlier shown alack of trust in all political leaders, flocked to the polls on October 23, 2005, thus taking a vital step toward the consolidation of political institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信