动态的基于实用程序的好交易边界

M. Schweizer, T. Wien, Versicherungsmathematik Departement, Fam ETH-Zentrum
{"title":"动态的基于实用程序的好交易边界","authors":"M. Schweizer, T. Wien, Versicherungsmathematik Departement, Fam ETH-Zentrum","doi":"10.1524/STND.2007.0905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce and study no-good-deal valuation bounds deflned in terms of ex- pected utility. A utility-based good deal is a payofi whose expected utility is too high in comparison to the utility of its price. Forbidding good deals induces, via duality, restrictions on pricing kernels and thereby gives tighter valuation bounds on payofis than absence of arbitrage alone. Our approach extends earlier work by • Cern¶ (2003) in several directions: We give rigorous results for a general proba- bility space instead of flnite ›; we systematically use duality results to provide a streamlined approach with simple arguments; we do all this rigorously for both static and dynamic situations; and we give a systematic comparison between local and global (conditional) pricing kernel restrictions for the temporally dynamic setting. For the dynamic case, we show in a Levy framework that deflning no- good-deal valuation measures by imposing local conditional restrictions on their instantaneous market prices of risk gives valuation bounds having very good dy- namic properties as processes over time. We also show that global restrictions cannot yield such results in general.","PeriodicalId":380446,"journal":{"name":"Statistics & Decisions","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic utility-based good deal bounds\",\"authors\":\"M. Schweizer, T. Wien, Versicherungsmathematik Departement, Fam ETH-Zentrum\",\"doi\":\"10.1524/STND.2007.0905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce and study no-good-deal valuation bounds deflned in terms of ex- pected utility. A utility-based good deal is a payofi whose expected utility is too high in comparison to the utility of its price. Forbidding good deals induces, via duality, restrictions on pricing kernels and thereby gives tighter valuation bounds on payofis than absence of arbitrage alone. Our approach extends earlier work by • Cern¶ (2003) in several directions: We give rigorous results for a general proba- bility space instead of flnite ›; we systematically use duality results to provide a streamlined approach with simple arguments; we do all this rigorously for both static and dynamic situations; and we give a systematic comparison between local and global (conditional) pricing kernel restrictions for the temporally dynamic setting. For the dynamic case, we show in a Levy framework that deflning no- good-deal valuation measures by imposing local conditional restrictions on their instantaneous market prices of risk gives valuation bounds having very good dy- namic properties as processes over time. We also show that global restrictions cannot yield such results in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics & Decisions\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics & Decisions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1524/STND.2007.0905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics & Decisions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1524/STND.2007.0905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

我们引入并研究了以预期效用为基础的不良交易估值界限。基于效用的大宗交易是一笔预期效用与其价格效用相比过高的收益。通过对偶性,禁止好的交易导致了对定价核心的限制,从而给收益设定了比没有套利更严格的估值界限。我们的方法在几个方向上扩展了Cern¶(2003)的早期工作:我们给出了一般概率空间而不是flnite的严格结果;我们系统地使用对偶结果,以简单的论点提供一个精简的方法;我们在静态和动态情况下都严格执行这一切;并对局部和全局(条件)定价核限制进行了系统的比较。对于动态情况,我们在Levy框架中表明,通过对风险的瞬时市场价格施加局部条件限制来抵制不良交易估值措施,可以使估值界限随着时间的推移具有非常好的动态特性。我们还表明,一般来说,全球限制不能产生这样的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic utility-based good deal bounds
We introduce and study no-good-deal valuation bounds deflned in terms of ex- pected utility. A utility-based good deal is a payofi whose expected utility is too high in comparison to the utility of its price. Forbidding good deals induces, via duality, restrictions on pricing kernels and thereby gives tighter valuation bounds on payofis than absence of arbitrage alone. Our approach extends earlier work by • Cern¶ (2003) in several directions: We give rigorous results for a general proba- bility space instead of flnite ›; we systematically use duality results to provide a streamlined approach with simple arguments; we do all this rigorously for both static and dynamic situations; and we give a systematic comparison between local and global (conditional) pricing kernel restrictions for the temporally dynamic setting. For the dynamic case, we show in a Levy framework that deflning no- good-deal valuation measures by imposing local conditional restrictions on their instantaneous market prices of risk gives valuation bounds having very good dy- namic properties as processes over time. We also show that global restrictions cannot yield such results in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信